Cargando…
Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care?
This narrative review describes a new approach to navigation in a challenging landscape of clinical drug development in diabetes. Successful outcome studies in recent years have led to new indications and guidelines in type 2 diabetes, yet the number of clinical trials in diabetes is now declining....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05762-x |
_version_ | 1784759126132260864 |
---|---|
author | Eriksson, Jan W. Eliasson, Björn Bennet, Louise Sundström, Johan |
author_facet | Eriksson, Jan W. Eliasson, Björn Bennet, Louise Sundström, Johan |
author_sort | Eriksson, Jan W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This narrative review describes a new approach to navigation in a challenging landscape of clinical drug development in diabetes. Successful outcome studies in recent years have led to new indications and guidelines in type 2 diabetes, yet the number of clinical trials in diabetes is now declining. This is due to many environmental factors acting in concert, including the prioritisation of funding for other diseases, high costs of large randomised clinical trials, increase in regulatory requirements and limited entry of novel candidate drugs. There is a need for novel and cost-effective paradigms of clinical development to meet these and other challenges. The concept of registry-based randomised clinical trials (RRCTs) is an attractive option. In this review we focus on type 2 diabetes and the prevention of cardiovascular and microvascular comorbidities and mortality, using the Swedish SMARTEST trial as an example of an RRCT. We also give some examples from other disease areas. The RRCT concept is a novel, cost-effective and scientifically sound approach for conducting large-scale diabetes trials in a real-world setting. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains a slideset of the figures for download, available at 10.1007/s00125-022-05762-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9334551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93345512022-07-29 Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care? Eriksson, Jan W. Eliasson, Björn Bennet, Louise Sundström, Johan Diabetologia Review This narrative review describes a new approach to navigation in a challenging landscape of clinical drug development in diabetes. Successful outcome studies in recent years have led to new indications and guidelines in type 2 diabetes, yet the number of clinical trials in diabetes is now declining. This is due to many environmental factors acting in concert, including the prioritisation of funding for other diseases, high costs of large randomised clinical trials, increase in regulatory requirements and limited entry of novel candidate drugs. There is a need for novel and cost-effective paradigms of clinical development to meet these and other challenges. The concept of registry-based randomised clinical trials (RRCTs) is an attractive option. In this review we focus on type 2 diabetes and the prevention of cardiovascular and microvascular comorbidities and mortality, using the Swedish SMARTEST trial as an example of an RRCT. We also give some examples from other disease areas. The RRCT concept is a novel, cost-effective and scientifically sound approach for conducting large-scale diabetes trials in a real-world setting. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains a slideset of the figures for download, available at 10.1007/s00125-022-05762-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9334551/ /pubmed/35902386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05762-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Eriksson, Jan W. Eliasson, Björn Bennet, Louise Sundström, Johan Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care? |
title | Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care? |
title_full | Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care? |
title_fullStr | Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care? |
title_full_unstemmed | Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care? |
title_short | Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care? |
title_sort | registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05762-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erikssonjanw registrybasedrandomisedclinicaltrialsaremedyforevidencebaseddiabetescare AT eliassonbjorn registrybasedrandomisedclinicaltrialsaremedyforevidencebaseddiabetescare AT bennetlouise registrybasedrandomisedclinicaltrialsaremedyforevidencebaseddiabetescare AT sundstromjohan registrybasedrandomisedclinicaltrialsaremedyforevidencebaseddiabetescare |