Cargando…

Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth

This study assessed the bond strength of prefabricated post systems at different root levels of endodontically treated teeth. One-rooted human premolars (N = 70; n = 10) were cut to 2 mm above the cement-enamel junction. Root canals were treated and randomly assigned to one of the seven post systems...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanzler Abdel Raouf, Valérie, Jockusch, Julia, Al-Haj Husain, Nadin, Dydyk, Nataliya, Özcan, Mutlu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9332514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35897567
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15155134
_version_ 1784758666399842304
author Kanzler Abdel Raouf, Valérie
Jockusch, Julia
Al-Haj Husain, Nadin
Dydyk, Nataliya
Özcan, Mutlu
author_facet Kanzler Abdel Raouf, Valérie
Jockusch, Julia
Al-Haj Husain, Nadin
Dydyk, Nataliya
Özcan, Mutlu
author_sort Kanzler Abdel Raouf, Valérie
collection PubMed
description This study assessed the bond strength of prefabricated post systems at different root levels of endodontically treated teeth. One-rooted human premolars (N = 70; n = 10) were cut to 2 mm above the cement-enamel junction. Root canals were treated and randomly assigned to one of the seven post systems: T: Titanium (Mooser), ZrO: Zirconia (Cosmopost), G: Fiber (FRC Postec Plus), E1: Fiber (Direct) (Everstick post), E2: Fiber (Indirect) (Everstick post), PP: Fiber (PinPost), and LP: Injectable Resin/Fiber composite (EverX Posterior). All posts were luted using a resin cement (Variolink II), and the roots were sectioned at the coronal, middle, and apical root levels. Push-out tests were performed in the Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (α = 0.05). The results showed that the bond strength (mean ± SD) of E2 posts were highest (5.3 ± 2.7) followed by PP (4.1 ± 2.0); G (4.0 ± 1.6); LP (2.6 ± 1.9): T (2.2 ± 1.5) and ZrO (1.9 ± 1.0) posts systems. No significant differences were found in bond strength of all post systems. The bond strength in the coronal root level was the highest with 3.6 ± 2.2 MPa. The bond strength of FRC post systems was significantly higher than those of rigid posts of titanium or ZrO(2). Bond strength results were the highest in the coronal root level for all tested post systems but did not differ significantly from the other two root levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9332514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93325142022-07-29 Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth Kanzler Abdel Raouf, Valérie Jockusch, Julia Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Dydyk, Nataliya Özcan, Mutlu Materials (Basel) Article This study assessed the bond strength of prefabricated post systems at different root levels of endodontically treated teeth. One-rooted human premolars (N = 70; n = 10) were cut to 2 mm above the cement-enamel junction. Root canals were treated and randomly assigned to one of the seven post systems: T: Titanium (Mooser), ZrO: Zirconia (Cosmopost), G: Fiber (FRC Postec Plus), E1: Fiber (Direct) (Everstick post), E2: Fiber (Indirect) (Everstick post), PP: Fiber (PinPost), and LP: Injectable Resin/Fiber composite (EverX Posterior). All posts were luted using a resin cement (Variolink II), and the roots were sectioned at the coronal, middle, and apical root levels. Push-out tests were performed in the Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (α = 0.05). The results showed that the bond strength (mean ± SD) of E2 posts were highest (5.3 ± 2.7) followed by PP (4.1 ± 2.0); G (4.0 ± 1.6); LP (2.6 ± 1.9): T (2.2 ± 1.5) and ZrO (1.9 ± 1.0) posts systems. No significant differences were found in bond strength of all post systems. The bond strength in the coronal root level was the highest with 3.6 ± 2.2 MPa. The bond strength of FRC post systems was significantly higher than those of rigid posts of titanium or ZrO(2). Bond strength results were the highest in the coronal root level for all tested post systems but did not differ significantly from the other two root levels. MDPI 2022-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9332514/ /pubmed/35897567 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15155134 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kanzler Abdel Raouf, Valérie
Jockusch, Julia
Al-Haj Husain, Nadin
Dydyk, Nataliya
Özcan, Mutlu
Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth
title Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth
title_full Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth
title_fullStr Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth
title_full_unstemmed Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth
title_short Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth
title_sort push-out bond strength assessment of different post systems at different radicular levels of endodontically treated teeth
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9332514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35897567
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15155134
work_keys_str_mv AT kanzlerabdelraoufvalerie pushoutbondstrengthassessmentofdifferentpostsystemsatdifferentradicularlevelsofendodonticallytreatedteeth
AT jockuschjulia pushoutbondstrengthassessmentofdifferentpostsystemsatdifferentradicularlevelsofendodonticallytreatedteeth
AT alhajhusainnadin pushoutbondstrengthassessmentofdifferentpostsystemsatdifferentradicularlevelsofendodonticallytreatedteeth
AT dydyknataliya pushoutbondstrengthassessmentofdifferentpostsystemsatdifferentradicularlevelsofendodonticallytreatedteeth
AT ozcanmutlu pushoutbondstrengthassessmentofdifferentpostsystemsatdifferentradicularlevelsofendodonticallytreatedteeth