Cargando…
Variation in inhibitory control does not influence social rank, foraging efficiency, or risk taking, in red junglefowl females
Individual variation in cognition, seen in many taxa, is not well understood, despite its potential evolutionary consequences. Inhibitory control is an aspect of cognition which differs between individuals. However, how selection could act on this variation remains unclear. First, individual consist...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35122185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01598-5 |
_version_ | 1784759090817269760 |
---|---|
author | Garnham, Laura Clare Boddington, Robert Løvlie, Hanne |
author_facet | Garnham, Laura Clare Boddington, Robert Løvlie, Hanne |
author_sort | Garnham, Laura Clare |
collection | PubMed |
description | Individual variation in cognition, seen in many taxa, is not well understood, despite its potential evolutionary consequences. Inhibitory control is an aspect of cognition which differs between individuals. However, how selection could act on this variation remains unclear. First, individual consistency over time of behaviours affected by inhibitory control, and how these behaviours relate to each other, is not well understood. Second, consequences in ecologically relevant contexts of variation in behaviours affected by inhibitory control, are scarcely investigated. Therefore, we explored the temporal consistency and inter-relatedness of two behaviours influenced by inhibitory control (impulsive action and persistence) and how these link to social rank, foraging efficiency, and risk taking in adult female red junglefowl (Gallus gallus). We measured impulsive action in a detour test, and persistence in both a detour test and a foraging test. Impulsive action and persistence, measured in a detour test, were moderately consistent over time, and positively correlated. This implies that selection could act on inhibitory control via these behaviours, and selection on one behaviour could affect the other. However, we found no evidence of links between inhibitory control and social rank, foraging efficiency, or risk taking. This implies that selection may not act on inhibitory control via these measures, and that, in general, there may be a lack of strong selection on inhibitory control. This, in turn, could help explain individual variation in this aspect of cognition. Future research should explore the specificity of when inhibitory control has implications for individuals, and continue to investigate how variation in cognitive traits influences how individuals behave in contexts with potential evolutionary implications. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10071-022-01598-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9334373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93343732022-07-30 Variation in inhibitory control does not influence social rank, foraging efficiency, or risk taking, in red junglefowl females Garnham, Laura Clare Boddington, Robert Løvlie, Hanne Anim Cogn Original Paper Individual variation in cognition, seen in many taxa, is not well understood, despite its potential evolutionary consequences. Inhibitory control is an aspect of cognition which differs between individuals. However, how selection could act on this variation remains unclear. First, individual consistency over time of behaviours affected by inhibitory control, and how these behaviours relate to each other, is not well understood. Second, consequences in ecologically relevant contexts of variation in behaviours affected by inhibitory control, are scarcely investigated. Therefore, we explored the temporal consistency and inter-relatedness of two behaviours influenced by inhibitory control (impulsive action and persistence) and how these link to social rank, foraging efficiency, and risk taking in adult female red junglefowl (Gallus gallus). We measured impulsive action in a detour test, and persistence in both a detour test and a foraging test. Impulsive action and persistence, measured in a detour test, were moderately consistent over time, and positively correlated. This implies that selection could act on inhibitory control via these behaviours, and selection on one behaviour could affect the other. However, we found no evidence of links between inhibitory control and social rank, foraging efficiency, or risk taking. This implies that selection may not act on inhibitory control via these measures, and that, in general, there may be a lack of strong selection on inhibitory control. This, in turn, could help explain individual variation in this aspect of cognition. Future research should explore the specificity of when inhibitory control has implications for individuals, and continue to investigate how variation in cognitive traits influences how individuals behave in contexts with potential evolutionary implications. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10071-022-01598-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9334373/ /pubmed/35122185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01598-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Garnham, Laura Clare Boddington, Robert Løvlie, Hanne Variation in inhibitory control does not influence social rank, foraging efficiency, or risk taking, in red junglefowl females |
title | Variation in inhibitory control does not influence social rank, foraging efficiency, or risk taking, in red junglefowl females |
title_full | Variation in inhibitory control does not influence social rank, foraging efficiency, or risk taking, in red junglefowl females |
title_fullStr | Variation in inhibitory control does not influence social rank, foraging efficiency, or risk taking, in red junglefowl females |
title_full_unstemmed | Variation in inhibitory control does not influence social rank, foraging efficiency, or risk taking, in red junglefowl females |
title_short | Variation in inhibitory control does not influence social rank, foraging efficiency, or risk taking, in red junglefowl females |
title_sort | variation in inhibitory control does not influence social rank, foraging efficiency, or risk taking, in red junglefowl females |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35122185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01598-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garnhamlauraclare variationininhibitorycontroldoesnotinfluencesocialrankforagingefficiencyorrisktakinginredjunglefowlfemales AT boddingtonrobert variationininhibitorycontroldoesnotinfluencesocialrankforagingefficiencyorrisktakinginredjunglefowlfemales AT løvliehanne variationininhibitorycontroldoesnotinfluencesocialrankforagingefficiencyorrisktakinginredjunglefowlfemales |