Cargando…

Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda

BACKGROUND: Daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is highly effective against HIV infection. However, the uptake of PrEP among individuals at high-risk of HIV acquisition in sub-Saharan Africa varies because of availability and acceptability. We assessed the acceptability of PrEP among part...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamanya, Sarah, Kawuma, Rachel, Kibuuka, Denis, Kusemererwa, Sylvia, McCormack, Sheena, Ruzagira, Eugene, Seeley, Janet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9337655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35905052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271104
_version_ 1784759799830806528
author Nakamanya, Sarah
Kawuma, Rachel
Kibuuka, Denis
Kusemererwa, Sylvia
McCormack, Sheena
Ruzagira, Eugene
Seeley, Janet
author_facet Nakamanya, Sarah
Kawuma, Rachel
Kibuuka, Denis
Kusemererwa, Sylvia
McCormack, Sheena
Ruzagira, Eugene
Seeley, Janet
author_sort Nakamanya, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is highly effective against HIV infection. However, the uptake of PrEP among individuals at high-risk of HIV acquisition in sub-Saharan Africa varies because of availability and acceptability. We assessed the acceptability of PrEP among participants in a prospective HIV vaccine preparedness study in Masaka, southwestern Uganda. METHODS: From November 2018 to August 2019, 20 participants (10 female) were purposively selected for in-depth interviews (IDIs) at 3 and 9 months’ post-enrolment in the vaccine preparedness study. Four focus group discussions (FGD) (two among men) were conducted with 29 individuals categorized as: younger (18–24 years) men, younger (18–24 years) women, older (≥30 years) men, and older (≥30 years) women. Apart from IDI specific questions on recent life history including work experience, relationship history and places lived, topics for IDIs and FGDs included knowledge of HIV, perceptions of HIV risk (including own risk), knowledge of and use of PrEP. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability was used to structure a thematic framework approach for data analysis. RESULTS: Participants understood that PrEP was an oral pill taken daily by HIV negative individuals to prevent acquisition of HIV. Overall, interest in and acceptability of PrEP was high, more than half expressed positivity towards PrEP but were not ready to initiate taking it citing the burden of daily oral pill taking, related side effects, stigma and distrust of PrEP. Fourteen participants (from IDI and FGD) initiated PrEP, although some (one FGD and two IDI participants) stopped taking it due to side effects or perceived reduced risk. CONCLUSION: We observed a keen interest in PrEP initiation among our study participants. However, a limited understanding of PrEP and associated concerns impeded uptake and sustained use. Hence, interventions are needed to address end-user challenges to increase uptake and support adherence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9337655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93376552022-07-30 Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda Nakamanya, Sarah Kawuma, Rachel Kibuuka, Denis Kusemererwa, Sylvia McCormack, Sheena Ruzagira, Eugene Seeley, Janet PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is highly effective against HIV infection. However, the uptake of PrEP among individuals at high-risk of HIV acquisition in sub-Saharan Africa varies because of availability and acceptability. We assessed the acceptability of PrEP among participants in a prospective HIV vaccine preparedness study in Masaka, southwestern Uganda. METHODS: From November 2018 to August 2019, 20 participants (10 female) were purposively selected for in-depth interviews (IDIs) at 3 and 9 months’ post-enrolment in the vaccine preparedness study. Four focus group discussions (FGD) (two among men) were conducted with 29 individuals categorized as: younger (18–24 years) men, younger (18–24 years) women, older (≥30 years) men, and older (≥30 years) women. Apart from IDI specific questions on recent life history including work experience, relationship history and places lived, topics for IDIs and FGDs included knowledge of HIV, perceptions of HIV risk (including own risk), knowledge of and use of PrEP. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability was used to structure a thematic framework approach for data analysis. RESULTS: Participants understood that PrEP was an oral pill taken daily by HIV negative individuals to prevent acquisition of HIV. Overall, interest in and acceptability of PrEP was high, more than half expressed positivity towards PrEP but were not ready to initiate taking it citing the burden of daily oral pill taking, related side effects, stigma and distrust of PrEP. Fourteen participants (from IDI and FGD) initiated PrEP, although some (one FGD and two IDI participants) stopped taking it due to side effects or perceived reduced risk. CONCLUSION: We observed a keen interest in PrEP initiation among our study participants. However, a limited understanding of PrEP and associated concerns impeded uptake and sustained use. Hence, interventions are needed to address end-user challenges to increase uptake and support adherence. Public Library of Science 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9337655/ /pubmed/35905052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271104 Text en © 2022 Nakamanya et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nakamanya, Sarah
Kawuma, Rachel
Kibuuka, Denis
Kusemererwa, Sylvia
McCormack, Sheena
Ruzagira, Eugene
Seeley, Janet
Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda
title Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda
title_full Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda
title_fullStr Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda
title_short Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda
title_sort assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (prep) among participants in an hiv vaccine preparedness study in southwestern uganda
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9337655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35905052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271104
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamanyasarah assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda
AT kawumarachel assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda
AT kibuukadenis assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda
AT kusemererwasylvia assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda
AT mccormacksheena assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda
AT ruzagiraeugene assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda
AT seeleyjanet assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda
AT assessingacceptabilityofpreexposureprophylaxisprepamongparticipantsinanhivvaccinepreparednessstudyinsouthwesternuganda