Cargando…
Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda
BACKGROUND: Daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is highly effective against HIV infection. However, the uptake of PrEP among individuals at high-risk of HIV acquisition in sub-Saharan Africa varies because of availability and acceptability. We assessed the acceptability of PrEP among part...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9337655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35905052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271104 |
_version_ | 1784759799830806528 |
---|---|
author | Nakamanya, Sarah Kawuma, Rachel Kibuuka, Denis Kusemererwa, Sylvia McCormack, Sheena Ruzagira, Eugene Seeley, Janet |
author_facet | Nakamanya, Sarah Kawuma, Rachel Kibuuka, Denis Kusemererwa, Sylvia McCormack, Sheena Ruzagira, Eugene Seeley, Janet |
author_sort | Nakamanya, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is highly effective against HIV infection. However, the uptake of PrEP among individuals at high-risk of HIV acquisition in sub-Saharan Africa varies because of availability and acceptability. We assessed the acceptability of PrEP among participants in a prospective HIV vaccine preparedness study in Masaka, southwestern Uganda. METHODS: From November 2018 to August 2019, 20 participants (10 female) were purposively selected for in-depth interviews (IDIs) at 3 and 9 months’ post-enrolment in the vaccine preparedness study. Four focus group discussions (FGD) (two among men) were conducted with 29 individuals categorized as: younger (18–24 years) men, younger (18–24 years) women, older (≥30 years) men, and older (≥30 years) women. Apart from IDI specific questions on recent life history including work experience, relationship history and places lived, topics for IDIs and FGDs included knowledge of HIV, perceptions of HIV risk (including own risk), knowledge of and use of PrEP. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability was used to structure a thematic framework approach for data analysis. RESULTS: Participants understood that PrEP was an oral pill taken daily by HIV negative individuals to prevent acquisition of HIV. Overall, interest in and acceptability of PrEP was high, more than half expressed positivity towards PrEP but were not ready to initiate taking it citing the burden of daily oral pill taking, related side effects, stigma and distrust of PrEP. Fourteen participants (from IDI and FGD) initiated PrEP, although some (one FGD and two IDI participants) stopped taking it due to side effects or perceived reduced risk. CONCLUSION: We observed a keen interest in PrEP initiation among our study participants. However, a limited understanding of PrEP and associated concerns impeded uptake and sustained use. Hence, interventions are needed to address end-user challenges to increase uptake and support adherence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9337655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93376552022-07-30 Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda Nakamanya, Sarah Kawuma, Rachel Kibuuka, Denis Kusemererwa, Sylvia McCormack, Sheena Ruzagira, Eugene Seeley, Janet PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is highly effective against HIV infection. However, the uptake of PrEP among individuals at high-risk of HIV acquisition in sub-Saharan Africa varies because of availability and acceptability. We assessed the acceptability of PrEP among participants in a prospective HIV vaccine preparedness study in Masaka, southwestern Uganda. METHODS: From November 2018 to August 2019, 20 participants (10 female) were purposively selected for in-depth interviews (IDIs) at 3 and 9 months’ post-enrolment in the vaccine preparedness study. Four focus group discussions (FGD) (two among men) were conducted with 29 individuals categorized as: younger (18–24 years) men, younger (18–24 years) women, older (≥30 years) men, and older (≥30 years) women. Apart from IDI specific questions on recent life history including work experience, relationship history and places lived, topics for IDIs and FGDs included knowledge of HIV, perceptions of HIV risk (including own risk), knowledge of and use of PrEP. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability was used to structure a thematic framework approach for data analysis. RESULTS: Participants understood that PrEP was an oral pill taken daily by HIV negative individuals to prevent acquisition of HIV. Overall, interest in and acceptability of PrEP was high, more than half expressed positivity towards PrEP but were not ready to initiate taking it citing the burden of daily oral pill taking, related side effects, stigma and distrust of PrEP. Fourteen participants (from IDI and FGD) initiated PrEP, although some (one FGD and two IDI participants) stopped taking it due to side effects or perceived reduced risk. CONCLUSION: We observed a keen interest in PrEP initiation among our study participants. However, a limited understanding of PrEP and associated concerns impeded uptake and sustained use. Hence, interventions are needed to address end-user challenges to increase uptake and support adherence. Public Library of Science 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9337655/ /pubmed/35905052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271104 Text en © 2022 Nakamanya et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nakamanya, Sarah Kawuma, Rachel Kibuuka, Denis Kusemererwa, Sylvia McCormack, Sheena Ruzagira, Eugene Seeley, Janet Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda |
title | Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda |
title_full | Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda |
title_fullStr | Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda |
title_short | Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda |
title_sort | assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (prep) among participants in an hiv vaccine preparedness study in southwestern uganda |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9337655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35905052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakamanyasarah assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda AT kawumarachel assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda AT kibuukadenis assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda AT kusemererwasylvia assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda AT mccormacksheena assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda AT ruzagiraeugene assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda AT seeleyjanet assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda AT assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda |