측정도구의 심리계량적 속성 2: 구조타당도, 내적일관성 및 교차문화타당도/측정동일성

Structural validity, internal consistency, and cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance are psychometric properties of the internal structure of an instrument. In psychometric studies published in Korean nursing journals, structural validity has mainly been assessed using confirmatory factor a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Women Health Nursing 2021
Materias:
Invited Paper
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36313138
http://dx.doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2021.05.18
_version_ 1784759045357305856
collection PubMed
description Structural validity, internal consistency, and cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance are psychometric properties of the internal structure of an instrument. In psychometric studies published in Korean nursing journals, structural validity has mainly been assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance has rarely been evaluated. It is recommended for Korean nursing researchers to evaluate the internal structure of instruments using a greater variety of methods, such as item response theory, Rasch analysis, multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, and differential item functioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9334182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Society of Women Health Nursing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93341822022-10-28 측정도구의 심리계량적 속성 2: 구조타당도, 내적일관성 및 교차문화타당도/측정동일성 Korean J Women Health Nurs Invited Paper Structural validity, internal consistency, and cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance are psychometric properties of the internal structure of an instrument. In psychometric studies published in Korean nursing journals, structural validity has mainly been assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance has rarely been evaluated. It is recommended for Korean nursing researchers to evaluate the internal structure of instruments using a greater variety of methods, such as item response theory, Rasch analysis, multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, and differential item functioning. Korean Society of Women Health Nursing 2021-06-30 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9334182/ /pubmed/36313138 http://dx.doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2021.05.18 Text en Copyright © 2021 Korean Society of Women Health Nursing https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Invited Paper
측정도구의 심리계량적 속성 2: 구조타당도, 내적일관성 및 교차문화타당도/측정동일성
title 측정도구의 심리계량적 속성 2: 구조타당도, 내적일관성 및 교차문화타당도/측정동일성
title_full 측정도구의 심리계량적 속성 2: 구조타당도, 내적일관성 및 교차문화타당도/측정동일성
title_fullStr 측정도구의 심리계량적 속성 2: 구조타당도, 내적일관성 및 교차문화타당도/측정동일성
title_full_unstemmed 측정도구의 심리계량적 속성 2: 구조타당도, 내적일관성 및 교차문화타당도/측정동일성
title_short 측정도구의 심리계량적 속성 2: 구조타당도, 내적일관성 및 교차문화타당도/측정동일성
title_sort 측정도구의 심리계량적 속성 2: 구조타당도, 내적일관성 및 교차문화타당도/측정동일성
topic Invited Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36313138
http://dx.doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2021.05.18
work_keys_str_mv AT cheugjeongdoguuisimligyelyangjeogsogseong2gujotadangdonaejeogilgwanseongmichgyochamunhwatadangdocheugjeongdongilseong

Ejemplares similares