Cargando…

A Pilot Study on Approach Bias Modification in Smoking Cessation: Activating Personalized Alternative Activities for Smoking in the Context of Increased Craving

BACKGROUND: The act of smoking has been associated with the automatic activation of approach biases towards smoking-related stimuli. However, previous research has produced mixed findings when smokers are trained to avoid such smoking-related stimuli through the application of Approach Bias Modifica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wen, Si, Larsen, Helle, Wiers, Reinout W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34697780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-10033-x
_version_ 1784759899574501376
author Wen, Si
Larsen, Helle
Wiers, Reinout W.
author_facet Wen, Si
Larsen, Helle
Wiers, Reinout W.
author_sort Wen, Si
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The act of smoking has been associated with the automatic activation of approach biases towards smoking-related stimuli. However, previous research has produced mixed findings when smokers are trained to avoid such smoking-related stimuli through the application of Approach Bias Modification (ApBM). As such, this study aimed to test an improved ApBM (ApBM +), where smokers were trained to approach personalized alternative activities for smoking in the context of increased craving, in addition to training smoking-avoidance responses. METHODS: Sixty-seven daily smokers motivated to quit (M age = 29.27, 58.2% female) were randomly assigned to seven sessions of either ApBM + (n = 26), standard-ApBM (n = 19), or sham-ApBM (n = 22), after a brief motivational smoking intervention. Primary outcomes of approach biases for smoking and for alternative activities and secondary outcomes of smoking-related behaviors were assessed at pre-test, post-test, and 1-month follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, no group differences by condition were demonstrated in changing approach biases or smoking-related behaviors at post-test and 1-month follow-up. A trend level indication for differences in changes of smoking-approach biases between sham-ApBM and ApBM + for relatively heavy smokers was found at post-test. This was primarily driven by a significant increase in smoking-approach biases within the sham-ApBM condition and a trend decrease in smoking-approach biases within the ApBM + condition. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings did not provide support for the current ApBM + concerning improved effects across the whole sample. Diverging training effects on approach biases for smoking in relatively heavy smokers warrants further research, for which we provide some suggestions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-021-10033-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9338119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93381192022-07-31 A Pilot Study on Approach Bias Modification in Smoking Cessation: Activating Personalized Alternative Activities for Smoking in the Context of Increased Craving Wen, Si Larsen, Helle Wiers, Reinout W. Int J Behav Med Full Length Manuscript BACKGROUND: The act of smoking has been associated with the automatic activation of approach biases towards smoking-related stimuli. However, previous research has produced mixed findings when smokers are trained to avoid such smoking-related stimuli through the application of Approach Bias Modification (ApBM). As such, this study aimed to test an improved ApBM (ApBM +), where smokers were trained to approach personalized alternative activities for smoking in the context of increased craving, in addition to training smoking-avoidance responses. METHODS: Sixty-seven daily smokers motivated to quit (M age = 29.27, 58.2% female) were randomly assigned to seven sessions of either ApBM + (n = 26), standard-ApBM (n = 19), or sham-ApBM (n = 22), after a brief motivational smoking intervention. Primary outcomes of approach biases for smoking and for alternative activities and secondary outcomes of smoking-related behaviors were assessed at pre-test, post-test, and 1-month follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, no group differences by condition were demonstrated in changing approach biases or smoking-related behaviors at post-test and 1-month follow-up. A trend level indication for differences in changes of smoking-approach biases between sham-ApBM and ApBM + for relatively heavy smokers was found at post-test. This was primarily driven by a significant increase in smoking-approach biases within the sham-ApBM condition and a trend decrease in smoking-approach biases within the ApBM + condition. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings did not provide support for the current ApBM + concerning improved effects across the whole sample. Diverging training effects on approach biases for smoking in relatively heavy smokers warrants further research, for which we provide some suggestions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-021-10033-x. Springer US 2021-10-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9338119/ /pubmed/34697780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-10033-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Full Length Manuscript
Wen, Si
Larsen, Helle
Wiers, Reinout W.
A Pilot Study on Approach Bias Modification in Smoking Cessation: Activating Personalized Alternative Activities for Smoking in the Context of Increased Craving
title A Pilot Study on Approach Bias Modification in Smoking Cessation: Activating Personalized Alternative Activities for Smoking in the Context of Increased Craving
title_full A Pilot Study on Approach Bias Modification in Smoking Cessation: Activating Personalized Alternative Activities for Smoking in the Context of Increased Craving
title_fullStr A Pilot Study on Approach Bias Modification in Smoking Cessation: Activating Personalized Alternative Activities for Smoking in the Context of Increased Craving
title_full_unstemmed A Pilot Study on Approach Bias Modification in Smoking Cessation: Activating Personalized Alternative Activities for Smoking in the Context of Increased Craving
title_short A Pilot Study on Approach Bias Modification in Smoking Cessation: Activating Personalized Alternative Activities for Smoking in the Context of Increased Craving
title_sort pilot study on approach bias modification in smoking cessation: activating personalized alternative activities for smoking in the context of increased craving
topic Full Length Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34697780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-10033-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wensi apilotstudyonapproachbiasmodificationinsmokingcessationactivatingpersonalizedalternativeactivitiesforsmokinginthecontextofincreasedcraving
AT larsenhelle apilotstudyonapproachbiasmodificationinsmokingcessationactivatingpersonalizedalternativeactivitiesforsmokinginthecontextofincreasedcraving
AT wiersreinoutw apilotstudyonapproachbiasmodificationinsmokingcessationactivatingpersonalizedalternativeactivitiesforsmokinginthecontextofincreasedcraving
AT wensi pilotstudyonapproachbiasmodificationinsmokingcessationactivatingpersonalizedalternativeactivitiesforsmokinginthecontextofincreasedcraving
AT larsenhelle pilotstudyonapproachbiasmodificationinsmokingcessationactivatingpersonalizedalternativeactivitiesforsmokinginthecontextofincreasedcraving
AT wiersreinoutw pilotstudyonapproachbiasmodificationinsmokingcessationactivatingpersonalizedalternativeactivitiesforsmokinginthecontextofincreasedcraving