Cargando…
Effects of individual and dyadic decision-making and normative reference on delay discounting decisions
The tendency to devaluate delayed rewards, a phenomenon referred to as ‘discounting behaviour’, has been studied by wide-ranging research examining individuals choosing between sooner but smaller or later but larger rewards. Despite the fact that many real-life choices are embedded in a social conte...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35900639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00422-5 |
_version_ | 1784759116643696640 |
---|---|
author | Schwenke, Diana Wehner, Peggy Scherbaum, Stefan |
author_facet | Schwenke, Diana Wehner, Peggy Scherbaum, Stefan |
author_sort | Schwenke, Diana |
collection | PubMed |
description | The tendency to devaluate delayed rewards, a phenomenon referred to as ‘discounting behaviour’, has been studied by wide-ranging research examining individuals choosing between sooner but smaller or later but larger rewards. Despite the fact that many real-life choices are embedded in a social context, the question of whether or not social collaboration can have an impact on such choices has not been addressed empirically. With this research, we aimed to fill this gap experimentally by implementing a novel choice selection procedure in order to study the interactive dynamics between two participants. This selection procedure allowed us to dissect the sequence of decision-making into its elements, starting from the very first individual preference to the solution of possible conflicting preferences in the dyad. In Experiment 1, we studied group decision-making on classical intertemporal choices to reveal the possible benefit of social collaboration on discounting and identified that the knowledge of the social situation in collective decision-making causes a reduction in discounting. In a pre-registered Experiment 2, we compared classical intertemporal choices with choices in a gamified version of a discounting paradigm in which the participants had a real-time experience trial by trial and for which a normative reference was present. We found that collective decision-making had a substantial impact on intertemporal decision-making, but was shaped by different types of choices. Classical intertemporal choices were rather susceptible to the contextual factors of decision-making, whereas in the gamified version that included a normative reference the decisions were reliably influenced by social collaboration and resulted in a lower discounting. The results in this paradigm replicate our original findings from former research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41235-022-00422-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9334506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93345062022-07-30 Effects of individual and dyadic decision-making and normative reference on delay discounting decisions Schwenke, Diana Wehner, Peggy Scherbaum, Stefan Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article The tendency to devaluate delayed rewards, a phenomenon referred to as ‘discounting behaviour’, has been studied by wide-ranging research examining individuals choosing between sooner but smaller or later but larger rewards. Despite the fact that many real-life choices are embedded in a social context, the question of whether or not social collaboration can have an impact on such choices has not been addressed empirically. With this research, we aimed to fill this gap experimentally by implementing a novel choice selection procedure in order to study the interactive dynamics between two participants. This selection procedure allowed us to dissect the sequence of decision-making into its elements, starting from the very first individual preference to the solution of possible conflicting preferences in the dyad. In Experiment 1, we studied group decision-making on classical intertemporal choices to reveal the possible benefit of social collaboration on discounting and identified that the knowledge of the social situation in collective decision-making causes a reduction in discounting. In a pre-registered Experiment 2, we compared classical intertemporal choices with choices in a gamified version of a discounting paradigm in which the participants had a real-time experience trial by trial and for which a normative reference was present. We found that collective decision-making had a substantial impact on intertemporal decision-making, but was shaped by different types of choices. Classical intertemporal choices were rather susceptible to the contextual factors of decision-making, whereas in the gamified version that included a normative reference the decisions were reliably influenced by social collaboration and resulted in a lower discounting. The results in this paradigm replicate our original findings from former research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41235-022-00422-5. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9334506/ /pubmed/35900639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00422-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Schwenke, Diana Wehner, Peggy Scherbaum, Stefan Effects of individual and dyadic decision-making and normative reference on delay discounting decisions |
title | Effects of individual and dyadic decision-making and normative reference on delay discounting decisions |
title_full | Effects of individual and dyadic decision-making and normative reference on delay discounting decisions |
title_fullStr | Effects of individual and dyadic decision-making and normative reference on delay discounting decisions |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of individual and dyadic decision-making and normative reference on delay discounting decisions |
title_short | Effects of individual and dyadic decision-making and normative reference on delay discounting decisions |
title_sort | effects of individual and dyadic decision-making and normative reference on delay discounting decisions |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35900639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00422-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwenkediana effectsofindividualanddyadicdecisionmakingandnormativereferenceondelaydiscountingdecisions AT wehnerpeggy effectsofindividualanddyadicdecisionmakingandnormativereferenceondelaydiscountingdecisions AT scherbaumstefan effectsofindividualanddyadicdecisionmakingandnormativereferenceondelaydiscountingdecisions |