Cargando…
Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth
This study assessed the bond strength of prefabricated post systems at different root levels of endodontically treated teeth. One-rooted human premolars (N = 70; n = 10) were cut to 2 mm above the cement-enamel junction. Root canals were treated and randomly assigned to one of the seven post systems...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9332514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35897567 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15155134 |
_version_ | 1784758666399842304 |
---|---|
author | Kanzler Abdel Raouf, Valérie Jockusch, Julia Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Dydyk, Nataliya Özcan, Mutlu |
author_facet | Kanzler Abdel Raouf, Valérie Jockusch, Julia Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Dydyk, Nataliya Özcan, Mutlu |
author_sort | Kanzler Abdel Raouf, Valérie |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study assessed the bond strength of prefabricated post systems at different root levels of endodontically treated teeth. One-rooted human premolars (N = 70; n = 10) were cut to 2 mm above the cement-enamel junction. Root canals were treated and randomly assigned to one of the seven post systems: T: Titanium (Mooser), ZrO: Zirconia (Cosmopost), G: Fiber (FRC Postec Plus), E1: Fiber (Direct) (Everstick post), E2: Fiber (Indirect) (Everstick post), PP: Fiber (PinPost), and LP: Injectable Resin/Fiber composite (EverX Posterior). All posts were luted using a resin cement (Variolink II), and the roots were sectioned at the coronal, middle, and apical root levels. Push-out tests were performed in the Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (α = 0.05). The results showed that the bond strength (mean ± SD) of E2 posts were highest (5.3 ± 2.7) followed by PP (4.1 ± 2.0); G (4.0 ± 1.6); LP (2.6 ± 1.9): T (2.2 ± 1.5) and ZrO (1.9 ± 1.0) posts systems. No significant differences were found in bond strength of all post systems. The bond strength in the coronal root level was the highest with 3.6 ± 2.2 MPa. The bond strength of FRC post systems was significantly higher than those of rigid posts of titanium or ZrO(2). Bond strength results were the highest in the coronal root level for all tested post systems but did not differ significantly from the other two root levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9332514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93325142022-07-29 Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth Kanzler Abdel Raouf, Valérie Jockusch, Julia Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Dydyk, Nataliya Özcan, Mutlu Materials (Basel) Article This study assessed the bond strength of prefabricated post systems at different root levels of endodontically treated teeth. One-rooted human premolars (N = 70; n = 10) were cut to 2 mm above the cement-enamel junction. Root canals were treated and randomly assigned to one of the seven post systems: T: Titanium (Mooser), ZrO: Zirconia (Cosmopost), G: Fiber (FRC Postec Plus), E1: Fiber (Direct) (Everstick post), E2: Fiber (Indirect) (Everstick post), PP: Fiber (PinPost), and LP: Injectable Resin/Fiber composite (EverX Posterior). All posts were luted using a resin cement (Variolink II), and the roots were sectioned at the coronal, middle, and apical root levels. Push-out tests were performed in the Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (α = 0.05). The results showed that the bond strength (mean ± SD) of E2 posts were highest (5.3 ± 2.7) followed by PP (4.1 ± 2.0); G (4.0 ± 1.6); LP (2.6 ± 1.9): T (2.2 ± 1.5) and ZrO (1.9 ± 1.0) posts systems. No significant differences were found in bond strength of all post systems. The bond strength in the coronal root level was the highest with 3.6 ± 2.2 MPa. The bond strength of FRC post systems was significantly higher than those of rigid posts of titanium or ZrO(2). Bond strength results were the highest in the coronal root level for all tested post systems but did not differ significantly from the other two root levels. MDPI 2022-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9332514/ /pubmed/35897567 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15155134 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kanzler Abdel Raouf, Valérie Jockusch, Julia Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Dydyk, Nataliya Özcan, Mutlu Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth |
title | Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth |
title_full | Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth |
title_fullStr | Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth |
title_full_unstemmed | Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth |
title_short | Push-Out Bond Strength Assessment of Different Post Systems at Different Radicular Levels of Endodontically Treated Teeth |
title_sort | push-out bond strength assessment of different post systems at different radicular levels of endodontically treated teeth |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9332514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35897567 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15155134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanzlerabdelraoufvalerie pushoutbondstrengthassessmentofdifferentpostsystemsatdifferentradicularlevelsofendodonticallytreatedteeth AT jockuschjulia pushoutbondstrengthassessmentofdifferentpostsystemsatdifferentradicularlevelsofendodonticallytreatedteeth AT alhajhusainnadin pushoutbondstrengthassessmentofdifferentpostsystemsatdifferentradicularlevelsofendodonticallytreatedteeth AT dydyknataliya pushoutbondstrengthassessmentofdifferentpostsystemsatdifferentradicularlevelsofendodonticallytreatedteeth AT ozcanmutlu pushoutbondstrengthassessmentofdifferentpostsystemsatdifferentradicularlevelsofendodonticallytreatedteeth |