Cargando…
Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series
BACKGROUND: Meningioma surgery has evolved over the last 20 years with increased use of minimally invasive approaches including the endoscopic endonasal route and endoscope-assisted and gravity-assisted transcranial approaches. As the “keyhole” concept remains controversial, we present detailed outc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9333232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35901061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264053 |
_version_ | 1784758827339481088 |
---|---|
author | Thakur, Jai Deep Mallari, Regin Jay Corlin, Alex Yawitz, Samantha Eisenberg, Amalia Rhee, John Sivakumar, Walavan Krauss, Howard Martin, Neil Griffiths, Chester Barkhoudarian, Garni Kelly, Daniel F. |
author_facet | Thakur, Jai Deep Mallari, Regin Jay Corlin, Alex Yawitz, Samantha Eisenberg, Amalia Rhee, John Sivakumar, Walavan Krauss, Howard Martin, Neil Griffiths, Chester Barkhoudarian, Garni Kelly, Daniel F. |
author_sort | Thakur, Jai Deep |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Meningioma surgery has evolved over the last 20 years with increased use of minimally invasive approaches including the endoscopic endonasal route and endoscope-assisted and gravity-assisted transcranial approaches. As the “keyhole” concept remains controversial, we present detailed outcomes in a cohort series. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was done for all patients undergoing meningioma removal at a tertiary brain tumor referral center from 2008–2021. Keyhole approaches were defined as: use of a minimally invasive “retractorless” approach for a given meningioma in which a traditional larger approach is often used instead. The surgical goal was maximal safe removal including conservative (subtotal) removal for some invasive locations. Primary outcomes were resection rates, complications, length of stay and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Secondary outcomes were endoscopy use, perioperative treatments, tumor control and acute MRI FLAIR/T2 changes to assess for brain manipulation and retraction injury. RESULTS: Of 329 patients, keyhole approaches were utilized in 193(59%) patients (mean age 59±13; 30 (15.5%) had prior surgery) who underwent 213 operations; 205(96%) were skull base location. Approaches included: endoscopic endonasal (n = 74,35%), supraorbital (n = 73,34%), retromastoid (n = 38,18%), mini-pterional (n = 20,9%), suboccipital (n = 4,2%), and contralateral transfalcine (n = 4,2%). Primary outcomes: Gross total/near total (>90%) resection was achieved in 125(59%) (5% for petroclival, cavernous sinus/Meckel’s cave, spheno-cavernous locations vs 77% for all other locations). Major complications included: permanent neurological worsening 12(6%), CSF leak 2(1%) meningitis 2(1%). There were no DVTs, PEs, MIs or 30-day mortality. Median LOS decreased from 3 to 2 days in the last 2 years; 94% were discharged to home with favorable 90-day KPS in 176(96%) patients. Secondary outcomes: Increased FLAIR/T2 changes were noted on POD#1/2 MRI in 36/213(17%) cases, resolving in all but 11 (5.2%). Endoscopy was used in 87/139(63%) craniotomies, facilitating additional tumor removal in 55%. Tumor progression occurred in 26(13%) patients, mean follow-up 42±36 months. CONCLUSIONS & RELEVANCE: Our experience suggests minimally invasive keyhole transcranial and endoscopic endonasal meningioma removal is associated with comparable resection rates and low complication rates, short hospitalizations and high 90-day performance scores in comparison to prior reports using traditional skull base approaches. Subtotal removal may be appropriate for invasive/adherent meningiomas to avoid neurological deficits and other post-operative complications, although longer follow-up is needed. With careful patient selection and requisite experience, these approaches may be considered reasonable alternatives to traditional transcranial approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9333232 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93332322022-07-29 Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series Thakur, Jai Deep Mallari, Regin Jay Corlin, Alex Yawitz, Samantha Eisenberg, Amalia Rhee, John Sivakumar, Walavan Krauss, Howard Martin, Neil Griffiths, Chester Barkhoudarian, Garni Kelly, Daniel F. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Meningioma surgery has evolved over the last 20 years with increased use of minimally invasive approaches including the endoscopic endonasal route and endoscope-assisted and gravity-assisted transcranial approaches. As the “keyhole” concept remains controversial, we present detailed outcomes in a cohort series. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was done for all patients undergoing meningioma removal at a tertiary brain tumor referral center from 2008–2021. Keyhole approaches were defined as: use of a minimally invasive “retractorless” approach for a given meningioma in which a traditional larger approach is often used instead. The surgical goal was maximal safe removal including conservative (subtotal) removal for some invasive locations. Primary outcomes were resection rates, complications, length of stay and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Secondary outcomes were endoscopy use, perioperative treatments, tumor control and acute MRI FLAIR/T2 changes to assess for brain manipulation and retraction injury. RESULTS: Of 329 patients, keyhole approaches were utilized in 193(59%) patients (mean age 59±13; 30 (15.5%) had prior surgery) who underwent 213 operations; 205(96%) were skull base location. Approaches included: endoscopic endonasal (n = 74,35%), supraorbital (n = 73,34%), retromastoid (n = 38,18%), mini-pterional (n = 20,9%), suboccipital (n = 4,2%), and contralateral transfalcine (n = 4,2%). Primary outcomes: Gross total/near total (>90%) resection was achieved in 125(59%) (5% for petroclival, cavernous sinus/Meckel’s cave, spheno-cavernous locations vs 77% for all other locations). Major complications included: permanent neurological worsening 12(6%), CSF leak 2(1%) meningitis 2(1%). There were no DVTs, PEs, MIs or 30-day mortality. Median LOS decreased from 3 to 2 days in the last 2 years; 94% were discharged to home with favorable 90-day KPS in 176(96%) patients. Secondary outcomes: Increased FLAIR/T2 changes were noted on POD#1/2 MRI in 36/213(17%) cases, resolving in all but 11 (5.2%). Endoscopy was used in 87/139(63%) craniotomies, facilitating additional tumor removal in 55%. Tumor progression occurred in 26(13%) patients, mean follow-up 42±36 months. CONCLUSIONS & RELEVANCE: Our experience suggests minimally invasive keyhole transcranial and endoscopic endonasal meningioma removal is associated with comparable resection rates and low complication rates, short hospitalizations and high 90-day performance scores in comparison to prior reports using traditional skull base approaches. Subtotal removal may be appropriate for invasive/adherent meningiomas to avoid neurological deficits and other post-operative complications, although longer follow-up is needed. With careful patient selection and requisite experience, these approaches may be considered reasonable alternatives to traditional transcranial approaches. Public Library of Science 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9333232/ /pubmed/35901061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264053 Text en © 2022 Thakur et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Thakur, Jai Deep Mallari, Regin Jay Corlin, Alex Yawitz, Samantha Eisenberg, Amalia Rhee, John Sivakumar, Walavan Krauss, Howard Martin, Neil Griffiths, Chester Barkhoudarian, Garni Kelly, Daniel F. Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series |
title | Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series |
title_full | Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series |
title_fullStr | Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series |
title_short | Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series |
title_sort | critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9333232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35901061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thakurjaideep criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries AT mallarireginjay criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries AT corlinalex criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries AT yawitzsamantha criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries AT eisenbergamalia criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries AT rheejohn criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries AT sivakumarwalavan criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries AT krausshoward criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries AT martinneil criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries AT griffithschester criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries AT barkhoudariangarni criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries AT kellydanielf criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries |