Cargando…
Administration of probiotic lactic acid bacteria to modulate fecal microbiome in feedlot cattle
Modulation of animal gut microbiota is a prominent function of probiotics to improve the health and performance of livestock. In this study, a large-scale survey to evaluate the effect of lactic acid bacteria probiotics on shaping the fecal bacterial community structure of feedlot cattle during thre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16786-z |
_version_ | 1784759143867875328 |
---|---|
author | Mansilla, Flavia Ivana Ficoseco, Cecilia Aristimuño Miranda, María Hortencia Puglisi, Edoardo Nader-Macías, María Elena Fatima Vignolo, Graciela Margarita Fontana, Cecilia Alejandra |
author_facet | Mansilla, Flavia Ivana Ficoseco, Cecilia Aristimuño Miranda, María Hortencia Puglisi, Edoardo Nader-Macías, María Elena Fatima Vignolo, Graciela Margarita Fontana, Cecilia Alejandra |
author_sort | Mansilla, Flavia Ivana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Modulation of animal gut microbiota is a prominent function of probiotics to improve the health and performance of livestock. In this study, a large-scale survey to evaluate the effect of lactic acid bacteria probiotics on shaping the fecal bacterial community structure of feedlot cattle during three experimental periods of the fattening cycle (163 days) was performed. A commercial feedlot located in northwestern Argentina was enrolled with cattle fed mixed rations (forage and increasing grain diet) and a convenience-experimental design was conducted. A pen (n = 21 animals) was assigned to each experimental group that received probiotics during three different periods. Groups of n = 7 animals were sampled at 40, 104 and 163 days and these samples were then pooled to one, thus giving a total of 34 samples that were subjected to high-throughput sequencing. The microbial diversity of fecal samples was significantly affected (p < 0.05) by the administration period compared with probiotic group supplementation. Even though, the three experimental periods of probiotic administration induced changes in the relative abundance of the most representative bacterial communities, the fecal microbiome of samples was dominated by the Firmicutes (72–98%) and Actinobacteria (0.8–27%) phyla, while a lower abundance of Bacteroidetes (0.08–4.2%) was present. Probiotics were able to modulate the fecal microbiota with a convergence of Clostridiaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae and Bifidobacteriaceae associated with health and growth benefits as core microbiome members. Metabolic functional prediction comparing three experimental administration periods (40, 104 and 163 days) showed an enrichment of metabolic pathways related to complex plant-derived polysaccharide digestion as well as amino acids and derivatives during the first 40 days of probiotic supplementation. Genomic-based knowledge on the benefits of autochthonous probiotics on cattle gastrointestinal tract (GIT) microbiota composition and functions will contribute to their selection as antibiotic alternatives for commercial feedlot. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9334624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93346242022-07-30 Administration of probiotic lactic acid bacteria to modulate fecal microbiome in feedlot cattle Mansilla, Flavia Ivana Ficoseco, Cecilia Aristimuño Miranda, María Hortencia Puglisi, Edoardo Nader-Macías, María Elena Fatima Vignolo, Graciela Margarita Fontana, Cecilia Alejandra Sci Rep Article Modulation of animal gut microbiota is a prominent function of probiotics to improve the health and performance of livestock. In this study, a large-scale survey to evaluate the effect of lactic acid bacteria probiotics on shaping the fecal bacterial community structure of feedlot cattle during three experimental periods of the fattening cycle (163 days) was performed. A commercial feedlot located in northwestern Argentina was enrolled with cattle fed mixed rations (forage and increasing grain diet) and a convenience-experimental design was conducted. A pen (n = 21 animals) was assigned to each experimental group that received probiotics during three different periods. Groups of n = 7 animals were sampled at 40, 104 and 163 days and these samples were then pooled to one, thus giving a total of 34 samples that were subjected to high-throughput sequencing. The microbial diversity of fecal samples was significantly affected (p < 0.05) by the administration period compared with probiotic group supplementation. Even though, the three experimental periods of probiotic administration induced changes in the relative abundance of the most representative bacterial communities, the fecal microbiome of samples was dominated by the Firmicutes (72–98%) and Actinobacteria (0.8–27%) phyla, while a lower abundance of Bacteroidetes (0.08–4.2%) was present. Probiotics were able to modulate the fecal microbiota with a convergence of Clostridiaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae and Bifidobacteriaceae associated with health and growth benefits as core microbiome members. Metabolic functional prediction comparing three experimental administration periods (40, 104 and 163 days) showed an enrichment of metabolic pathways related to complex plant-derived polysaccharide digestion as well as amino acids and derivatives during the first 40 days of probiotic supplementation. Genomic-based knowledge on the benefits of autochthonous probiotics on cattle gastrointestinal tract (GIT) microbiota composition and functions will contribute to their selection as antibiotic alternatives for commercial feedlot. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9334624/ /pubmed/35902668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16786-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Mansilla, Flavia Ivana Ficoseco, Cecilia Aristimuño Miranda, María Hortencia Puglisi, Edoardo Nader-Macías, María Elena Fatima Vignolo, Graciela Margarita Fontana, Cecilia Alejandra Administration of probiotic lactic acid bacteria to modulate fecal microbiome in feedlot cattle |
title | Administration of probiotic lactic acid bacteria to modulate fecal microbiome in feedlot cattle |
title_full | Administration of probiotic lactic acid bacteria to modulate fecal microbiome in feedlot cattle |
title_fullStr | Administration of probiotic lactic acid bacteria to modulate fecal microbiome in feedlot cattle |
title_full_unstemmed | Administration of probiotic lactic acid bacteria to modulate fecal microbiome in feedlot cattle |
title_short | Administration of probiotic lactic acid bacteria to modulate fecal microbiome in feedlot cattle |
title_sort | administration of probiotic lactic acid bacteria to modulate fecal microbiome in feedlot cattle |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16786-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mansillaflaviaivana administrationofprobioticlacticacidbacteriatomodulatefecalmicrobiomeinfeedlotcattle AT ficosecoceciliaaristimuno administrationofprobioticlacticacidbacteriatomodulatefecalmicrobiomeinfeedlotcattle AT mirandamariahortencia administrationofprobioticlacticacidbacteriatomodulatefecalmicrobiomeinfeedlotcattle AT puglisiedoardo administrationofprobioticlacticacidbacteriatomodulatefecalmicrobiomeinfeedlotcattle AT nadermaciasmariaelenafatima administrationofprobioticlacticacidbacteriatomodulatefecalmicrobiomeinfeedlotcattle AT vignologracielamargarita administrationofprobioticlacticacidbacteriatomodulatefecalmicrobiomeinfeedlotcattle AT fontanaceciliaalejandra administrationofprobioticlacticacidbacteriatomodulatefecalmicrobiomeinfeedlotcattle |