Cargando…

The “New Synthesis”

When Mendel’s work was rediscovered in 1900, and extended to establish classical genetics, it was initially seen in opposition to Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection on continuous variation, as represented by the biometric research program that was the foundation of quantitative geneti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Barton, Nicholas H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122147119
_version_ 1784759317884305408
author Barton, Nicholas H.
author_facet Barton, Nicholas H.
author_sort Barton, Nicholas H.
collection PubMed
description When Mendel’s work was rediscovered in 1900, and extended to establish classical genetics, it was initially seen in opposition to Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection on continuous variation, as represented by the biometric research program that was the foundation of quantitative genetics. As Fisher, Haldane, and Wright established a century ago, Mendelian inheritance is exactly what is needed for natural selection to work efficiently. Yet, the synthesis remains unfinished. We do not understand why sexual reproduction and a fair meiosis predominate in eukaryotes, or how far these are responsible for their diversity and complexity. Moreover, although quantitative geneticists have long known that adaptive variation is highly polygenic, and that this is essential for efficient selection, this is only now becoming appreciated by molecular biologists—and we still do not have a good framework for understanding polygenic variation or diffuse function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9335343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93353432022-07-30 The “New Synthesis” Barton, Nicholas H. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Perspective When Mendel’s work was rediscovered in 1900, and extended to establish classical genetics, it was initially seen in opposition to Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection on continuous variation, as represented by the biometric research program that was the foundation of quantitative genetics. As Fisher, Haldane, and Wright established a century ago, Mendelian inheritance is exactly what is needed for natural selection to work efficiently. Yet, the synthesis remains unfinished. We do not understand why sexual reproduction and a fair meiosis predominate in eukaryotes, or how far these are responsible for their diversity and complexity. Moreover, although quantitative geneticists have long known that adaptive variation is highly polygenic, and that this is essential for efficient selection, this is only now becoming appreciated by molecular biologists—and we still do not have a good framework for understanding polygenic variation or diffuse function. National Academy of Sciences 2022-07-18 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9335343/ /pubmed/35858408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122147119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Perspective
Barton, Nicholas H.
The “New Synthesis”
title The “New Synthesis”
title_full The “New Synthesis”
title_fullStr The “New Synthesis”
title_full_unstemmed The “New Synthesis”
title_short The “New Synthesis”
title_sort “new synthesis”
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122147119
work_keys_str_mv AT bartonnicholash thenewsynthesis
AT bartonnicholash newsynthesis