Cargando…

Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial

Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare a double-layer running suture re-anastomosis urethral stricture repair with early catheter removal to the conventional interrupted suture re-anastomosis after excision of a bulbar urethral stricture. Methods: A consecutive series of patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claassen, Frederik M., Martins, Francisco E., Mutambirwa, Shingai B. A., Potgieter, Linda, Botes, Lezelle, Kotze, Harry F., Smit, Francis E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9332494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35893343
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154252
_version_ 1784758661335220224
author Claassen, Frederik M.
Martins, Francisco E.
Mutambirwa, Shingai B. A.
Potgieter, Linda
Botes, Lezelle
Kotze, Harry F.
Smit, Francis E.
author_facet Claassen, Frederik M.
Martins, Francisco E.
Mutambirwa, Shingai B. A.
Potgieter, Linda
Botes, Lezelle
Kotze, Harry F.
Smit, Francis E.
author_sort Claassen, Frederik M.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare a double-layer running suture re-anastomosis urethral stricture repair with early catheter removal to the conventional interrupted suture re-anastomosis after excision of a bulbar urethral stricture. Methods: A consecutive series of patients with bulbar urethral stricture were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized into two groups according to an odd/even serial number distribution. Patients’ medical records were analyzed for demographics, stricture characteristics, and lower urinary tract obstructive symptoms. The outcomes were based on the presence/absence of obstructive voiding symptoms, and retrograde urethrography (RGU) performed on the first post-operative day in Group 1 and in both groups (Groups 1 and 2) at six weeks after surgery. Flexible urethroscopy was only performed on specific cases where RGU was unclear both pre- and post-operatively or when clinical recurrence was suspected. The minimum follow-up (FU) was 18 months. Success was defined as no need for subsequent dilatation, direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU), or urethroplasty. Results: A total of thirty-six patients with a mean age of 45 years (range 20 to 69 years) with bulbar urethral stricture were included in this study. Group 1 and Group 2 included 19 and 17 patients, respectively. Two patients were lost during randomization and subsequently to FU. The average stricture lengths were comparable between the two groups according to the retrograde urethrogram: 1.20 cm (range 0.6 to 2) in Group 1 and 1.27 cm (range 0.5 to 2.4) in Group 2, respectively (p = 0.631). The success rate for Group 1 was 90% after a mean follow-up of thirty-six months (range 20 to 40), which was clinically significant compared to the 71% in Group 2 after a mean FU of thirty-three months (range 19 to 40; p = 0.0218; 95% CI: 0.462–41.5766). Conclusions: Anastomotic urethroplasty (AR) performed with a double layer re-anastomosis had a cure rate comparable to the conventional anastomosis with interrupted sutures after a follow-up of eighteen months and longer. The urethral catheter can be safely removed within twenty-four hours after the excision of stricture and double-layer re-anastomosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9332494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93324942022-07-29 Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial Claassen, Frederik M. Martins, Francisco E. Mutambirwa, Shingai B. A. Potgieter, Linda Botes, Lezelle Kotze, Harry F. Smit, Francis E. J Clin Med Article Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare a double-layer running suture re-anastomosis urethral stricture repair with early catheter removal to the conventional interrupted suture re-anastomosis after excision of a bulbar urethral stricture. Methods: A consecutive series of patients with bulbar urethral stricture were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized into two groups according to an odd/even serial number distribution. Patients’ medical records were analyzed for demographics, stricture characteristics, and lower urinary tract obstructive symptoms. The outcomes were based on the presence/absence of obstructive voiding symptoms, and retrograde urethrography (RGU) performed on the first post-operative day in Group 1 and in both groups (Groups 1 and 2) at six weeks after surgery. Flexible urethroscopy was only performed on specific cases where RGU was unclear both pre- and post-operatively or when clinical recurrence was suspected. The minimum follow-up (FU) was 18 months. Success was defined as no need for subsequent dilatation, direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU), or urethroplasty. Results: A total of thirty-six patients with a mean age of 45 years (range 20 to 69 years) with bulbar urethral stricture were included in this study. Group 1 and Group 2 included 19 and 17 patients, respectively. Two patients were lost during randomization and subsequently to FU. The average stricture lengths were comparable between the two groups according to the retrograde urethrogram: 1.20 cm (range 0.6 to 2) in Group 1 and 1.27 cm (range 0.5 to 2.4) in Group 2, respectively (p = 0.631). The success rate for Group 1 was 90% after a mean follow-up of thirty-six months (range 20 to 40), which was clinically significant compared to the 71% in Group 2 after a mean FU of thirty-three months (range 19 to 40; p = 0.0218; 95% CI: 0.462–41.5766). Conclusions: Anastomotic urethroplasty (AR) performed with a double layer re-anastomosis had a cure rate comparable to the conventional anastomosis with interrupted sutures after a follow-up of eighteen months and longer. The urethral catheter can be safely removed within twenty-four hours after the excision of stricture and double-layer re-anastomosis. MDPI 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9332494/ /pubmed/35893343 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154252 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Claassen, Frederik M.
Martins, Francisco E.
Mutambirwa, Shingai B. A.
Potgieter, Linda
Botes, Lezelle
Kotze, Harry F.
Smit, Francis E.
Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial
title Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial
title_full Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial
title_fullStr Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial
title_full_unstemmed Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial
title_short Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial
title_sort anastomotic urethroplasty with double layer continuous running suture re-anastomosis versus interrupted suture re-anastomosis for infective bulbar urethral strictures: a prospective randomised trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9332494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35893343
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154252
work_keys_str_mv AT claassenfrederikm anastomoticurethroplastywithdoublelayercontinuousrunningsuturereanastomosisversusinterruptedsuturereanastomosisforinfectivebulbarurethralstricturesaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT martinsfranciscoe anastomoticurethroplastywithdoublelayercontinuousrunningsuturereanastomosisversusinterruptedsuturereanastomosisforinfectivebulbarurethralstricturesaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT mutambirwashingaiba anastomoticurethroplastywithdoublelayercontinuousrunningsuturereanastomosisversusinterruptedsuturereanastomosisforinfectivebulbarurethralstricturesaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT potgieterlinda anastomoticurethroplastywithdoublelayercontinuousrunningsuturereanastomosisversusinterruptedsuturereanastomosisforinfectivebulbarurethralstricturesaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT boteslezelle anastomoticurethroplastywithdoublelayercontinuousrunningsuturereanastomosisversusinterruptedsuturereanastomosisforinfectivebulbarurethralstricturesaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT kotzeharryf anastomoticurethroplastywithdoublelayercontinuousrunningsuturereanastomosisversusinterruptedsuturereanastomosisforinfectivebulbarurethralstricturesaprospectiverandomisedtrial
AT smitfrancise anastomoticurethroplastywithdoublelayercontinuousrunningsuturereanastomosisversusinterruptedsuturereanastomosisforinfectivebulbarurethralstricturesaprospectiverandomisedtrial