Cargando…

Quality of Sputum Specimen Samples Submitted for Culture and Drug Susceptibility Testing at the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory-Uganda, July-October 2013

SETTING: The Uganda National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory (NTRL) in Kampala. OBJECTIVE: The proportion of poor quality specimens received for drug susceptibility testing (DST) at the NTRL and factors contributing to poor specimen quality were assessed. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conduc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bulage, Lilian, Imoko, Joseph, Kirenga, Bruce J., Lo, Terry, Byabajungu, Henry, Musisi, Keneth, Joloba, Moses, Bloss, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35911866
_version_ 1784759318947561472
author Bulage, Lilian
Imoko, Joseph
Kirenga, Bruce J.
Lo, Terry
Byabajungu, Henry
Musisi, Keneth
Joloba, Moses
Bloss, Emily
author_facet Bulage, Lilian
Imoko, Joseph
Kirenga, Bruce J.
Lo, Terry
Byabajungu, Henry
Musisi, Keneth
Joloba, Moses
Bloss, Emily
author_sort Bulage, Lilian
collection PubMed
description SETTING: The Uganda National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory (NTRL) in Kampala. OBJECTIVE: The proportion of poor quality specimens received for drug susceptibility testing (DST) at the NTRL and factors contributing to poor specimen quality were assessed. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted of sputum samples received at the NTRL from patients at high risk for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) during July-October 2013. Demographic, clinical, and bacteriological data were abstracted from laboratory records. A poor quality sample failed to meet any one of four criteria: ≥3 milliliter (ml) volume, delivered within 72 hours, triple packaged, and non-salivary appearance. RESULTS: Overall, 365 (64%) of 556 samples were of poor quality; 89 (16%) were not triple packaged, 44 (8%) were <3 mls, 164 (30%) were not delivered on time, and 215 (39%) were salivary in appearance. Poor quality specimens were more likely to be collected during the eighth month of TB treatment (OR = 2.5, CI = 1.2 – 5.1), from the East or Northeast zones (OR = 2.2, CI = 1.1 – 4.8), and from patients who previously defaulted from treatment (OR = 1.9, CI = 1.1 – 3.2). CONCLUSION: The majority of sputum samples had poor quality. Additional efforts are needed to improve quality of samples collected at the end of treatment, from East and Northeast zones, and from patients who had previously defaulted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9335348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93353482022-07-29 Quality of Sputum Specimen Samples Submitted for Culture and Drug Susceptibility Testing at the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory-Uganda, July-October 2013 Bulage, Lilian Imoko, Joseph Kirenga, Bruce J. Lo, Terry Byabajungu, Henry Musisi, Keneth Joloba, Moses Bloss, Emily J Tuberc Res Article SETTING: The Uganda National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory (NTRL) in Kampala. OBJECTIVE: The proportion of poor quality specimens received for drug susceptibility testing (DST) at the NTRL and factors contributing to poor specimen quality were assessed. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted of sputum samples received at the NTRL from patients at high risk for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) during July-October 2013. Demographic, clinical, and bacteriological data were abstracted from laboratory records. A poor quality sample failed to meet any one of four criteria: ≥3 milliliter (ml) volume, delivered within 72 hours, triple packaged, and non-salivary appearance. RESULTS: Overall, 365 (64%) of 556 samples were of poor quality; 89 (16%) were not triple packaged, 44 (8%) were <3 mls, 164 (30%) were not delivered on time, and 215 (39%) were salivary in appearance. Poor quality specimens were more likely to be collected during the eighth month of TB treatment (OR = 2.5, CI = 1.2 – 5.1), from the East or Northeast zones (OR = 2.2, CI = 1.1 – 4.8), and from patients who previously defaulted from treatment (OR = 1.9, CI = 1.1 – 3.2). CONCLUSION: The majority of sputum samples had poor quality. Additional efforts are needed to improve quality of samples collected at the end of treatment, from East and Northeast zones, and from patients who had previously defaulted. 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9335348/ /pubmed/35911866 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Article
Bulage, Lilian
Imoko, Joseph
Kirenga, Bruce J.
Lo, Terry
Byabajungu, Henry
Musisi, Keneth
Joloba, Moses
Bloss, Emily
Quality of Sputum Specimen Samples Submitted for Culture and Drug Susceptibility Testing at the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory-Uganda, July-October 2013
title Quality of Sputum Specimen Samples Submitted for Culture and Drug Susceptibility Testing at the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory-Uganda, July-October 2013
title_full Quality of Sputum Specimen Samples Submitted for Culture and Drug Susceptibility Testing at the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory-Uganda, July-October 2013
title_fullStr Quality of Sputum Specimen Samples Submitted for Culture and Drug Susceptibility Testing at the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory-Uganda, July-October 2013
title_full_unstemmed Quality of Sputum Specimen Samples Submitted for Culture and Drug Susceptibility Testing at the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory-Uganda, July-October 2013
title_short Quality of Sputum Specimen Samples Submitted for Culture and Drug Susceptibility Testing at the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory-Uganda, July-October 2013
title_sort quality of sputum specimen samples submitted for culture and drug susceptibility testing at the national tuberculosis reference laboratory-uganda, july-october 2013
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35911866
work_keys_str_mv AT bulagelilian qualityofsputumspecimensamplessubmittedforcultureanddrugsusceptibilitytestingatthenationaltuberculosisreferencelaboratoryugandajulyoctober2013
AT imokojoseph qualityofsputumspecimensamplessubmittedforcultureanddrugsusceptibilitytestingatthenationaltuberculosisreferencelaboratoryugandajulyoctober2013
AT kirengabrucej qualityofsputumspecimensamplessubmittedforcultureanddrugsusceptibilitytestingatthenationaltuberculosisreferencelaboratoryugandajulyoctober2013
AT loterry qualityofsputumspecimensamplessubmittedforcultureanddrugsusceptibilitytestingatthenationaltuberculosisreferencelaboratoryugandajulyoctober2013
AT byabajunguhenry qualityofsputumspecimensamplessubmittedforcultureanddrugsusceptibilitytestingatthenationaltuberculosisreferencelaboratoryugandajulyoctober2013
AT musisikeneth qualityofsputumspecimensamplessubmittedforcultureanddrugsusceptibilitytestingatthenationaltuberculosisreferencelaboratoryugandajulyoctober2013
AT jolobamoses qualityofsputumspecimensamplessubmittedforcultureanddrugsusceptibilitytestingatthenationaltuberculosisreferencelaboratoryugandajulyoctober2013
AT blossemily qualityofsputumspecimensamplessubmittedforcultureanddrugsusceptibilitytestingatthenationaltuberculosisreferencelaboratoryugandajulyoctober2013