Cargando…

Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Conventional gastrectomy combined with regional lymph node dissection has been the standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). This retrospective case–control study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and surgical resection for EGC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qian, Meng, Sheng, Yuan, Wu, Min, Wang, Song, Zhang, Kaiguang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9332274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892861
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153603
_version_ 1784758606009204736
author Qian, Meng
Sheng, Yuan
Wu, Min
Wang, Song
Zhang, Kaiguang
author_facet Qian, Meng
Sheng, Yuan
Wu, Min
Wang, Song
Zhang, Kaiguang
author_sort Qian, Meng
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Conventional gastrectomy combined with regional lymph node dissection has been the standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). This retrospective case–control study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and surgical resection for EGC in China. After propensity score-matching, there were no significant differences between the two groups for OS, RFS, and DSS. Additionally, with similar R0 resection and recurrence rates, the ESD group showed less blood loss, fewer adverse events, lower hospital cost, and a shorter operative time and hospital duration than the surgery group. Therefore, ESD can be a first-line treatment of EGC in addition to surgery. ABSTRACT: Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a preferred treatment option for early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of ESD and surgical resection for EGC. Methods: This was a retrospective case–control study. Patients with a diagnosis of EGC who underwent ESD or surgery in our hospital from 2011 to 2020 were enrolled. We compared the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of these two groups according to propensity score-matching. The primary outcome comparison was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and treatment-related events. Results: In the matched cohort, the ESD group showed comparable OS, RFS, and DSS with the surgery group. Statistical differences were shown in blood loss and adverse events. Furthermore, the ESD group showed lower hospital cost, as well as a shorter operative time and hospital duration than the surgery group. The R0 resection and recurrence rates were similar between the two groups. In Cox regression analysis, age, tumor size, poor differentiation, and lymphovascular invasion were regarded as independent factors of OS. Conclusions: With sufficient safety and advantages, ESD can be a first-line treatment of EGC. Preoperative evaluation is vital to the appropriate treatment and prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9332274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93322742022-07-29 Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer Qian, Meng Sheng, Yuan Wu, Min Wang, Song Zhang, Kaiguang Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Conventional gastrectomy combined with regional lymph node dissection has been the standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). This retrospective case–control study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and surgical resection for EGC in China. After propensity score-matching, there were no significant differences between the two groups for OS, RFS, and DSS. Additionally, with similar R0 resection and recurrence rates, the ESD group showed less blood loss, fewer adverse events, lower hospital cost, and a shorter operative time and hospital duration than the surgery group. Therefore, ESD can be a first-line treatment of EGC in addition to surgery. ABSTRACT: Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a preferred treatment option for early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of ESD and surgical resection for EGC. Methods: This was a retrospective case–control study. Patients with a diagnosis of EGC who underwent ESD or surgery in our hospital from 2011 to 2020 were enrolled. We compared the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of these two groups according to propensity score-matching. The primary outcome comparison was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and treatment-related events. Results: In the matched cohort, the ESD group showed comparable OS, RFS, and DSS with the surgery group. Statistical differences were shown in blood loss and adverse events. Furthermore, the ESD group showed lower hospital cost, as well as a shorter operative time and hospital duration than the surgery group. The R0 resection and recurrence rates were similar between the two groups. In Cox regression analysis, age, tumor size, poor differentiation, and lymphovascular invasion were regarded as independent factors of OS. Conclusions: With sufficient safety and advantages, ESD can be a first-line treatment of EGC. Preoperative evaluation is vital to the appropriate treatment and prognosis. MDPI 2022-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9332274/ /pubmed/35892861 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153603 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Qian, Meng
Sheng, Yuan
Wu, Min
Wang, Song
Zhang, Kaiguang
Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer
title Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer
title_full Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer
title_fullStr Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer
title_short Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer
title_sort comparison between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery in patients with early gastric cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9332274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892861
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153603
work_keys_str_mv AT qianmeng comparisonbetweenendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionandsurgeryinpatientswithearlygastriccancer
AT shengyuan comparisonbetweenendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionandsurgeryinpatientswithearlygastriccancer
AT wumin comparisonbetweenendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionandsurgeryinpatientswithearlygastriccancer
AT wangsong comparisonbetweenendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionandsurgeryinpatientswithearlygastriccancer
AT zhangkaiguang comparisonbetweenendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionandsurgeryinpatientswithearlygastriccancer