Cargando…

Agreement between the biometric measurements used to calculate the size of the implantable collamer lenses measured with four different technologies

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement between the biometric measurements used to calculate the size of the implantable collamer lenses (ICL) with different technologies: swept-source optical coherence tomography, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug tomography. METHODS: This re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calvo-Sanz, Jorge A, Poyales, Francisco, Zhou, Ying, Arias-Puente, Alfonso, Garzón, Nuria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9333023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35502031
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2217_21
_version_ 1784758790163267584
author Calvo-Sanz, Jorge A
Poyales, Francisco
Zhou, Ying
Arias-Puente, Alfonso
Garzón, Nuria
author_facet Calvo-Sanz, Jorge A
Poyales, Francisco
Zhou, Ying
Arias-Puente, Alfonso
Garzón, Nuria
author_sort Calvo-Sanz, Jorge A
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement between the biometric measurements used to calculate the size of the implantable collamer lenses (ICL) with different technologies: swept-source optical coherence tomography, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug tomography. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included subjects undergoing refractive surgery with posterior chamber phakic IOL implantation to correct their myopia. The anterior chamber depth (ACD) and the horizontal white to white (WTW) or the angle to angle (ATA) distance were measured with the following four devices: the IOLMaster 700 biometer (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), based on swept-source optical coherence tomography; the Cirrus and Visante optical coherence tomographs (Carl Zeiss Meditec) based on low-coherence interferometry; and the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: In the horizontal corneal diameter measurements, there were statistically significant differences between Pentacam–IOLMaster 700 pair (P < 0.001) and Pentacam–Visante pair (P < 0.001). WTW from CIRRUS showed the lowest correlation when paired with Pentacam and IOLMaster 700 (R(2) = 0.452 and 0.385 for Visante and R(2) = 0.494 and 0.426 for Cirrus). Regarding the linear correlation of the ACD measurements, all pairs of devices were statistically significant and all of them showed a very good correlation index. CONCLUSION: There is a good agreement between the different devices under evaluation for ACD measurements. As for WTW, the values measured with the different devices showed large discrepancies with low correlation levels, especially when comparing the tomographs with the other devices under evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9333023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93330232022-07-29 Agreement between the biometric measurements used to calculate the size of the implantable collamer lenses measured with four different technologies Calvo-Sanz, Jorge A Poyales, Francisco Zhou, Ying Arias-Puente, Alfonso Garzón, Nuria Indian J Ophthalmol Special Focus, Refractive Surgery, Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement between the biometric measurements used to calculate the size of the implantable collamer lenses (ICL) with different technologies: swept-source optical coherence tomography, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug tomography. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included subjects undergoing refractive surgery with posterior chamber phakic IOL implantation to correct their myopia. The anterior chamber depth (ACD) and the horizontal white to white (WTW) or the angle to angle (ATA) distance were measured with the following four devices: the IOLMaster 700 biometer (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), based on swept-source optical coherence tomography; the Cirrus and Visante optical coherence tomographs (Carl Zeiss Meditec) based on low-coherence interferometry; and the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: In the horizontal corneal diameter measurements, there were statistically significant differences between Pentacam–IOLMaster 700 pair (P < 0.001) and Pentacam–Visante pair (P < 0.001). WTW from CIRRUS showed the lowest correlation when paired with Pentacam and IOLMaster 700 (R(2) = 0.452 and 0.385 for Visante and R(2) = 0.494 and 0.426 for Cirrus). Regarding the linear correlation of the ACD measurements, all pairs of devices were statistically significant and all of them showed a very good correlation index. CONCLUSION: There is a good agreement between the different devices under evaluation for ACD measurements. As for WTW, the values measured with the different devices showed large discrepancies with low correlation levels, especially when comparing the tomographs with the other devices under evaluation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-05 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9333023/ /pubmed/35502031 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2217_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Special Focus, Refractive Surgery, Original Article
Calvo-Sanz, Jorge A
Poyales, Francisco
Zhou, Ying
Arias-Puente, Alfonso
Garzón, Nuria
Agreement between the biometric measurements used to calculate the size of the implantable collamer lenses measured with four different technologies
title Agreement between the biometric measurements used to calculate the size of the implantable collamer lenses measured with four different technologies
title_full Agreement between the biometric measurements used to calculate the size of the implantable collamer lenses measured with four different technologies
title_fullStr Agreement between the biometric measurements used to calculate the size of the implantable collamer lenses measured with four different technologies
title_full_unstemmed Agreement between the biometric measurements used to calculate the size of the implantable collamer lenses measured with four different technologies
title_short Agreement between the biometric measurements used to calculate the size of the implantable collamer lenses measured with four different technologies
title_sort agreement between the biometric measurements used to calculate the size of the implantable collamer lenses measured with four different technologies
topic Special Focus, Refractive Surgery, Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9333023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35502031
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2217_21
work_keys_str_mv AT calvosanzjorgea agreementbetweenthebiometricmeasurementsusedtocalculatethesizeoftheimplantablecollamerlensesmeasuredwithfourdifferenttechnologies
AT poyalesfrancisco agreementbetweenthebiometricmeasurementsusedtocalculatethesizeoftheimplantablecollamerlensesmeasuredwithfourdifferenttechnologies
AT zhouying agreementbetweenthebiometricmeasurementsusedtocalculatethesizeoftheimplantablecollamerlensesmeasuredwithfourdifferenttechnologies
AT ariaspuentealfonso agreementbetweenthebiometricmeasurementsusedtocalculatethesizeoftheimplantablecollamerlensesmeasuredwithfourdifferenttechnologies
AT garzonnuria agreementbetweenthebiometricmeasurementsusedtocalculatethesizeoftheimplantablecollamerlensesmeasuredwithfourdifferenttechnologies