Cargando…
Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Conventional gastrectomy combined with regional lymph node dissection has been the standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). This retrospective case–control study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and surgical resection for EGC...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9332274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892861 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153603 |
_version_ | 1784758606009204736 |
---|---|
author | Qian, Meng Sheng, Yuan Wu, Min Wang, Song Zhang, Kaiguang |
author_facet | Qian, Meng Sheng, Yuan Wu, Min Wang, Song Zhang, Kaiguang |
author_sort | Qian, Meng |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Conventional gastrectomy combined with regional lymph node dissection has been the standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). This retrospective case–control study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and surgical resection for EGC in China. After propensity score-matching, there were no significant differences between the two groups for OS, RFS, and DSS. Additionally, with similar R0 resection and recurrence rates, the ESD group showed less blood loss, fewer adverse events, lower hospital cost, and a shorter operative time and hospital duration than the surgery group. Therefore, ESD can be a first-line treatment of EGC in addition to surgery. ABSTRACT: Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a preferred treatment option for early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of ESD and surgical resection for EGC. Methods: This was a retrospective case–control study. Patients with a diagnosis of EGC who underwent ESD or surgery in our hospital from 2011 to 2020 were enrolled. We compared the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of these two groups according to propensity score-matching. The primary outcome comparison was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and treatment-related events. Results: In the matched cohort, the ESD group showed comparable OS, RFS, and DSS with the surgery group. Statistical differences were shown in blood loss and adverse events. Furthermore, the ESD group showed lower hospital cost, as well as a shorter operative time and hospital duration than the surgery group. The R0 resection and recurrence rates were similar between the two groups. In Cox regression analysis, age, tumor size, poor differentiation, and lymphovascular invasion were regarded as independent factors of OS. Conclusions: With sufficient safety and advantages, ESD can be a first-line treatment of EGC. Preoperative evaluation is vital to the appropriate treatment and prognosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9332274 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93322742022-07-29 Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer Qian, Meng Sheng, Yuan Wu, Min Wang, Song Zhang, Kaiguang Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Conventional gastrectomy combined with regional lymph node dissection has been the standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). This retrospective case–control study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and surgical resection for EGC in China. After propensity score-matching, there were no significant differences between the two groups for OS, RFS, and DSS. Additionally, with similar R0 resection and recurrence rates, the ESD group showed less blood loss, fewer adverse events, lower hospital cost, and a shorter operative time and hospital duration than the surgery group. Therefore, ESD can be a first-line treatment of EGC in addition to surgery. ABSTRACT: Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a preferred treatment option for early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of ESD and surgical resection for EGC. Methods: This was a retrospective case–control study. Patients with a diagnosis of EGC who underwent ESD or surgery in our hospital from 2011 to 2020 were enrolled. We compared the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of these two groups according to propensity score-matching. The primary outcome comparison was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and treatment-related events. Results: In the matched cohort, the ESD group showed comparable OS, RFS, and DSS with the surgery group. Statistical differences were shown in blood loss and adverse events. Furthermore, the ESD group showed lower hospital cost, as well as a shorter operative time and hospital duration than the surgery group. The R0 resection and recurrence rates were similar between the two groups. In Cox regression analysis, age, tumor size, poor differentiation, and lymphovascular invasion were regarded as independent factors of OS. Conclusions: With sufficient safety and advantages, ESD can be a first-line treatment of EGC. Preoperative evaluation is vital to the appropriate treatment and prognosis. MDPI 2022-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9332274/ /pubmed/35892861 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153603 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Qian, Meng Sheng, Yuan Wu, Min Wang, Song Zhang, Kaiguang Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer |
title | Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer |
title_full | Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer |
title_short | Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer |
title_sort | comparison between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery in patients with early gastric cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9332274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892861 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153603 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qianmeng comparisonbetweenendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionandsurgeryinpatientswithearlygastriccancer AT shengyuan comparisonbetweenendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionandsurgeryinpatientswithearlygastriccancer AT wumin comparisonbetweenendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionandsurgeryinpatientswithearlygastriccancer AT wangsong comparisonbetweenendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionandsurgeryinpatientswithearlygastriccancer AT zhangkaiguang comparisonbetweenendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionandsurgeryinpatientswithearlygastriccancer |