Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Voriconazole Versus Amphotericin B Deoxycholate Induction Treatment for HIV-Associated Talaromycosis: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study in China

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend amphotericin B as the preferred drug for induction therapy; however, amphotericin B is not available in certain settings. Induction therapy with amphotericin B deoxycholate or voriconazole has been shown to be an effective treatment for talaromycosis. Howev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Yihong, Qin, Yuanyuan, Lu, Yanqiu, Yuan, Jing, Nie, Jingmin, Liu, Min, Tian, Qun, Lan, Ke, Zhou, Guoqiang, Qin, Yingmei, He, Kaiyin, Yu, Jianhua, Jiang, Zhongsheng, Liu, Jun, Liu, Shuiqing, Harypursat, Vijay, Chen, Yaokai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35689792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00658-0
_version_ 1784759116900597760
author Zhou, Yihong
Qin, Yuanyuan
Lu, Yanqiu
Yuan, Jing
Nie, Jingmin
Liu, Min
Tian, Qun
Lan, Ke
Zhou, Guoqiang
Qin, Yingmei
He, Kaiyin
Yu, Jianhua
Jiang, Zhongsheng
Liu, Jun
Liu, Shuiqing
Harypursat, Vijay
Chen, Yaokai
author_facet Zhou, Yihong
Qin, Yuanyuan
Lu, Yanqiu
Yuan, Jing
Nie, Jingmin
Liu, Min
Tian, Qun
Lan, Ke
Zhou, Guoqiang
Qin, Yingmei
He, Kaiyin
Yu, Jianhua
Jiang, Zhongsheng
Liu, Jun
Liu, Shuiqing
Harypursat, Vijay
Chen, Yaokai
author_sort Zhou, Yihong
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend amphotericin B as the preferred drug for induction therapy; however, amphotericin B is not available in certain settings. Induction therapy with amphotericin B deoxycholate or voriconazole has been shown to be an effective treatment for talaromycosis. However, prospective clinical trials comparing these two antifungal drugs are absent from the literature. METHODS: In this open-labeled, multicenter, prospective controlled trial, we enrolled patients at 15 hospitals in China from 2019 to 2020. Participants received induction treatment with either amphotericin B deoxycholate intravenously at a dose of 0.5 to 0.7 mg per kilogram per day or voriconazole at a dose of 6 mg/kg intravenously twice daily for the first day, followed by 4 mg/kg intravenously twice daily for 3 days, and then voriconazole was given either intravenously (4 mg/kg intravenously twice daily) or orally (200 mg twice daily) for the remaining 10 days. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality during 48 weeks after baseline. Secondary outcomes were mortality at week 2 or week 24, clinical resolution of talaromycosis, and fungal clearance at week 2. A propensity score (PS) matching analysis was performed to control confounding factors. RESULTS: We observed no difference in the risk of death at week 2, at week 24, or at week 48 in either the unmatched cohort or the matched cohort. Both in the unmatched and the matched cohorts, logistic regression analysis revealed a significantly lower odds ratio of clinical resolution (OR 0.450, 95% CI 0.291–0.696, p < 0.001; OR 0.443, 95% CI 0.261–0.752, p = 0.003) and fungal clearance (OR 0.514, 95% CI 0.333–0.793, p = 0.003; OR 0.542, 95% CI 0.318–0.923, p = 0.024) in voriconazole users compared to amphotericin B deoxycholate users over the course of 2 weeks. In the induction therapy without ART subgroup patients in the amphotericin B deoxycholate group showed a significantly higher rate of clinical resolution and fungal clearance than those in the voriconazole group (56.1% vs. 30.4%, 95% CI 13.4–36.5, p = 0.000; 63.8% vs. 40.4%, 95% CI 11.1–34.7, p = 0.000), whereas there was no significant difference in clinical resolution and fungal clearance in the induction therapy combined with ART subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Induction therapy using voriconazole had a similar efficacy, in terms of all-cause mortality rate, to induction therapy using amphotericin B deoxycholate in HIV-infected patients with talaromycosis over a 48-week observation period. Amphotericin B deoxycholate contributed to earlier fungal clearance and earlier clinical resolution of symptoms in the induction therapy without ART subgroup, whereas amphotericin B deoxycholate use did not contribute to a significant difference in clinical resolution and fungal clearance in the induction therapy combination with ART subgroup. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900021195. Registered 1 February 2019, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=35362.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9334509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93345092022-07-30 Efficacy and Safety of Voriconazole Versus Amphotericin B Deoxycholate Induction Treatment for HIV-Associated Talaromycosis: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study in China Zhou, Yihong Qin, Yuanyuan Lu, Yanqiu Yuan, Jing Nie, Jingmin Liu, Min Tian, Qun Lan, Ke Zhou, Guoqiang Qin, Yingmei He, Kaiyin Yu, Jianhua Jiang, Zhongsheng Liu, Jun Liu, Shuiqing Harypursat, Vijay Chen, Yaokai Infect Dis Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend amphotericin B as the preferred drug for induction therapy; however, amphotericin B is not available in certain settings. Induction therapy with amphotericin B deoxycholate or voriconazole has been shown to be an effective treatment for talaromycosis. However, prospective clinical trials comparing these two antifungal drugs are absent from the literature. METHODS: In this open-labeled, multicenter, prospective controlled trial, we enrolled patients at 15 hospitals in China from 2019 to 2020. Participants received induction treatment with either amphotericin B deoxycholate intravenously at a dose of 0.5 to 0.7 mg per kilogram per day or voriconazole at a dose of 6 mg/kg intravenously twice daily for the first day, followed by 4 mg/kg intravenously twice daily for 3 days, and then voriconazole was given either intravenously (4 mg/kg intravenously twice daily) or orally (200 mg twice daily) for the remaining 10 days. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality during 48 weeks after baseline. Secondary outcomes were mortality at week 2 or week 24, clinical resolution of talaromycosis, and fungal clearance at week 2. A propensity score (PS) matching analysis was performed to control confounding factors. RESULTS: We observed no difference in the risk of death at week 2, at week 24, or at week 48 in either the unmatched cohort or the matched cohort. Both in the unmatched and the matched cohorts, logistic regression analysis revealed a significantly lower odds ratio of clinical resolution (OR 0.450, 95% CI 0.291–0.696, p < 0.001; OR 0.443, 95% CI 0.261–0.752, p = 0.003) and fungal clearance (OR 0.514, 95% CI 0.333–0.793, p = 0.003; OR 0.542, 95% CI 0.318–0.923, p = 0.024) in voriconazole users compared to amphotericin B deoxycholate users over the course of 2 weeks. In the induction therapy without ART subgroup patients in the amphotericin B deoxycholate group showed a significantly higher rate of clinical resolution and fungal clearance than those in the voriconazole group (56.1% vs. 30.4%, 95% CI 13.4–36.5, p = 0.000; 63.8% vs. 40.4%, 95% CI 11.1–34.7, p = 0.000), whereas there was no significant difference in clinical resolution and fungal clearance in the induction therapy combined with ART subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Induction therapy using voriconazole had a similar efficacy, in terms of all-cause mortality rate, to induction therapy using amphotericin B deoxycholate in HIV-infected patients with talaromycosis over a 48-week observation period. Amphotericin B deoxycholate contributed to earlier fungal clearance and earlier clinical resolution of symptoms in the induction therapy without ART subgroup, whereas amphotericin B deoxycholate use did not contribute to a significant difference in clinical resolution and fungal clearance in the induction therapy combination with ART subgroup. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900021195. Registered 1 February 2019, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=35362. Springer Healthcare 2022-06-11 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9334509/ /pubmed/35689792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00658-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhou, Yihong
Qin, Yuanyuan
Lu, Yanqiu
Yuan, Jing
Nie, Jingmin
Liu, Min
Tian, Qun
Lan, Ke
Zhou, Guoqiang
Qin, Yingmei
He, Kaiyin
Yu, Jianhua
Jiang, Zhongsheng
Liu, Jun
Liu, Shuiqing
Harypursat, Vijay
Chen, Yaokai
Efficacy and Safety of Voriconazole Versus Amphotericin B Deoxycholate Induction Treatment for HIV-Associated Talaromycosis: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study in China
title Efficacy and Safety of Voriconazole Versus Amphotericin B Deoxycholate Induction Treatment for HIV-Associated Talaromycosis: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study in China
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Voriconazole Versus Amphotericin B Deoxycholate Induction Treatment for HIV-Associated Talaromycosis: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study in China
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Voriconazole Versus Amphotericin B Deoxycholate Induction Treatment for HIV-Associated Talaromycosis: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study in China
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Voriconazole Versus Amphotericin B Deoxycholate Induction Treatment for HIV-Associated Talaromycosis: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study in China
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Voriconazole Versus Amphotericin B Deoxycholate Induction Treatment for HIV-Associated Talaromycosis: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study in China
title_sort efficacy and safety of voriconazole versus amphotericin b deoxycholate induction treatment for hiv-associated talaromycosis: a prospective multicenter cohort study in china
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35689792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00658-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouyihong efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT qinyuanyuan efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT luyanqiu efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT yuanjing efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT niejingmin efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT liumin efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT tianqun efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT lanke efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT zhouguoqiang efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT qinyingmei efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT hekaiyin efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT yujianhua efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT jiangzhongsheng efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT liujun efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT liushuiqing efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT harypursatvijay efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina
AT chenyaokai efficacyandsafetyofvoriconazoleversusamphotericinbdeoxycholateinductiontreatmentforhivassociatedtalaromycosisaprospectivemulticentercohortstudyinchina