Cargando…
Cognitive bias in animal behavior science: a philosophical perspective
Emotional states of animals influence their cognitive processes as well as their behavior. Assessing emotional states is important for animal welfare science as well as for many fields of neuroscience, behavior science, and biomedicine. This can be done in different ways, e.g. through assessing anim...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35781584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01647-z |
_version_ | 1784759099972386816 |
---|---|
author | Nematipour, Behzad Bračić, Marko Krohs, Ulrich |
author_facet | Nematipour, Behzad Bračić, Marko Krohs, Ulrich |
author_sort | Nematipour, Behzad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Emotional states of animals influence their cognitive processes as well as their behavior. Assessing emotional states is important for animal welfare science as well as for many fields of neuroscience, behavior science, and biomedicine. This can be done in different ways, e.g. through assessing animals’ physiological states or interpreting their behaviors. This paper focuses on the so-called cognitive judgment bias test, which has gained special attention in the last 2 decades and has become a highly important tool for measuring emotional states in non-human animals. However, less attention has been given to the epistemology of the cognitive judgment bias test and to disentangling the relevance of different steps in the underlying cognitive mechanisms. This paper sheds some light on both the epistemology of the methods and the architecture of the underlying cognitive abilities of the tested animals. Based on this reconstruction, we propose a scheme for classifying and assessing different cognitive abilities involved in cognitive judgment bias tests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9334413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93344132022-07-30 Cognitive bias in animal behavior science: a philosophical perspective Nematipour, Behzad Bračić, Marko Krohs, Ulrich Anim Cogn Original Paper Emotional states of animals influence their cognitive processes as well as their behavior. Assessing emotional states is important for animal welfare science as well as for many fields of neuroscience, behavior science, and biomedicine. This can be done in different ways, e.g. through assessing animals’ physiological states or interpreting their behaviors. This paper focuses on the so-called cognitive judgment bias test, which has gained special attention in the last 2 decades and has become a highly important tool for measuring emotional states in non-human animals. However, less attention has been given to the epistemology of the cognitive judgment bias test and to disentangling the relevance of different steps in the underlying cognitive mechanisms. This paper sheds some light on both the epistemology of the methods and the architecture of the underlying cognitive abilities of the tested animals. Based on this reconstruction, we propose a scheme for classifying and assessing different cognitive abilities involved in cognitive judgment bias tests. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9334413/ /pubmed/35781584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01647-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Nematipour, Behzad Bračić, Marko Krohs, Ulrich Cognitive bias in animal behavior science: a philosophical perspective |
title | Cognitive bias in animal behavior science: a philosophical perspective |
title_full | Cognitive bias in animal behavior science: a philosophical perspective |
title_fullStr | Cognitive bias in animal behavior science: a philosophical perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive bias in animal behavior science: a philosophical perspective |
title_short | Cognitive bias in animal behavior science: a philosophical perspective |
title_sort | cognitive bias in animal behavior science: a philosophical perspective |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35781584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01647-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nematipourbehzad cognitivebiasinanimalbehaviorscienceaphilosophicalperspective AT bracicmarko cognitivebiasinanimalbehaviorscienceaphilosophicalperspective AT krohsulrich cognitivebiasinanimalbehaviorscienceaphilosophicalperspective |