Cargando…

Dating of polyhalite: a difficult (40)Ar/(39)Ar dating tool of diagenetic to very low-grade metamorphic processes

Halite already deforms at surface temperatures. A valuable universal dating tool to constrain the timing of sedimentary, diagenetic, or deformational structures is still missing. The evaporite mineral polyhalite can be dated by the (40)Ar/(39)Ar method. On the example of the extremely deformed halit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leitner, C., Neubauer, F., Genser, J., Bernroider, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35915856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00531-022-02219-9
_version_ 1784759097967509504
author Leitner, C.
Neubauer, F.
Genser, J.
Bernroider, M.
author_facet Leitner, C.
Neubauer, F.
Genser, J.
Bernroider, M.
author_sort Leitner, C.
collection PubMed
description Halite already deforms at surface temperatures. A valuable universal dating tool to constrain the timing of sedimentary, diagenetic, or deformational structures is still missing. The evaporite mineral polyhalite can be dated by the (40)Ar/(39)Ar method. On the example of the extremely deformed halite deposits of the Eastern Alps, polyhalite was tested to date early diagenetic stages of the deposits. The sedimentological investigation of the present study indicates that some of the macrostructures of polyhalite had a syn-depositional origin during the late Permian. It is supposed that polyhalite originated during reflux of brines. All samples selected for age dating represent characteristic microfabric types of euhedral to subhedral polyhalite crystals. Intact macro- and non-recrystallized looking microstructures of polyhalite can be expected to give plateau ages. However, nearly all measurements produced overdispersed data that do not define an age. The oldest age steps thus represent only minimum ages. A closer look revealed grain boundary migration, subgrain rotation recrystallization, twinning, and fluid-supported grain size increase. These recovery processes obscured the original ages and/or reflect the origin of new polyhalite in place of the original individuals. Based on these microstructures, the age data are supposed to reflect the circulation of aqueous fluids. Just extremely careful separation of individual crystals or in situ age dating under the microscope will be successful in dating polyhalite. Nevertheless, polyhalite can potentially serve to date deformational events of halite deposits due to its easy recrystallization property. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00531-022-02219-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9334404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93344042022-07-30 Dating of polyhalite: a difficult (40)Ar/(39)Ar dating tool of diagenetic to very low-grade metamorphic processes Leitner, C. Neubauer, F. Genser, J. Bernroider, M. Int J Earth Sci Original Paper Halite already deforms at surface temperatures. A valuable universal dating tool to constrain the timing of sedimentary, diagenetic, or deformational structures is still missing. The evaporite mineral polyhalite can be dated by the (40)Ar/(39)Ar method. On the example of the extremely deformed halite deposits of the Eastern Alps, polyhalite was tested to date early diagenetic stages of the deposits. The sedimentological investigation of the present study indicates that some of the macrostructures of polyhalite had a syn-depositional origin during the late Permian. It is supposed that polyhalite originated during reflux of brines. All samples selected for age dating represent characteristic microfabric types of euhedral to subhedral polyhalite crystals. Intact macro- and non-recrystallized looking microstructures of polyhalite can be expected to give plateau ages. However, nearly all measurements produced overdispersed data that do not define an age. The oldest age steps thus represent only minimum ages. A closer look revealed grain boundary migration, subgrain rotation recrystallization, twinning, and fluid-supported grain size increase. These recovery processes obscured the original ages and/or reflect the origin of new polyhalite in place of the original individuals. Based on these microstructures, the age data are supposed to reflect the circulation of aqueous fluids. Just extremely careful separation of individual crystals or in situ age dating under the microscope will be successful in dating polyhalite. Nevertheless, polyhalite can potentially serve to date deformational events of halite deposits due to its easy recrystallization property. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00531-022-02219-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9334404/ /pubmed/35915856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00531-022-02219-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Leitner, C.
Neubauer, F.
Genser, J.
Bernroider, M.
Dating of polyhalite: a difficult (40)Ar/(39)Ar dating tool of diagenetic to very low-grade metamorphic processes
title Dating of polyhalite: a difficult (40)Ar/(39)Ar dating tool of diagenetic to very low-grade metamorphic processes
title_full Dating of polyhalite: a difficult (40)Ar/(39)Ar dating tool of diagenetic to very low-grade metamorphic processes
title_fullStr Dating of polyhalite: a difficult (40)Ar/(39)Ar dating tool of diagenetic to very low-grade metamorphic processes
title_full_unstemmed Dating of polyhalite: a difficult (40)Ar/(39)Ar dating tool of diagenetic to very low-grade metamorphic processes
title_short Dating of polyhalite: a difficult (40)Ar/(39)Ar dating tool of diagenetic to very low-grade metamorphic processes
title_sort dating of polyhalite: a difficult (40)ar/(39)ar dating tool of diagenetic to very low-grade metamorphic processes
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35915856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00531-022-02219-9
work_keys_str_mv AT leitnerc datingofpolyhaliteadifficult40ar39ardatingtoolofdiagenetictoverylowgrademetamorphicprocesses
AT neubauerf datingofpolyhaliteadifficult40ar39ardatingtoolofdiagenetictoverylowgrademetamorphicprocesses
AT genserj datingofpolyhaliteadifficult40ar39ardatingtoolofdiagenetictoverylowgrademetamorphicprocesses
AT bernroiderm datingofpolyhaliteadifficult40ar39ardatingtoolofdiagenetictoverylowgrademetamorphicprocesses