Cargando…

Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively synthesize and quantitatively evaluate the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on dyspnea, lung functions, fatigue, exercise capacity, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with COVID-19. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Ishtiaq, Mustafaoglu, Rustem, Yeldan, Ipek, Yasaci, Zeynal, Erhan, Belgin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35908659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.007
_version_ 1784759203844325376
author Ahmed, Ishtiaq
Mustafaoglu, Rustem
Yeldan, Ipek
Yasaci, Zeynal
Erhan, Belgin
author_facet Ahmed, Ishtiaq
Mustafaoglu, Rustem
Yeldan, Ipek
Yasaci, Zeynal
Erhan, Belgin
author_sort Ahmed, Ishtiaq
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively synthesize and quantitatively evaluate the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on dyspnea, lung functions, fatigue, exercise capacity, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with COVID-19. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2020 to April 2022. DATA SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PR on dyspnea, lung functions, fatigue, exercise capacity, and QoL in patients with COVID-19. DATA EXTRACTION: The mean difference (MD) and a 95% CI were estimated for all the outcome measures using random effect models. The following data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers: (1) first author; (2) publication year; (3) nationality; (4) number of patients included (5) comorbidities; (6) ventilatory support; (7) length of inpatient stay; (8) type of PR; (9) outcome measures; and (10) main findings. The risk of bias was evaluated using the cochrane risk of bias tool. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 8 RCTs involving 449 participants were included in the review. PR was found to be significantly effective in improving dyspnea (5 studies, SMD -2.11 [95% CI, -2.96 to -1.27; P<.001]) and exercise capacity (MD 65.85 m [95% CI, 42.86 to 88.83; P<.001]) in patients with both acute and chronic COVID-19 with mild to severe symptoms, whereas fatigue (MD -2.42 [95% CI, -2.72 to -2.11, P<.05]) and lung functions (MD 0.26 L [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.48, P<.05]) were significantly improved in acute COVID-19 patients with mild symptoms. The effect of PR on QoL was inconsistent across studies. PR was found to be safe and feasible for patients with COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Evidence from studies indicates that PR program is superior to no intervention in improving dyspnea, exercise capacity, lung functions, and fatigue in patients with COVID-19. PR appears to be safe and beneficial for both acute and chronic COVID-19 patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9334878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93348782022-07-29 Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Ahmed, Ishtiaq Mustafaoglu, Rustem Yeldan, Ipek Yasaci, Zeynal Erhan, Belgin Arch Phys Med Rehabil Review Article (Meta-Analysis) OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively synthesize and quantitatively evaluate the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on dyspnea, lung functions, fatigue, exercise capacity, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with COVID-19. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2020 to April 2022. DATA SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PR on dyspnea, lung functions, fatigue, exercise capacity, and QoL in patients with COVID-19. DATA EXTRACTION: The mean difference (MD) and a 95% CI were estimated for all the outcome measures using random effect models. The following data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers: (1) first author; (2) publication year; (3) nationality; (4) number of patients included (5) comorbidities; (6) ventilatory support; (7) length of inpatient stay; (8) type of PR; (9) outcome measures; and (10) main findings. The risk of bias was evaluated using the cochrane risk of bias tool. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 8 RCTs involving 449 participants were included in the review. PR was found to be significantly effective in improving dyspnea (5 studies, SMD -2.11 [95% CI, -2.96 to -1.27; P<.001]) and exercise capacity (MD 65.85 m [95% CI, 42.86 to 88.83; P<.001]) in patients with both acute and chronic COVID-19 with mild to severe symptoms, whereas fatigue (MD -2.42 [95% CI, -2.72 to -2.11, P<.05]) and lung functions (MD 0.26 L [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.48, P<.05]) were significantly improved in acute COVID-19 patients with mild symptoms. The effect of PR on QoL was inconsistent across studies. PR was found to be safe and feasible for patients with COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Evidence from studies indicates that PR program is superior to no intervention in improving dyspnea, exercise capacity, lung functions, and fatigue in patients with COVID-19. PR appears to be safe and beneficial for both acute and chronic COVID-19 patients. by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2022-10 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9334878/ /pubmed/35908659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.007 Text en © 2022 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review Article (Meta-Analysis)
Ahmed, Ishtiaq
Mustafaoglu, Rustem
Yeldan, Ipek
Yasaci, Zeynal
Erhan, Belgin
Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort effect of pulmonary rehabilitation approaches on dyspnea, exercise capacity, fatigue, lung functions, and quality of life in patients with covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article (Meta-Analysis)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9334878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35908659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.007
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedishtiaq effectofpulmonaryrehabilitationapproachesondyspneaexercisecapacityfatiguelungfunctionsandqualityoflifeinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mustafaoglurustem effectofpulmonaryrehabilitationapproachesondyspneaexercisecapacityfatiguelungfunctionsandqualityoflifeinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yeldanipek effectofpulmonaryrehabilitationapproachesondyspneaexercisecapacityfatiguelungfunctionsandqualityoflifeinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yasacizeynal effectofpulmonaryrehabilitationapproachesondyspneaexercisecapacityfatiguelungfunctionsandqualityoflifeinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT erhanbelgin effectofpulmonaryrehabilitationapproachesondyspneaexercisecapacityfatiguelungfunctionsandqualityoflifeinpatientswithcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis