Cargando…
Quantitative Comparison of the Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy
[Image: see text] Functional colloidal nanoparticles capable of converting between various energy types are finding an increasing number of applications. One of the relevant examples concerns light-to-heat-converting colloidal nanoparticles that may be useful for localized photothermal therapy of ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35848997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c08013 |
_version_ | 1784759332519280640 |
---|---|
author | Paściak, Agnieszka Marin, Riccardo Abiven, Lise Pilch-Wróbel, Aleksandra Misiak, Małgorzata Xu, Wujun Prorok, Katarzyna Bezkrovnyi, Oleksii Marciniak, Łukasz Chanéac, Corinne Gazeau, Florence Bazzi, Rana Roux, Stéphane Viana, Bruno Lehto, Vesa-Pekka Jaque, Daniel Bednarkiewicz, Artur |
author_facet | Paściak, Agnieszka Marin, Riccardo Abiven, Lise Pilch-Wróbel, Aleksandra Misiak, Małgorzata Xu, Wujun Prorok, Katarzyna Bezkrovnyi, Oleksii Marciniak, Łukasz Chanéac, Corinne Gazeau, Florence Bazzi, Rana Roux, Stéphane Viana, Bruno Lehto, Vesa-Pekka Jaque, Daniel Bednarkiewicz, Artur |
author_sort | Paściak, Agnieszka |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Functional colloidal nanoparticles capable of converting between various energy types are finding an increasing number of applications. One of the relevant examples concerns light-to-heat-converting colloidal nanoparticles that may be useful for localized photothermal therapy of cancers. Unfortunately, quantitative comparison and ranking of nanoheaters are not straightforward as materials of different compositions and structures have different photophysical and chemical properties and may interact differently with the biological environment. In terms of photophysical properties, the most relevant information to rank these nanoheaters is the light-to-heat conversion efficiency, which, along with information on the absorption capacity of the material, can be used to directly compare materials. In this work, we evaluate the light-to-heat conversion properties of 17 different nanoheaters belonging to different groups (plasmonic, semiconductor, lanthanide-doped nanocrystals, carbon nanocrystals, and metal oxides). We conclude that the light-to-heat conversion efficiency alone is not meaningful enough as many materials have similar conversion efficiencies—in the range of 80–99%—while they significantly differ in their extinction coefficient. We therefore constructed their qualitative ranking based on the external conversion efficiency, which takes into account the conventionally defined light-to-heat conversion efficiency and its absorption capacity. This ranking demonstrated the differences between the samples more meaningfully. Among the studied systems, the top-ranking materials were black porous silicon and CuS nanocrystals. These results allow us to select the most favorable materials for photo-based theranostics and set a new standard in the characterization of nanoheaters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9335407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93354072022-07-30 Quantitative Comparison of the Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy Paściak, Agnieszka Marin, Riccardo Abiven, Lise Pilch-Wróbel, Aleksandra Misiak, Małgorzata Xu, Wujun Prorok, Katarzyna Bezkrovnyi, Oleksii Marciniak, Łukasz Chanéac, Corinne Gazeau, Florence Bazzi, Rana Roux, Stéphane Viana, Bruno Lehto, Vesa-Pekka Jaque, Daniel Bednarkiewicz, Artur ACS Appl Mater Interfaces [Image: see text] Functional colloidal nanoparticles capable of converting between various energy types are finding an increasing number of applications. One of the relevant examples concerns light-to-heat-converting colloidal nanoparticles that may be useful for localized photothermal therapy of cancers. Unfortunately, quantitative comparison and ranking of nanoheaters are not straightforward as materials of different compositions and structures have different photophysical and chemical properties and may interact differently with the biological environment. In terms of photophysical properties, the most relevant information to rank these nanoheaters is the light-to-heat conversion efficiency, which, along with information on the absorption capacity of the material, can be used to directly compare materials. In this work, we evaluate the light-to-heat conversion properties of 17 different nanoheaters belonging to different groups (plasmonic, semiconductor, lanthanide-doped nanocrystals, carbon nanocrystals, and metal oxides). We conclude that the light-to-heat conversion efficiency alone is not meaningful enough as many materials have similar conversion efficiencies—in the range of 80–99%—while they significantly differ in their extinction coefficient. We therefore constructed their qualitative ranking based on the external conversion efficiency, which takes into account the conventionally defined light-to-heat conversion efficiency and its absorption capacity. This ranking demonstrated the differences between the samples more meaningfully. Among the studied systems, the top-ranking materials were black porous silicon and CuS nanocrystals. These results allow us to select the most favorable materials for photo-based theranostics and set a new standard in the characterization of nanoheaters. American Chemical Society 2022-07-18 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9335407/ /pubmed/35848997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c08013 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Paściak, Agnieszka Marin, Riccardo Abiven, Lise Pilch-Wróbel, Aleksandra Misiak, Małgorzata Xu, Wujun Prorok, Katarzyna Bezkrovnyi, Oleksii Marciniak, Łukasz Chanéac, Corinne Gazeau, Florence Bazzi, Rana Roux, Stéphane Viana, Bruno Lehto, Vesa-Pekka Jaque, Daniel Bednarkiewicz, Artur Quantitative Comparison of the Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy |
title | Quantitative Comparison
of the Light-to-Heat Conversion
Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy |
title_full | Quantitative Comparison
of the Light-to-Heat Conversion
Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy |
title_fullStr | Quantitative Comparison
of the Light-to-Heat Conversion
Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Comparison
of the Light-to-Heat Conversion
Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy |
title_short | Quantitative Comparison
of the Light-to-Heat Conversion
Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy |
title_sort | quantitative comparison
of the light-to-heat conversion
efficiency in nanomaterials suitable for photothermal therapy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35848997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c08013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pasciakagnieszka quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT marinriccardo quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT abivenlise quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT pilchwrobelaleksandra quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT misiakmałgorzata quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT xuwujun quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT prorokkatarzyna quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT bezkrovnyioleksii quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT marciniakłukasz quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT chaneaccorinne quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT gazeauflorence quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT bazzirana quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT rouxstephane quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT vianabruno quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT lehtovesapekka quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT jaquedaniel quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy AT bednarkiewiczartur quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy |