Cargando…
Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial
Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare a double-layer running suture re-anastomosis urethral stricture repair with early catheter removal to the conventional interrupted suture re-anastomosis after excision of a bulbar urethral stricture. Methods: A consecutive series of patients w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9332494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35893343 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154252 |
_version_ | 1784758661335220224 |
---|---|
author | Claassen, Frederik M. Martins, Francisco E. Mutambirwa, Shingai B. A. Potgieter, Linda Botes, Lezelle Kotze, Harry F. Smit, Francis E. |
author_facet | Claassen, Frederik M. Martins, Francisco E. Mutambirwa, Shingai B. A. Potgieter, Linda Botes, Lezelle Kotze, Harry F. Smit, Francis E. |
author_sort | Claassen, Frederik M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare a double-layer running suture re-anastomosis urethral stricture repair with early catheter removal to the conventional interrupted suture re-anastomosis after excision of a bulbar urethral stricture. Methods: A consecutive series of patients with bulbar urethral stricture were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized into two groups according to an odd/even serial number distribution. Patients’ medical records were analyzed for demographics, stricture characteristics, and lower urinary tract obstructive symptoms. The outcomes were based on the presence/absence of obstructive voiding symptoms, and retrograde urethrography (RGU) performed on the first post-operative day in Group 1 and in both groups (Groups 1 and 2) at six weeks after surgery. Flexible urethroscopy was only performed on specific cases where RGU was unclear both pre- and post-operatively or when clinical recurrence was suspected. The minimum follow-up (FU) was 18 months. Success was defined as no need for subsequent dilatation, direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU), or urethroplasty. Results: A total of thirty-six patients with a mean age of 45 years (range 20 to 69 years) with bulbar urethral stricture were included in this study. Group 1 and Group 2 included 19 and 17 patients, respectively. Two patients were lost during randomization and subsequently to FU. The average stricture lengths were comparable between the two groups according to the retrograde urethrogram: 1.20 cm (range 0.6 to 2) in Group 1 and 1.27 cm (range 0.5 to 2.4) in Group 2, respectively (p = 0.631). The success rate for Group 1 was 90% after a mean follow-up of thirty-six months (range 20 to 40), which was clinically significant compared to the 71% in Group 2 after a mean FU of thirty-three months (range 19 to 40; p = 0.0218; 95% CI: 0.462–41.5766). Conclusions: Anastomotic urethroplasty (AR) performed with a double layer re-anastomosis had a cure rate comparable to the conventional anastomosis with interrupted sutures after a follow-up of eighteen months and longer. The urethral catheter can be safely removed within twenty-four hours after the excision of stricture and double-layer re-anastomosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9332494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93324942022-07-29 Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial Claassen, Frederik M. Martins, Francisco E. Mutambirwa, Shingai B. A. Potgieter, Linda Botes, Lezelle Kotze, Harry F. Smit, Francis E. J Clin Med Article Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare a double-layer running suture re-anastomosis urethral stricture repair with early catheter removal to the conventional interrupted suture re-anastomosis after excision of a bulbar urethral stricture. Methods: A consecutive series of patients with bulbar urethral stricture were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized into two groups according to an odd/even serial number distribution. Patients’ medical records were analyzed for demographics, stricture characteristics, and lower urinary tract obstructive symptoms. The outcomes were based on the presence/absence of obstructive voiding symptoms, and retrograde urethrography (RGU) performed on the first post-operative day in Group 1 and in both groups (Groups 1 and 2) at six weeks after surgery. Flexible urethroscopy was only performed on specific cases where RGU was unclear both pre- and post-operatively or when clinical recurrence was suspected. The minimum follow-up (FU) was 18 months. Success was defined as no need for subsequent dilatation, direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU), or urethroplasty. Results: A total of thirty-six patients with a mean age of 45 years (range 20 to 69 years) with bulbar urethral stricture were included in this study. Group 1 and Group 2 included 19 and 17 patients, respectively. Two patients were lost during randomization and subsequently to FU. The average stricture lengths were comparable between the two groups according to the retrograde urethrogram: 1.20 cm (range 0.6 to 2) in Group 1 and 1.27 cm (range 0.5 to 2.4) in Group 2, respectively (p = 0.631). The success rate for Group 1 was 90% after a mean follow-up of thirty-six months (range 20 to 40), which was clinically significant compared to the 71% in Group 2 after a mean FU of thirty-three months (range 19 to 40; p = 0.0218; 95% CI: 0.462–41.5766). Conclusions: Anastomotic urethroplasty (AR) performed with a double layer re-anastomosis had a cure rate comparable to the conventional anastomosis with interrupted sutures after a follow-up of eighteen months and longer. The urethral catheter can be safely removed within twenty-four hours after the excision of stricture and double-layer re-anastomosis. MDPI 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9332494/ /pubmed/35893343 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154252 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Claassen, Frederik M. Martins, Francisco E. Mutambirwa, Shingai B. A. Potgieter, Linda Botes, Lezelle Kotze, Harry F. Smit, Francis E. Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial |
title | Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial |
title_full | Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial |
title_fullStr | Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial |
title_short | Anastomotic Urethroplasty with Double Layer Continuous Running Suture Re-Anastomosis Versus Interrupted Suture Re-Anastomosis for Infective Bulbar Urethral Strictures: A Prospective Randomised Trial |
title_sort | anastomotic urethroplasty with double layer continuous running suture re-anastomosis versus interrupted suture re-anastomosis for infective bulbar urethral strictures: a prospective randomised trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9332494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35893343 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT claassenfrederikm anastomoticurethroplastywithdoublelayercontinuousrunningsuturereanastomosisversusinterruptedsuturereanastomosisforinfectivebulbarurethralstricturesaprospectiverandomisedtrial AT martinsfranciscoe anastomoticurethroplastywithdoublelayercontinuousrunningsuturereanastomosisversusinterruptedsuturereanastomosisforinfectivebulbarurethralstricturesaprospectiverandomisedtrial AT mutambirwashingaiba anastomoticurethroplastywithdoublelayercontinuousrunningsuturereanastomosisversusinterruptedsuturereanastomosisforinfectivebulbarurethralstricturesaprospectiverandomisedtrial AT potgieterlinda anastomoticurethroplastywithdoublelayercontinuousrunningsuturereanastomosisversusinterruptedsuturereanastomosisforinfectivebulbarurethralstricturesaprospectiverandomisedtrial AT boteslezelle anastomoticurethroplastywithdoublelayercontinuousrunningsuturereanastomosisversusinterruptedsuturereanastomosisforinfectivebulbarurethralstricturesaprospectiverandomisedtrial AT kotzeharryf anastomoticurethroplastywithdoublelayercontinuousrunningsuturereanastomosisversusinterruptedsuturereanastomosisforinfectivebulbarurethralstricturesaprospectiverandomisedtrial AT smitfrancise anastomoticurethroplastywithdoublelayercontinuousrunningsuturereanastomosisversusinterruptedsuturereanastomosisforinfectivebulbarurethralstricturesaprospectiverandomisedtrial |