Cargando…

Reading text works better than watching videos to improve acuity in a simulation of artificial vision

Simulated artificial vision is used in visual prosthesis design to answer questions about device usability. We previously reported a striking increase in equivalent visual acuity with daily use of a simulation of artificial vision in an active task, reading sentences, that required high levels of su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rassia, Katerina Eleonora K., Moutoussis, Konstantinos, Pezaris, John S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10719-6
_version_ 1784759108387209216
author Rassia, Katerina Eleonora K.
Moutoussis, Konstantinos
Pezaris, John S.
author_facet Rassia, Katerina Eleonora K.
Moutoussis, Konstantinos
Pezaris, John S.
author_sort Rassia, Katerina Eleonora K.
collection PubMed
description Simulated artificial vision is used in visual prosthesis design to answer questions about device usability. We previously reported a striking increase in equivalent visual acuity with daily use of a simulation of artificial vision in an active task, reading sentences, that required high levels of subject engagement, but passive activities are more likely to dominate post-implant experience. Here, we investigated the longitudinal effects of a passive task, watching videos. Eight subjects used a simulation of a thalamic visual prosthesis with 1000 phosphenes to watch 23 episodes of classic American television in daily, 25-min sessions, for a period of 1 month with interspersed reading tests that quantified reading accuracy and reading speed. For reading accuracy, we found similar dynamics to the early part of the learning process in our previous report, here leading to an improvement in visual acuity of 0.15 ± 0.05 logMAR. For reading speed, however, no change was apparent by the end of training. We found that single reading sessions drove about twice the improvement in acuity of single video sessions despite being only half as long. We conclude that while passive viewing tasks may prove useful for post-implant rehabilitation, active tasks are likely to be preferable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9334451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93344512022-07-30 Reading text works better than watching videos to improve acuity in a simulation of artificial vision Rassia, Katerina Eleonora K. Moutoussis, Konstantinos Pezaris, John S. Sci Rep Article Simulated artificial vision is used in visual prosthesis design to answer questions about device usability. We previously reported a striking increase in equivalent visual acuity with daily use of a simulation of artificial vision in an active task, reading sentences, that required high levels of subject engagement, but passive activities are more likely to dominate post-implant experience. Here, we investigated the longitudinal effects of a passive task, watching videos. Eight subjects used a simulation of a thalamic visual prosthesis with 1000 phosphenes to watch 23 episodes of classic American television in daily, 25-min sessions, for a period of 1 month with interspersed reading tests that quantified reading accuracy and reading speed. For reading accuracy, we found similar dynamics to the early part of the learning process in our previous report, here leading to an improvement in visual acuity of 0.15 ± 0.05 logMAR. For reading speed, however, no change was apparent by the end of training. We found that single reading sessions drove about twice the improvement in acuity of single video sessions despite being only half as long. We conclude that while passive viewing tasks may prove useful for post-implant rehabilitation, active tasks are likely to be preferable. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9334451/ /pubmed/35902596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10719-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Rassia, Katerina Eleonora K.
Moutoussis, Konstantinos
Pezaris, John S.
Reading text works better than watching videos to improve acuity in a simulation of artificial vision
title Reading text works better than watching videos to improve acuity in a simulation of artificial vision
title_full Reading text works better than watching videos to improve acuity in a simulation of artificial vision
title_fullStr Reading text works better than watching videos to improve acuity in a simulation of artificial vision
title_full_unstemmed Reading text works better than watching videos to improve acuity in a simulation of artificial vision
title_short Reading text works better than watching videos to improve acuity in a simulation of artificial vision
title_sort reading text works better than watching videos to improve acuity in a simulation of artificial vision
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10719-6
work_keys_str_mv AT rassiakaterinaeleonorak readingtextworksbetterthanwatchingvideostoimproveacuityinasimulationofartificialvision
AT moutoussiskonstantinos readingtextworksbetterthanwatchingvideostoimproveacuityinasimulationofartificialvision
AT pezarisjohns readingtextworksbetterthanwatchingvideostoimproveacuityinasimulationofartificialvision