Cargando…

Opioid-free anesthesia compared to opioid anesthesia for laparoscopic radical colectomy with pain threshold index monitoring: a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the depth of intraoperative analgesia with non-opioid anesthesia. This study evaluated whether opioid-free anesthesia can provide an effective analgesia-antinociception balance monitored by the / pain threshold index in laparoscopic radical colectomy. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: An, Guangquan, Wang, Guiying, Zhao, Bingsha, Zhang, Xiaoying, Li, Zhihan, Fu, Jianfeng, Zhao, Xuelian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01747-w
_version_ 1784759446423994368
author An, Guangquan
Wang, Guiying
Zhao, Bingsha
Zhang, Xiaoying
Li, Zhihan
Fu, Jianfeng
Zhao, Xuelian
author_facet An, Guangquan
Wang, Guiying
Zhao, Bingsha
Zhang, Xiaoying
Li, Zhihan
Fu, Jianfeng
Zhao, Xuelian
author_sort An, Guangquan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the depth of intraoperative analgesia with non-opioid anesthesia. This study evaluated whether opioid-free anesthesia can provide an effective analgesia-antinociception balance monitored by the / pain threshold index in laparoscopic radical colectomy. METHODS: We enrolled 102 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical colectomy with general anesthesia. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups to receive opioid-free anesthesia (group OFA) with dexmedetomidine (loading dose with 0.6 μg·kg(−1) for 10 min and then 0.5 μg·kg(−1)·h(−1) continuous infusion) and sevoflurane plus bilateral paravertebral blockade (0.2 μg·kg(−1) dexmedetomidine and 0.5% ropivacaine 15 ml per side) or opioid-based anesthesia (group OA) with remifentanil, sevoflurane, and bilateral paravertebral blockade (0.5% ropivacaine 15 ml per side). The primary outcome variable was pain intensity during the operation, as assessed by the pain threshold index with the multifunction combination monitor HXD- I. Results were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance and Student’s t-test. The secondary outcomes were wavelet index, lactic levels, and blood glucose concentration during the operation. The visual analog scale (VAS), rescue analgesic consumption, and side-effects of opioids after surgery were further assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were included in the analysis. Analysis revealed that the intraoperative pain threshold index readings were not significantly different between the groups from incision to the end of the operation (P = 0.06). Furthermore, similar changes in the brain wavelet index readings were observed in the OFA and OA groups. There was no statistical difference in VAS scores between the groups (P > 0.05); however, non-opioid anesthesia did reduce the rescue analgesic consumption after operation (P < 0.05). In the OFA group, the blood glucose levels increased by 20% compared to baseline and were significantly higher than those in the OA group (P < 0.001). The incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting, urine retention, intestinal paralysis and pruritus were not significantly different from those in the OA group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that compared to the opioid anesthesia regimen, our opioid-free anesthesia regimen achieved an equally effective intraoperative pain threshold index in laparoscopic radical colectomy. The incidence of opioid-related adverse reactions was not different between regimens, and intraoperative blood glucose levels were higher with opioid-free anesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900021223, 02/02/2019, Title: " Opioid-free anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial ". Website: hppts://www.chictr.ogr.cn
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9335965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93359652022-07-30 Opioid-free anesthesia compared to opioid anesthesia for laparoscopic radical colectomy with pain threshold index monitoring: a randomized controlled study An, Guangquan Wang, Guiying Zhao, Bingsha Zhang, Xiaoying Li, Zhihan Fu, Jianfeng Zhao, Xuelian BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the depth of intraoperative analgesia with non-opioid anesthesia. This study evaluated whether opioid-free anesthesia can provide an effective analgesia-antinociception balance monitored by the / pain threshold index in laparoscopic radical colectomy. METHODS: We enrolled 102 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical colectomy with general anesthesia. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups to receive opioid-free anesthesia (group OFA) with dexmedetomidine (loading dose with 0.6 μg·kg(−1) for 10 min and then 0.5 μg·kg(−1)·h(−1) continuous infusion) and sevoflurane plus bilateral paravertebral blockade (0.2 μg·kg(−1) dexmedetomidine and 0.5% ropivacaine 15 ml per side) or opioid-based anesthesia (group OA) with remifentanil, sevoflurane, and bilateral paravertebral blockade (0.5% ropivacaine 15 ml per side). The primary outcome variable was pain intensity during the operation, as assessed by the pain threshold index with the multifunction combination monitor HXD- I. Results were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance and Student’s t-test. The secondary outcomes were wavelet index, lactic levels, and blood glucose concentration during the operation. The visual analog scale (VAS), rescue analgesic consumption, and side-effects of opioids after surgery were further assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were included in the analysis. Analysis revealed that the intraoperative pain threshold index readings were not significantly different between the groups from incision to the end of the operation (P = 0.06). Furthermore, similar changes in the brain wavelet index readings were observed in the OFA and OA groups. There was no statistical difference in VAS scores between the groups (P > 0.05); however, non-opioid anesthesia did reduce the rescue analgesic consumption after operation (P < 0.05). In the OFA group, the blood glucose levels increased by 20% compared to baseline and were significantly higher than those in the OA group (P < 0.001). The incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting, urine retention, intestinal paralysis and pruritus were not significantly different from those in the OA group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that compared to the opioid anesthesia regimen, our opioid-free anesthesia regimen achieved an equally effective intraoperative pain threshold index in laparoscopic radical colectomy. The incidence of opioid-related adverse reactions was not different between regimens, and intraoperative blood glucose levels were higher with opioid-free anesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900021223, 02/02/2019, Title: " Opioid-free anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial ". Website: hppts://www.chictr.ogr.cn BioMed Central 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9335965/ /pubmed/35906554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01747-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
An, Guangquan
Wang, Guiying
Zhao, Bingsha
Zhang, Xiaoying
Li, Zhihan
Fu, Jianfeng
Zhao, Xuelian
Opioid-free anesthesia compared to opioid anesthesia for laparoscopic radical colectomy with pain threshold index monitoring: a randomized controlled study
title Opioid-free anesthesia compared to opioid anesthesia for laparoscopic radical colectomy with pain threshold index monitoring: a randomized controlled study
title_full Opioid-free anesthesia compared to opioid anesthesia for laparoscopic radical colectomy with pain threshold index monitoring: a randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Opioid-free anesthesia compared to opioid anesthesia for laparoscopic radical colectomy with pain threshold index monitoring: a randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Opioid-free anesthesia compared to opioid anesthesia for laparoscopic radical colectomy with pain threshold index monitoring: a randomized controlled study
title_short Opioid-free anesthesia compared to opioid anesthesia for laparoscopic radical colectomy with pain threshold index monitoring: a randomized controlled study
title_sort opioid-free anesthesia compared to opioid anesthesia for laparoscopic radical colectomy with pain threshold index monitoring: a randomized controlled study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01747-w
work_keys_str_mv AT anguangquan opioidfreeanesthesiacomparedtoopioidanesthesiaforlaparoscopicradicalcolectomywithpainthresholdindexmonitoringarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT wangguiying opioidfreeanesthesiacomparedtoopioidanesthesiaforlaparoscopicradicalcolectomywithpainthresholdindexmonitoringarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT zhaobingsha opioidfreeanesthesiacomparedtoopioidanesthesiaforlaparoscopicradicalcolectomywithpainthresholdindexmonitoringarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT zhangxiaoying opioidfreeanesthesiacomparedtoopioidanesthesiaforlaparoscopicradicalcolectomywithpainthresholdindexmonitoringarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT lizhihan opioidfreeanesthesiacomparedtoopioidanesthesiaforlaparoscopicradicalcolectomywithpainthresholdindexmonitoringarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT fujianfeng opioidfreeanesthesiacomparedtoopioidanesthesiaforlaparoscopicradicalcolectomywithpainthresholdindexmonitoringarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT zhaoxuelian opioidfreeanesthesiacomparedtoopioidanesthesiaforlaparoscopicradicalcolectomywithpainthresholdindexmonitoringarandomizedcontrolledstudy