Cargando…

Utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III online calculator to differentiate the primary progressive aphasia variants

The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III is a brief cognitive screening tool that is widely used for the detection and monitoring of dementia. Recent findings suggest that the three variants of primary progressive aphasia can be distinguished based on their distinct profiles on the five subdomain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foxe, D, Hu, A, Cheung, S C, Ahmed, R M, Cordato, N J, Devenney, E, Hwang, Y T, Halliday, G M, Mueller, N, Leyton, C E, Hodges, J R, Burrell, J R, Irish, M, Piguet, O
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9336588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35912134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac161
_version_ 1784759571452002304
author Foxe, D
Hu, A
Cheung, S C
Ahmed, R M
Cordato, N J
Devenney, E
Hwang, Y T
Halliday, G M
Mueller, N
Leyton, C E
Hodges, J R
Burrell, J R
Irish, M
Piguet, O
author_facet Foxe, D
Hu, A
Cheung, S C
Ahmed, R M
Cordato, N J
Devenney, E
Hwang, Y T
Halliday, G M
Mueller, N
Leyton, C E
Hodges, J R
Burrell, J R
Irish, M
Piguet, O
author_sort Foxe, D
collection PubMed
description The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III is a brief cognitive screening tool that is widely used for the detection and monitoring of dementia. Recent findings suggest that the three variants of primary progressive aphasia can be distinguished based on their distinct profiles on the five subdomain scores of this test. Here, we investigated the utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III to differentiate the primary progressive aphasia variants based on their item-by-item performance profiles on this test. From these results, we created an interactive primary progressive aphasia Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III calculator which predicts the variant based on a patient’s unique item-by-item profile. Twenty-eight logopenic variant, 25 non-fluent variant and 37 semantic variant primary progressive aphasia patients and 104 healthy controls completed the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III at first clinical presentation. Multinomial regression analyses were conducted to establish performance profiles among groups, and R Shiny from RStudio was used to create the interactive Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III diagnostic calculator. To verify its accuracy, probability values of the regression model were derived based on a 5-fold cross-validation of cases. The calculator’s accuracy was then verified in an independent sample of 17 logopenic, 19 non-fluent and 13 semantic variant primary progressive aphasia patients and 68 Alzheimer’s disease patients who had completed the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III (or an older version of this test: Revised) and had in vivo amyloid-PET imaging and/or brain autopsy pathological confirmation. Cross-validation of cases in the calculator model revealed different rates of sensitivity in classifying variants: semantic = 100%, non-fluent = 80.6% and logopenic = 79.9%; healthy controls were distinguished from primary progressive aphasia patients with 100% sensitivity. Verification of in vivo amyloid and/or autopsy-confirmed patients showed that the calculator correctly classified 10/13 (77%) semantic variant, 3/19 (16%) non-fluent variant and 4/17 (24%) logopenic variant patients. Importantly, for patients who were not classified, diagnostic probability values mostly pointed toward the correct clinical diagnosis. Furthermore, misclassified diagnoses of the primary progressive aphasia cohort were rare (1/49; 2%). Although 22 of the 68 Alzheimer’s disease patients (32%) were misclassified with primary progressive aphasia, 19/22 were misclassified with the logopenic variant (i.e. falling within the same neuropathological entity). The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III primary progressive aphasia diagnostic calculator demonstrates sound accuracy in differentiating the variants based on an item-by-item Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III profile. This calculator represents a new frontier in using data-driven approaches to differentiate the primary progressive aphasia variants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9336588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93365882022-07-29 Utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III online calculator to differentiate the primary progressive aphasia variants Foxe, D Hu, A Cheung, S C Ahmed, R M Cordato, N J Devenney, E Hwang, Y T Halliday, G M Mueller, N Leyton, C E Hodges, J R Burrell, J R Irish, M Piguet, O Brain Commun Original Article The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III is a brief cognitive screening tool that is widely used for the detection and monitoring of dementia. Recent findings suggest that the three variants of primary progressive aphasia can be distinguished based on their distinct profiles on the five subdomain scores of this test. Here, we investigated the utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III to differentiate the primary progressive aphasia variants based on their item-by-item performance profiles on this test. From these results, we created an interactive primary progressive aphasia Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III calculator which predicts the variant based on a patient’s unique item-by-item profile. Twenty-eight logopenic variant, 25 non-fluent variant and 37 semantic variant primary progressive aphasia patients and 104 healthy controls completed the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III at first clinical presentation. Multinomial regression analyses were conducted to establish performance profiles among groups, and R Shiny from RStudio was used to create the interactive Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III diagnostic calculator. To verify its accuracy, probability values of the regression model were derived based on a 5-fold cross-validation of cases. The calculator’s accuracy was then verified in an independent sample of 17 logopenic, 19 non-fluent and 13 semantic variant primary progressive aphasia patients and 68 Alzheimer’s disease patients who had completed the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III (or an older version of this test: Revised) and had in vivo amyloid-PET imaging and/or brain autopsy pathological confirmation. Cross-validation of cases in the calculator model revealed different rates of sensitivity in classifying variants: semantic = 100%, non-fluent = 80.6% and logopenic = 79.9%; healthy controls were distinguished from primary progressive aphasia patients with 100% sensitivity. Verification of in vivo amyloid and/or autopsy-confirmed patients showed that the calculator correctly classified 10/13 (77%) semantic variant, 3/19 (16%) non-fluent variant and 4/17 (24%) logopenic variant patients. Importantly, for patients who were not classified, diagnostic probability values mostly pointed toward the correct clinical diagnosis. Furthermore, misclassified diagnoses of the primary progressive aphasia cohort were rare (1/49; 2%). Although 22 of the 68 Alzheimer’s disease patients (32%) were misclassified with primary progressive aphasia, 19/22 were misclassified with the logopenic variant (i.e. falling within the same neuropathological entity). The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III primary progressive aphasia diagnostic calculator demonstrates sound accuracy in differentiating the variants based on an item-by-item Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III profile. This calculator represents a new frontier in using data-driven approaches to differentiate the primary progressive aphasia variants. Oxford University Press 2022-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9336588/ /pubmed/35912134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac161 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Foxe, D
Hu, A
Cheung, S C
Ahmed, R M
Cordato, N J
Devenney, E
Hwang, Y T
Halliday, G M
Mueller, N
Leyton, C E
Hodges, J R
Burrell, J R
Irish, M
Piguet, O
Utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III online calculator to differentiate the primary progressive aphasia variants
title Utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III online calculator to differentiate the primary progressive aphasia variants
title_full Utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III online calculator to differentiate the primary progressive aphasia variants
title_fullStr Utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III online calculator to differentiate the primary progressive aphasia variants
title_full_unstemmed Utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III online calculator to differentiate the primary progressive aphasia variants
title_short Utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III online calculator to differentiate the primary progressive aphasia variants
title_sort utility of the addenbrooke’s cognitive examination iii online calculator to differentiate the primary progressive aphasia variants
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9336588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35912134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac161
work_keys_str_mv AT foxed utilityoftheaddenbrookescognitiveexaminationiiionlinecalculatortodifferentiatetheprimaryprogressiveaphasiavariants
AT hua utilityoftheaddenbrookescognitiveexaminationiiionlinecalculatortodifferentiatetheprimaryprogressiveaphasiavariants
AT cheungsc utilityoftheaddenbrookescognitiveexaminationiiionlinecalculatortodifferentiatetheprimaryprogressiveaphasiavariants
AT ahmedrm utilityoftheaddenbrookescognitiveexaminationiiionlinecalculatortodifferentiatetheprimaryprogressiveaphasiavariants
AT cordatonj utilityoftheaddenbrookescognitiveexaminationiiionlinecalculatortodifferentiatetheprimaryprogressiveaphasiavariants
AT devenneye utilityoftheaddenbrookescognitiveexaminationiiionlinecalculatortodifferentiatetheprimaryprogressiveaphasiavariants
AT hwangyt utilityoftheaddenbrookescognitiveexaminationiiionlinecalculatortodifferentiatetheprimaryprogressiveaphasiavariants
AT hallidaygm utilityoftheaddenbrookescognitiveexaminationiiionlinecalculatortodifferentiatetheprimaryprogressiveaphasiavariants
AT muellern utilityoftheaddenbrookescognitiveexaminationiiionlinecalculatortodifferentiatetheprimaryprogressiveaphasiavariants
AT leytonce utilityoftheaddenbrookescognitiveexaminationiiionlinecalculatortodifferentiatetheprimaryprogressiveaphasiavariants
AT hodgesjr utilityoftheaddenbrookescognitiveexaminationiiionlinecalculatortodifferentiatetheprimaryprogressiveaphasiavariants
AT burrelljr utilityoftheaddenbrookescognitiveexaminationiiionlinecalculatortodifferentiatetheprimaryprogressiveaphasiavariants
AT irishm utilityoftheaddenbrookescognitiveexaminationiiionlinecalculatortodifferentiatetheprimaryprogressiveaphasiavariants
AT pigueto utilityoftheaddenbrookescognitiveexaminationiiionlinecalculatortodifferentiatetheprimaryprogressiveaphasiavariants