Cargando…
Chlormethine Gel Versus Chlormethine Ointment for Treatment of Patients with Mycosis Fungoides: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Clinical Trial Data
BACKGROUND: Chlormethine gel was approved for treatment of mycosis fungoides, the most common cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, on the basis of results from study 201 and study 202. A post-hoc analysis of study 201 found interesting trends regarding improved efficacy of chlormethine gel vs ointment and not...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40257-022-00687-y |
_version_ | 1784759097491456000 |
---|---|
author | Querfeld, Christiane Scarisbrick, Julia J. Assaf, Chalid Kim, Youn H. Guitart, Joan Quaglino, Pietro Hodak, Emmilia |
author_facet | Querfeld, Christiane Scarisbrick, Julia J. Assaf, Chalid Kim, Youn H. Guitart, Joan Quaglino, Pietro Hodak, Emmilia |
author_sort | Querfeld, Christiane |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chlormethine gel was approved for treatment of mycosis fungoides, the most common cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, on the basis of results from study 201 and study 202. A post-hoc analysis of study 201 found interesting trends regarding improved efficacy of chlormethine gel vs ointment and noted a potential association between dermatitis and clinical response. OBJECTIVE: To expand these results by performing a post-hoc analysis of study 202. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received chlormethine gel or ointment during study 201 (12 months) and higher-concentration chlormethine gel during study 202 (7-month extension). Response was assessed using Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (CAILS). Associations between treatment frequency, response, and skin-related adverse events (AEs) were assessed using multivariate time-to-event analyses. Time-to-response and repeated measures analyses were compared between patients who only used chlormethine gel and those who switched from ointment to gel. RESULTS: No associations were seen between treatment frequency and improved skin response (CAILS) or AE occurrence within the 201/202 study populations. However, an association was observed specifically between contact dermatitis and improved CAILS response at the next visit (p < 0.0001). Patients who used chlormethine gel during both studies had a significantly (p < 0.05) shorter time to response and higher overall response rates than patients who initiated treatment with ointment. CONCLUSIONS: This post-hoc analysis shows that patients who initiated treatment using chlormethine gel had faster and higher responses compared with patients who initially used chlormethine ointment for 12 months. The development of contact dermatitis may be a potential prognostic factor for response. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS AND DATES OF REGISTRATION: Study 201: NCT00168064, September 14, 2002; Study 202: NCT00535470, September 26, 2007. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40257-022-00687-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9334402 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93344022022-07-30 Chlormethine Gel Versus Chlormethine Ointment for Treatment of Patients with Mycosis Fungoides: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Clinical Trial Data Querfeld, Christiane Scarisbrick, Julia J. Assaf, Chalid Kim, Youn H. Guitart, Joan Quaglino, Pietro Hodak, Emmilia Am J Clin Dermatol Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Chlormethine gel was approved for treatment of mycosis fungoides, the most common cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, on the basis of results from study 201 and study 202. A post-hoc analysis of study 201 found interesting trends regarding improved efficacy of chlormethine gel vs ointment and noted a potential association between dermatitis and clinical response. OBJECTIVE: To expand these results by performing a post-hoc analysis of study 202. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received chlormethine gel or ointment during study 201 (12 months) and higher-concentration chlormethine gel during study 202 (7-month extension). Response was assessed using Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (CAILS). Associations between treatment frequency, response, and skin-related adverse events (AEs) were assessed using multivariate time-to-event analyses. Time-to-response and repeated measures analyses were compared between patients who only used chlormethine gel and those who switched from ointment to gel. RESULTS: No associations were seen between treatment frequency and improved skin response (CAILS) or AE occurrence within the 201/202 study populations. However, an association was observed specifically between contact dermatitis and improved CAILS response at the next visit (p < 0.0001). Patients who used chlormethine gel during both studies had a significantly (p < 0.05) shorter time to response and higher overall response rates than patients who initiated treatment with ointment. CONCLUSIONS: This post-hoc analysis shows that patients who initiated treatment using chlormethine gel had faster and higher responses compared with patients who initially used chlormethine ointment for 12 months. The development of contact dermatitis may be a potential prognostic factor for response. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS AND DATES OF REGISTRATION: Study 201: NCT00168064, September 14, 2002; Study 202: NCT00535470, September 26, 2007. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40257-022-00687-y. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9334402/ /pubmed/35536441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40257-022-00687-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Querfeld, Christiane Scarisbrick, Julia J. Assaf, Chalid Kim, Youn H. Guitart, Joan Quaglino, Pietro Hodak, Emmilia Chlormethine Gel Versus Chlormethine Ointment for Treatment of Patients with Mycosis Fungoides: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Clinical Trial Data |
title | Chlormethine Gel Versus Chlormethine Ointment for Treatment of Patients with Mycosis Fungoides: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Clinical Trial Data |
title_full | Chlormethine Gel Versus Chlormethine Ointment for Treatment of Patients with Mycosis Fungoides: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Clinical Trial Data |
title_fullStr | Chlormethine Gel Versus Chlormethine Ointment for Treatment of Patients with Mycosis Fungoides: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Clinical Trial Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Chlormethine Gel Versus Chlormethine Ointment for Treatment of Patients with Mycosis Fungoides: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Clinical Trial Data |
title_short | Chlormethine Gel Versus Chlormethine Ointment for Treatment of Patients with Mycosis Fungoides: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Clinical Trial Data |
title_sort | chlormethine gel versus chlormethine ointment for treatment of patients with mycosis fungoides: a post-hoc analysis of clinical trial data |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40257-022-00687-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT querfeldchristiane chlormethinegelversuschlormethineointmentfortreatmentofpatientswithmycosisfungoidesaposthocanalysisofclinicaltrialdata AT scarisbrickjuliaj chlormethinegelversuschlormethineointmentfortreatmentofpatientswithmycosisfungoidesaposthocanalysisofclinicaltrialdata AT assafchalid chlormethinegelversuschlormethineointmentfortreatmentofpatientswithmycosisfungoidesaposthocanalysisofclinicaltrialdata AT kimyounh chlormethinegelversuschlormethineointmentfortreatmentofpatientswithmycosisfungoidesaposthocanalysisofclinicaltrialdata AT guitartjoan chlormethinegelversuschlormethineointmentfortreatmentofpatientswithmycosisfungoidesaposthocanalysisofclinicaltrialdata AT quaglinopietro chlormethinegelversuschlormethineointmentfortreatmentofpatientswithmycosisfungoidesaposthocanalysisofclinicaltrialdata AT hodakemmilia chlormethinegelversuschlormethineointmentfortreatmentofpatientswithmycosisfungoidesaposthocanalysisofclinicaltrialdata |