Cargando…

Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care?

This narrative review describes a new approach to navigation in a challenging landscape of clinical drug development in diabetes. Successful outcome studies in recent years have led to new indications and guidelines in type 2 diabetes, yet the number of clinical trials in diabetes is now declining....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eriksson, Jan W., Eliasson, Björn, Bennet, Louise, Sundström, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05762-x
_version_ 1784759126132260864
author Eriksson, Jan W.
Eliasson, Björn
Bennet, Louise
Sundström, Johan
author_facet Eriksson, Jan W.
Eliasson, Björn
Bennet, Louise
Sundström, Johan
author_sort Eriksson, Jan W.
collection PubMed
description This narrative review describes a new approach to navigation in a challenging landscape of clinical drug development in diabetes. Successful outcome studies in recent years have led to new indications and guidelines in type 2 diabetes, yet the number of clinical trials in diabetes is now declining. This is due to many environmental factors acting in concert, including the prioritisation of funding for other diseases, high costs of large randomised clinical trials, increase in regulatory requirements and limited entry of novel candidate drugs. There is a need for novel and cost-effective paradigms of clinical development to meet these and other challenges. The concept of registry-based randomised clinical trials (RRCTs) is an attractive option. In this review we focus on type 2 diabetes and the prevention of cardiovascular and microvascular comorbidities and mortality, using the Swedish SMARTEST trial as an example of an RRCT. We also give some examples from other disease areas. The RRCT concept is a novel, cost-effective and scientifically sound approach for conducting large-scale diabetes trials in a real-world setting. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains a slideset of the figures for download, available at 10.1007/s00125-022-05762-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9334551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93345512022-07-29 Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care? Eriksson, Jan W. Eliasson, Björn Bennet, Louise Sundström, Johan Diabetologia Review This narrative review describes a new approach to navigation in a challenging landscape of clinical drug development in diabetes. Successful outcome studies in recent years have led to new indications and guidelines in type 2 diabetes, yet the number of clinical trials in diabetes is now declining. This is due to many environmental factors acting in concert, including the prioritisation of funding for other diseases, high costs of large randomised clinical trials, increase in regulatory requirements and limited entry of novel candidate drugs. There is a need for novel and cost-effective paradigms of clinical development to meet these and other challenges. The concept of registry-based randomised clinical trials (RRCTs) is an attractive option. In this review we focus on type 2 diabetes and the prevention of cardiovascular and microvascular comorbidities and mortality, using the Swedish SMARTEST trial as an example of an RRCT. We also give some examples from other disease areas. The RRCT concept is a novel, cost-effective and scientifically sound approach for conducting large-scale diabetes trials in a real-world setting. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains a slideset of the figures for download, available at 10.1007/s00125-022-05762-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9334551/ /pubmed/35902386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05762-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Eriksson, Jan W.
Eliasson, Björn
Bennet, Louise
Sundström, Johan
Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care?
title Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care?
title_full Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care?
title_fullStr Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care?
title_full_unstemmed Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care?
title_short Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care?
title_sort registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05762-x
work_keys_str_mv AT erikssonjanw registrybasedrandomisedclinicaltrialsaremedyforevidencebaseddiabetescare
AT eliassonbjorn registrybasedrandomisedclinicaltrialsaremedyforevidencebaseddiabetescare
AT bennetlouise registrybasedrandomisedclinicaltrialsaremedyforevidencebaseddiabetescare
AT sundstromjohan registrybasedrandomisedclinicaltrialsaremedyforevidencebaseddiabetescare