Cargando…

Quantitative Comparison of the Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy

[Image: see text] Functional colloidal nanoparticles capable of converting between various energy types are finding an increasing number of applications. One of the relevant examples concerns light-to-heat-converting colloidal nanoparticles that may be useful for localized photothermal therapy of ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paściak, Agnieszka, Marin, Riccardo, Abiven, Lise, Pilch-Wróbel, Aleksandra, Misiak, Małgorzata, Xu, Wujun, Prorok, Katarzyna, Bezkrovnyi, Oleksii, Marciniak, Łukasz, Chanéac, Corinne, Gazeau, Florence, Bazzi, Rana, Roux, Stéphane, Viana, Bruno, Lehto, Vesa-Pekka, Jaque, Daniel, Bednarkiewicz, Artur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35848997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c08013
_version_ 1784759332519280640
author Paściak, Agnieszka
Marin, Riccardo
Abiven, Lise
Pilch-Wróbel, Aleksandra
Misiak, Małgorzata
Xu, Wujun
Prorok, Katarzyna
Bezkrovnyi, Oleksii
Marciniak, Łukasz
Chanéac, Corinne
Gazeau, Florence
Bazzi, Rana
Roux, Stéphane
Viana, Bruno
Lehto, Vesa-Pekka
Jaque, Daniel
Bednarkiewicz, Artur
author_facet Paściak, Agnieszka
Marin, Riccardo
Abiven, Lise
Pilch-Wróbel, Aleksandra
Misiak, Małgorzata
Xu, Wujun
Prorok, Katarzyna
Bezkrovnyi, Oleksii
Marciniak, Łukasz
Chanéac, Corinne
Gazeau, Florence
Bazzi, Rana
Roux, Stéphane
Viana, Bruno
Lehto, Vesa-Pekka
Jaque, Daniel
Bednarkiewicz, Artur
author_sort Paściak, Agnieszka
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Functional colloidal nanoparticles capable of converting between various energy types are finding an increasing number of applications. One of the relevant examples concerns light-to-heat-converting colloidal nanoparticles that may be useful for localized photothermal therapy of cancers. Unfortunately, quantitative comparison and ranking of nanoheaters are not straightforward as materials of different compositions and structures have different photophysical and chemical properties and may interact differently with the biological environment. In terms of photophysical properties, the most relevant information to rank these nanoheaters is the light-to-heat conversion efficiency, which, along with information on the absorption capacity of the material, can be used to directly compare materials. In this work, we evaluate the light-to-heat conversion properties of 17 different nanoheaters belonging to different groups (plasmonic, semiconductor, lanthanide-doped nanocrystals, carbon nanocrystals, and metal oxides). We conclude that the light-to-heat conversion efficiency alone is not meaningful enough as many materials have similar conversion efficiencies—in the range of 80–99%—while they significantly differ in their extinction coefficient. We therefore constructed their qualitative ranking based on the external conversion efficiency, which takes into account the conventionally defined light-to-heat conversion efficiency and its absorption capacity. This ranking demonstrated the differences between the samples more meaningfully. Among the studied systems, the top-ranking materials were black porous silicon and CuS nanocrystals. These results allow us to select the most favorable materials for photo-based theranostics and set a new standard in the characterization of nanoheaters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9335407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93354072022-07-30 Quantitative Comparison of the Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy Paściak, Agnieszka Marin, Riccardo Abiven, Lise Pilch-Wróbel, Aleksandra Misiak, Małgorzata Xu, Wujun Prorok, Katarzyna Bezkrovnyi, Oleksii Marciniak, Łukasz Chanéac, Corinne Gazeau, Florence Bazzi, Rana Roux, Stéphane Viana, Bruno Lehto, Vesa-Pekka Jaque, Daniel Bednarkiewicz, Artur ACS Appl Mater Interfaces [Image: see text] Functional colloidal nanoparticles capable of converting between various energy types are finding an increasing number of applications. One of the relevant examples concerns light-to-heat-converting colloidal nanoparticles that may be useful for localized photothermal therapy of cancers. Unfortunately, quantitative comparison and ranking of nanoheaters are not straightforward as materials of different compositions and structures have different photophysical and chemical properties and may interact differently with the biological environment. In terms of photophysical properties, the most relevant information to rank these nanoheaters is the light-to-heat conversion efficiency, which, along with information on the absorption capacity of the material, can be used to directly compare materials. In this work, we evaluate the light-to-heat conversion properties of 17 different nanoheaters belonging to different groups (plasmonic, semiconductor, lanthanide-doped nanocrystals, carbon nanocrystals, and metal oxides). We conclude that the light-to-heat conversion efficiency alone is not meaningful enough as many materials have similar conversion efficiencies—in the range of 80–99%—while they significantly differ in their extinction coefficient. We therefore constructed their qualitative ranking based on the external conversion efficiency, which takes into account the conventionally defined light-to-heat conversion efficiency and its absorption capacity. This ranking demonstrated the differences between the samples more meaningfully. Among the studied systems, the top-ranking materials were black porous silicon and CuS nanocrystals. These results allow us to select the most favorable materials for photo-based theranostics and set a new standard in the characterization of nanoheaters. American Chemical Society 2022-07-18 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9335407/ /pubmed/35848997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c08013 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Paściak, Agnieszka
Marin, Riccardo
Abiven, Lise
Pilch-Wróbel, Aleksandra
Misiak, Małgorzata
Xu, Wujun
Prorok, Katarzyna
Bezkrovnyi, Oleksii
Marciniak, Łukasz
Chanéac, Corinne
Gazeau, Florence
Bazzi, Rana
Roux, Stéphane
Viana, Bruno
Lehto, Vesa-Pekka
Jaque, Daniel
Bednarkiewicz, Artur
Quantitative Comparison of the Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy
title Quantitative Comparison of the Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy
title_full Quantitative Comparison of the Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy
title_fullStr Quantitative Comparison of the Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Comparison of the Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy
title_short Quantitative Comparison of the Light-to-Heat Conversion Efficiency in Nanomaterials Suitable for Photothermal Therapy
title_sort quantitative comparison of the light-to-heat conversion efficiency in nanomaterials suitable for photothermal therapy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35848997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c08013
work_keys_str_mv AT pasciakagnieszka quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT marinriccardo quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT abivenlise quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT pilchwrobelaleksandra quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT misiakmałgorzata quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT xuwujun quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT prorokkatarzyna quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT bezkrovnyioleksii quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT marciniakłukasz quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT chaneaccorinne quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT gazeauflorence quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT bazzirana quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT rouxstephane quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT vianabruno quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT lehtovesapekka quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT jaquedaniel quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy
AT bednarkiewiczartur quantitativecomparisonofthelighttoheatconversionefficiencyinnanomaterialssuitableforphotothermaltherapy