Cargando…

Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series

BACKGROUND: Meningioma surgery has evolved over the last 20 years with increased use of minimally invasive approaches including the endoscopic endonasal route and endoscope-assisted and gravity-assisted transcranial approaches. As the “keyhole” concept remains controversial, we present detailed outc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thakur, Jai Deep, Mallari, Regin Jay, Corlin, Alex, Yawitz, Samantha, Eisenberg, Amalia, Rhee, John, Sivakumar, Walavan, Krauss, Howard, Martin, Neil, Griffiths, Chester, Barkhoudarian, Garni, Kelly, Daniel F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9333232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35901061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264053
_version_ 1784758827339481088
author Thakur, Jai Deep
Mallari, Regin Jay
Corlin, Alex
Yawitz, Samantha
Eisenberg, Amalia
Rhee, John
Sivakumar, Walavan
Krauss, Howard
Martin, Neil
Griffiths, Chester
Barkhoudarian, Garni
Kelly, Daniel F.
author_facet Thakur, Jai Deep
Mallari, Regin Jay
Corlin, Alex
Yawitz, Samantha
Eisenberg, Amalia
Rhee, John
Sivakumar, Walavan
Krauss, Howard
Martin, Neil
Griffiths, Chester
Barkhoudarian, Garni
Kelly, Daniel F.
author_sort Thakur, Jai Deep
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Meningioma surgery has evolved over the last 20 years with increased use of minimally invasive approaches including the endoscopic endonasal route and endoscope-assisted and gravity-assisted transcranial approaches. As the “keyhole” concept remains controversial, we present detailed outcomes in a cohort series. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was done for all patients undergoing meningioma removal at a tertiary brain tumor referral center from 2008–2021. Keyhole approaches were defined as: use of a minimally invasive “retractorless” approach for a given meningioma in which a traditional larger approach is often used instead. The surgical goal was maximal safe removal including conservative (subtotal) removal for some invasive locations. Primary outcomes were resection rates, complications, length of stay and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Secondary outcomes were endoscopy use, perioperative treatments, tumor control and acute MRI FLAIR/T2 changes to assess for brain manipulation and retraction injury. RESULTS: Of 329 patients, keyhole approaches were utilized in 193(59%) patients (mean age 59±13; 30 (15.5%) had prior surgery) who underwent 213 operations; 205(96%) were skull base location. Approaches included: endoscopic endonasal (n = 74,35%), supraorbital (n = 73,34%), retromastoid (n = 38,18%), mini-pterional (n = 20,9%), suboccipital (n = 4,2%), and contralateral transfalcine (n = 4,2%). Primary outcomes: Gross total/near total (>90%) resection was achieved in 125(59%) (5% for petroclival, cavernous sinus/Meckel’s cave, spheno-cavernous locations vs 77% for all other locations). Major complications included: permanent neurological worsening 12(6%), CSF leak 2(1%) meningitis 2(1%). There were no DVTs, PEs, MIs or 30-day mortality. Median LOS decreased from 3 to 2 days in the last 2 years; 94% were discharged to home with favorable 90-day KPS in 176(96%) patients. Secondary outcomes: Increased FLAIR/T2 changes were noted on POD#1/2 MRI in 36/213(17%) cases, resolving in all but 11 (5.2%). Endoscopy was used in 87/139(63%) craniotomies, facilitating additional tumor removal in 55%. Tumor progression occurred in 26(13%) patients, mean follow-up 42±36 months. CONCLUSIONS & RELEVANCE: Our experience suggests minimally invasive keyhole transcranial and endoscopic endonasal meningioma removal is associated with comparable resection rates and low complication rates, short hospitalizations and high 90-day performance scores in comparison to prior reports using traditional skull base approaches. Subtotal removal may be appropriate for invasive/adherent meningiomas to avoid neurological deficits and other post-operative complications, although longer follow-up is needed. With careful patient selection and requisite experience, these approaches may be considered reasonable alternatives to traditional transcranial approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9333232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93332322022-07-29 Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series Thakur, Jai Deep Mallari, Regin Jay Corlin, Alex Yawitz, Samantha Eisenberg, Amalia Rhee, John Sivakumar, Walavan Krauss, Howard Martin, Neil Griffiths, Chester Barkhoudarian, Garni Kelly, Daniel F. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Meningioma surgery has evolved over the last 20 years with increased use of minimally invasive approaches including the endoscopic endonasal route and endoscope-assisted and gravity-assisted transcranial approaches. As the “keyhole” concept remains controversial, we present detailed outcomes in a cohort series. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was done for all patients undergoing meningioma removal at a tertiary brain tumor referral center from 2008–2021. Keyhole approaches were defined as: use of a minimally invasive “retractorless” approach for a given meningioma in which a traditional larger approach is often used instead. The surgical goal was maximal safe removal including conservative (subtotal) removal for some invasive locations. Primary outcomes were resection rates, complications, length of stay and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Secondary outcomes were endoscopy use, perioperative treatments, tumor control and acute MRI FLAIR/T2 changes to assess for brain manipulation and retraction injury. RESULTS: Of 329 patients, keyhole approaches were utilized in 193(59%) patients (mean age 59±13; 30 (15.5%) had prior surgery) who underwent 213 operations; 205(96%) were skull base location. Approaches included: endoscopic endonasal (n = 74,35%), supraorbital (n = 73,34%), retromastoid (n = 38,18%), mini-pterional (n = 20,9%), suboccipital (n = 4,2%), and contralateral transfalcine (n = 4,2%). Primary outcomes: Gross total/near total (>90%) resection was achieved in 125(59%) (5% for petroclival, cavernous sinus/Meckel’s cave, spheno-cavernous locations vs 77% for all other locations). Major complications included: permanent neurological worsening 12(6%), CSF leak 2(1%) meningitis 2(1%). There were no DVTs, PEs, MIs or 30-day mortality. Median LOS decreased from 3 to 2 days in the last 2 years; 94% were discharged to home with favorable 90-day KPS in 176(96%) patients. Secondary outcomes: Increased FLAIR/T2 changes were noted on POD#1/2 MRI in 36/213(17%) cases, resolving in all but 11 (5.2%). Endoscopy was used in 87/139(63%) craniotomies, facilitating additional tumor removal in 55%. Tumor progression occurred in 26(13%) patients, mean follow-up 42±36 months. CONCLUSIONS & RELEVANCE: Our experience suggests minimally invasive keyhole transcranial and endoscopic endonasal meningioma removal is associated with comparable resection rates and low complication rates, short hospitalizations and high 90-day performance scores in comparison to prior reports using traditional skull base approaches. Subtotal removal may be appropriate for invasive/adherent meningiomas to avoid neurological deficits and other post-operative complications, although longer follow-up is needed. With careful patient selection and requisite experience, these approaches may be considered reasonable alternatives to traditional transcranial approaches. Public Library of Science 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9333232/ /pubmed/35901061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264053 Text en © 2022 Thakur et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thakur, Jai Deep
Mallari, Regin Jay
Corlin, Alex
Yawitz, Samantha
Eisenberg, Amalia
Rhee, John
Sivakumar, Walavan
Krauss, Howard
Martin, Neil
Griffiths, Chester
Barkhoudarian, Garni
Kelly, Daniel F.
Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series
title Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series
title_full Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series
title_fullStr Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series
title_full_unstemmed Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series
title_short Critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series
title_sort critical appraisal of minimally invasive keyhole surgery for intracranial meningioma in a large case series
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9333232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35901061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264053
work_keys_str_mv AT thakurjaideep criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries
AT mallarireginjay criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries
AT corlinalex criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries
AT yawitzsamantha criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries
AT eisenbergamalia criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries
AT rheejohn criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries
AT sivakumarwalavan criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries
AT krausshoward criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries
AT martinneil criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries
AT griffithschester criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries
AT barkhoudariangarni criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries
AT kellydanielf criticalappraisalofminimallyinvasivekeyholesurgeryforintracranialmeningiomainalargecaseseries