Cargando…
Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research
BACKGROUND: Interventions are often adapted; some adaptations may provoke more favorable outcomes, whereas some may not. A better understanding of the adaptations and their intended goals may elucidate which adaptations produce better outcomes. Improved methods are needed to better capture and chara...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01218-3 |
_version_ | 1784759444000735232 |
---|---|
author | Holtrop, Jodi Summers Gurfinkel, Dennis Nederveld, Andrea Phimphasone-Brady, Phoutdavone Hosokawa, Patrick Rubinson, Claude Waxmonsky, Jeanette A. Kwan, Bethany M. |
author_facet | Holtrop, Jodi Summers Gurfinkel, Dennis Nederveld, Andrea Phimphasone-Brady, Phoutdavone Hosokawa, Patrick Rubinson, Claude Waxmonsky, Jeanette A. Kwan, Bethany M. |
author_sort | Holtrop, Jodi Summers |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Interventions are often adapted; some adaptations may provoke more favorable outcomes, whereas some may not. A better understanding of the adaptations and their intended goals may elucidate which adaptations produce better outcomes. Improved methods are needed to better capture and characterize the impact of intervention adaptations. METHODS: We used multiple data collection and analytic methods to characterize adaptations made by practices participating in a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study of a complex, multicomponent diabetes intervention. Data collection methods to identify adaptations included interviews, observations, and facilitator sessions resulting in transcripts, templated notes, and field notes. Adaptations gleaned from these sources were reduced and combined; then, their components were cataloged according to the framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions (FRAME). Analytic methods to characterize adaptations included a co-occurrence table, statistically based k-means clustering, and a taxonomic analysis. RESULTS: We found that (1) different data collection methods elicited more overall adaptations, (2) multiple data collection methods provided understanding of the components of and reasons for adaptation, and (3) analytic methods revealed ways that adaptation components cluster together in unique patterns producing adaptation “types.” These types may be useful for understanding how the “who, what, how, and why” of adaptations may fit together and for analyzing with outcome data to determine if the adaptations produce more favorable outcomes rather than by adaptation components individually. CONCLUSION: Adaptations were prevalent and discoverable through different methods. Enhancing methods to describe adaptations may better illuminate what works in providing improved intervention fit within context. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov under Trial number NCT03590041, posted July 18, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-022-01218-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9335955 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93359552022-07-30 Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research Holtrop, Jodi Summers Gurfinkel, Dennis Nederveld, Andrea Phimphasone-Brady, Phoutdavone Hosokawa, Patrick Rubinson, Claude Waxmonsky, Jeanette A. Kwan, Bethany M. Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Interventions are often adapted; some adaptations may provoke more favorable outcomes, whereas some may not. A better understanding of the adaptations and their intended goals may elucidate which adaptations produce better outcomes. Improved methods are needed to better capture and characterize the impact of intervention adaptations. METHODS: We used multiple data collection and analytic methods to characterize adaptations made by practices participating in a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study of a complex, multicomponent diabetes intervention. Data collection methods to identify adaptations included interviews, observations, and facilitator sessions resulting in transcripts, templated notes, and field notes. Adaptations gleaned from these sources were reduced and combined; then, their components were cataloged according to the framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions (FRAME). Analytic methods to characterize adaptations included a co-occurrence table, statistically based k-means clustering, and a taxonomic analysis. RESULTS: We found that (1) different data collection methods elicited more overall adaptations, (2) multiple data collection methods provided understanding of the components of and reasons for adaptation, and (3) analytic methods revealed ways that adaptation components cluster together in unique patterns producing adaptation “types.” These types may be useful for understanding how the “who, what, how, and why” of adaptations may fit together and for analyzing with outcome data to determine if the adaptations produce more favorable outcomes rather than by adaptation components individually. CONCLUSION: Adaptations were prevalent and discoverable through different methods. Enhancing methods to describe adaptations may better illuminate what works in providing improved intervention fit within context. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov under Trial number NCT03590041, posted July 18, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-022-01218-3. BioMed Central 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9335955/ /pubmed/35906602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01218-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Holtrop, Jodi Summers Gurfinkel, Dennis Nederveld, Andrea Phimphasone-Brady, Phoutdavone Hosokawa, Patrick Rubinson, Claude Waxmonsky, Jeanette A. Kwan, Bethany M. Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research |
title | Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research |
title_full | Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research |
title_fullStr | Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research |
title_short | Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research |
title_sort | methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335955/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01218-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holtropjodisummers methodsforcapturingandanalyzingadaptationsimplicationsforimplementationresearch AT gurfinkeldennis methodsforcapturingandanalyzingadaptationsimplicationsforimplementationresearch AT nederveldandrea methodsforcapturingandanalyzingadaptationsimplicationsforimplementationresearch AT phimphasonebradyphoutdavone methodsforcapturingandanalyzingadaptationsimplicationsforimplementationresearch AT hosokawapatrick methodsforcapturingandanalyzingadaptationsimplicationsforimplementationresearch AT rubinsonclaude methodsforcapturingandanalyzingadaptationsimplicationsforimplementationresearch AT waxmonskyjeanettea methodsforcapturingandanalyzingadaptationsimplicationsforimplementationresearch AT kwanbethanym methodsforcapturingandanalyzingadaptationsimplicationsforimplementationresearch |