Cargando…

Real-world anticoagulatory treatment after percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip: a retrospective, observational study on 1300 patients

AIMS: This study sought to investigate current anticoagulatory treatment patterns and clinical outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (MitraClip). METHODS AND RESULTS: In a retrospective study of a German claims database (InGef research database), anticoagulatory treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hohmann, Christopher, Ludwig, Marion, Walker, Jochen, Iliadis, Christos, Schipper, Jan-Hendrik, Baldus, Stephan, Pfister, Roman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35220447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-01988-2
_version_ 1784759096972410880
author Hohmann, Christopher
Ludwig, Marion
Walker, Jochen
Iliadis, Christos
Schipper, Jan-Hendrik
Baldus, Stephan
Pfister, Roman
author_facet Hohmann, Christopher
Ludwig, Marion
Walker, Jochen
Iliadis, Christos
Schipper, Jan-Hendrik
Baldus, Stephan
Pfister, Roman
author_sort Hohmann, Christopher
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This study sought to investigate current anticoagulatory treatment patterns and clinical outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (MitraClip). METHODS AND RESULTS: In a retrospective study of a German claims database (InGef research database), anticoagulatory treatment regimens were assessed using any drug prescription post discharge within the first 90 days after MitraClip procedure. Clinical events between 30 days and 6 months were examined by treatment regime. The study population comprised 1342 patients undergoing MitraClip procedure between 2014 and 2018. 22.4% received antiplatelet monotherapy, 20.8% oral anticoagulation (OAC) plus antiplatelet therapy, 19.4% OAC monotherapy, 11.7% dual antiplatelet therapy, 2.8% triple therapy and 21.0% did not receive any anticoagulatory drugs. 63% of patients with OAC received non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC). A total of 168 patients were newly prescribed OAC after MitraClip, of whom 12 patients (7.1%) had no diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. 40% of patients with OAC prior to MitraClip did not have any OAC after MitraClip. The adjusted risk of all-cause mortality was significantly increased in patients with no anticoagulatory treatment (HR 3.84, 95% CI 2.33–6.33, p < 0.0001) when compared to antiplatelet monotherapy whereas the other regimes were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: This large real-world data analysis demonstrates a heterogeneous spectrum of prescriptions for anticoagulant therapies after MitraClip. Considering relevant differences in clinical outcome across treatment groups, major effort is warranted for controlled trials in order to establish evidence-based recommendations on anticoagulatory treatment after percutaneous mitral valve repair. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-01988-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9334399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93343992022-07-30 Real-world anticoagulatory treatment after percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip: a retrospective, observational study on 1300 patients Hohmann, Christopher Ludwig, Marion Walker, Jochen Iliadis, Christos Schipper, Jan-Hendrik Baldus, Stephan Pfister, Roman Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper AIMS: This study sought to investigate current anticoagulatory treatment patterns and clinical outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (MitraClip). METHODS AND RESULTS: In a retrospective study of a German claims database (InGef research database), anticoagulatory treatment regimens were assessed using any drug prescription post discharge within the first 90 days after MitraClip procedure. Clinical events between 30 days and 6 months were examined by treatment regime. The study population comprised 1342 patients undergoing MitraClip procedure between 2014 and 2018. 22.4% received antiplatelet monotherapy, 20.8% oral anticoagulation (OAC) plus antiplatelet therapy, 19.4% OAC monotherapy, 11.7% dual antiplatelet therapy, 2.8% triple therapy and 21.0% did not receive any anticoagulatory drugs. 63% of patients with OAC received non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC). A total of 168 patients were newly prescribed OAC after MitraClip, of whom 12 patients (7.1%) had no diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. 40% of patients with OAC prior to MitraClip did not have any OAC after MitraClip. The adjusted risk of all-cause mortality was significantly increased in patients with no anticoagulatory treatment (HR 3.84, 95% CI 2.33–6.33, p < 0.0001) when compared to antiplatelet monotherapy whereas the other regimes were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: This large real-world data analysis demonstrates a heterogeneous spectrum of prescriptions for anticoagulant therapies after MitraClip. Considering relevant differences in clinical outcome across treatment groups, major effort is warranted for controlled trials in order to establish evidence-based recommendations on anticoagulatory treatment after percutaneous mitral valve repair. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-01988-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9334399/ /pubmed/35220447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-01988-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hohmann, Christopher
Ludwig, Marion
Walker, Jochen
Iliadis, Christos
Schipper, Jan-Hendrik
Baldus, Stephan
Pfister, Roman
Real-world anticoagulatory treatment after percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip: a retrospective, observational study on 1300 patients
title Real-world anticoagulatory treatment after percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip: a retrospective, observational study on 1300 patients
title_full Real-world anticoagulatory treatment after percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip: a retrospective, observational study on 1300 patients
title_fullStr Real-world anticoagulatory treatment after percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip: a retrospective, observational study on 1300 patients
title_full_unstemmed Real-world anticoagulatory treatment after percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip: a retrospective, observational study on 1300 patients
title_short Real-world anticoagulatory treatment after percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip: a retrospective, observational study on 1300 patients
title_sort real-world anticoagulatory treatment after percutaneous mitral valve repair using mitraclip: a retrospective, observational study on 1300 patients
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35220447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-01988-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hohmannchristopher realworldanticoagulatorytreatmentafterpercutaneousmitralvalverepairusingmitracliparetrospectiveobservationalstudyon1300patients
AT ludwigmarion realworldanticoagulatorytreatmentafterpercutaneousmitralvalverepairusingmitracliparetrospectiveobservationalstudyon1300patients
AT walkerjochen realworldanticoagulatorytreatmentafterpercutaneousmitralvalverepairusingmitracliparetrospectiveobservationalstudyon1300patients
AT iliadischristos realworldanticoagulatorytreatmentafterpercutaneousmitralvalverepairusingmitracliparetrospectiveobservationalstudyon1300patients
AT schipperjanhendrik realworldanticoagulatorytreatmentafterpercutaneousmitralvalverepairusingmitracliparetrospectiveobservationalstudyon1300patients
AT baldusstephan realworldanticoagulatorytreatmentafterpercutaneousmitralvalverepairusingmitracliparetrospectiveobservationalstudyon1300patients
AT pfisterroman realworldanticoagulatorytreatmentafterpercutaneousmitralvalverepairusingmitracliparetrospectiveobservationalstudyon1300patients