Cargando…

Test Reliability and Compliance to a Twelve-Month Visual Field Telemedicine Study in Glaucoma Patients

Background: Our primary aim is to quantify test reliability and compliance of glaucoma patients to a weekly visual field telemedicine (VFTM) schedule. A secondary aim is to determine concordance of the VFTM results to in-clinic outcomes. Methods: Participants with stable glaucoma in one eye were rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prea, Selwyn Marc, Vingrys, Algis Jonas, Kong, George Yu Xiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9332101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35893408
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154317
_version_ 1784758566055313408
author Prea, Selwyn Marc
Vingrys, Algis Jonas
Kong, George Yu Xiang
author_facet Prea, Selwyn Marc
Vingrys, Algis Jonas
Kong, George Yu Xiang
author_sort Prea, Selwyn Marc
collection PubMed
description Background: Our primary aim is to quantify test reliability and compliance of glaucoma patients to a weekly visual field telemedicine (VFTM) schedule. A secondary aim is to determine concordance of the VFTM results to in-clinic outcomes. Methods: Participants with stable glaucoma in one eye were recruited for a 12 month VFTM trial using the Melbourne Rapid Fields (MRF-home, MRFh) iPad application. Participants attended routine 6 month clinical reviews and were tasked with weekly home monitoring with the MRFh over this period. We determined compliance to weekly VFTM (7 + 1 days) and test reliability (false positives (FPs) and fixation loss (FL) <33%). A secondary aim considered concordance to in-clinic measures of visual field (MRF-clinic (MRFc) and the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA)) in active participants (≥10 home examinations and 5 reliable HFA examinations). The linear trend in the MRFh mean deviation (MD) was compared to the HFA guided progression analysis (GPA) using Bland–Altman methods. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. Results: Forty-seven participants with a mean age of 64 ± 14.6 years were recruited for the trial. The VFTM uptake was 85% and compliance to weekly home monitoring was 75% in the presence of weekly text reminders in the analysed group (n = 20). The analysed group was composed of test subjects with five reliable in-clinic HFA examinations (GPA analysis available) and who submitted a minimum of 10 MRFh examinations from home. Of the 757 home examinations returned, approximately two-thirds were reliable, which was significantly lower than the test reliability of the HFA in-clinic (MRFh: 65% vs. HFA: 85%, p < 0.001). The HFA-GPA analysis gave little bias from the MRFh slope (bias: 0.05 dB/yr, p > 0.05). Two eyes were found to have clinical progression during the 12 month period, and both were detected by VFTM. Conclusions: VFTM over 12 months returned good compliance (75%) to weekly testing with good concordance to in-clinic assays. VFTM is a viable option for monitoring patients with glaucoma for visual field progression in between clinical visits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9332101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93321012022-07-29 Test Reliability and Compliance to a Twelve-Month Visual Field Telemedicine Study in Glaucoma Patients Prea, Selwyn Marc Vingrys, Algis Jonas Kong, George Yu Xiang J Clin Med Article Background: Our primary aim is to quantify test reliability and compliance of glaucoma patients to a weekly visual field telemedicine (VFTM) schedule. A secondary aim is to determine concordance of the VFTM results to in-clinic outcomes. Methods: Participants with stable glaucoma in one eye were recruited for a 12 month VFTM trial using the Melbourne Rapid Fields (MRF-home, MRFh) iPad application. Participants attended routine 6 month clinical reviews and were tasked with weekly home monitoring with the MRFh over this period. We determined compliance to weekly VFTM (7 + 1 days) and test reliability (false positives (FPs) and fixation loss (FL) <33%). A secondary aim considered concordance to in-clinic measures of visual field (MRF-clinic (MRFc) and the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA)) in active participants (≥10 home examinations and 5 reliable HFA examinations). The linear trend in the MRFh mean deviation (MD) was compared to the HFA guided progression analysis (GPA) using Bland–Altman methods. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. Results: Forty-seven participants with a mean age of 64 ± 14.6 years were recruited for the trial. The VFTM uptake was 85% and compliance to weekly home monitoring was 75% in the presence of weekly text reminders in the analysed group (n = 20). The analysed group was composed of test subjects with five reliable in-clinic HFA examinations (GPA analysis available) and who submitted a minimum of 10 MRFh examinations from home. Of the 757 home examinations returned, approximately two-thirds were reliable, which was significantly lower than the test reliability of the HFA in-clinic (MRFh: 65% vs. HFA: 85%, p < 0.001). The HFA-GPA analysis gave little bias from the MRFh slope (bias: 0.05 dB/yr, p > 0.05). Two eyes were found to have clinical progression during the 12 month period, and both were detected by VFTM. Conclusions: VFTM over 12 months returned good compliance (75%) to weekly testing with good concordance to in-clinic assays. VFTM is a viable option for monitoring patients with glaucoma for visual field progression in between clinical visits. MDPI 2022-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9332101/ /pubmed/35893408 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154317 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Prea, Selwyn Marc
Vingrys, Algis Jonas
Kong, George Yu Xiang
Test Reliability and Compliance to a Twelve-Month Visual Field Telemedicine Study in Glaucoma Patients
title Test Reliability and Compliance to a Twelve-Month Visual Field Telemedicine Study in Glaucoma Patients
title_full Test Reliability and Compliance to a Twelve-Month Visual Field Telemedicine Study in Glaucoma Patients
title_fullStr Test Reliability and Compliance to a Twelve-Month Visual Field Telemedicine Study in Glaucoma Patients
title_full_unstemmed Test Reliability and Compliance to a Twelve-Month Visual Field Telemedicine Study in Glaucoma Patients
title_short Test Reliability and Compliance to a Twelve-Month Visual Field Telemedicine Study in Glaucoma Patients
title_sort test reliability and compliance to a twelve-month visual field telemedicine study in glaucoma patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9332101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35893408
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154317
work_keys_str_mv AT preaselwynmarc testreliabilityandcompliancetoatwelvemonthvisualfieldtelemedicinestudyinglaucomapatients
AT vingrysalgisjonas testreliabilityandcompliancetoatwelvemonthvisualfieldtelemedicinestudyinglaucomapatients
AT konggeorgeyuxiang testreliabilityandcompliancetoatwelvemonthvisualfieldtelemedicinestudyinglaucomapatients