Cargando…
Assessing the Clinical Meaningfulness of the Alzheimer’s Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) Tool
INTRODUCTION: The Alzheimer’s Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) is a tool developed to detect clinical progression and measure treatment effect in patients in early stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The psychometric properties of the ADCOMS have been established; however, the threshold for clinical...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-022-00352-w |
_version_ | 1784759914456940544 |
---|---|
author | Tahami Monfared, Amir Abbas Lenderking, William R. Savva, Yulia Ladd, Mary Kate Zhang, Quanwu |
author_facet | Tahami Monfared, Amir Abbas Lenderking, William R. Savva, Yulia Ladd, Mary Kate Zhang, Quanwu |
author_sort | Tahami Monfared, Amir Abbas |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Alzheimer’s Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) is a tool developed to detect clinical progression and measure treatment effect in patients in early stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The psychometric properties of the ADCOMS have been established; however, the threshold for clinical meaningfulness has yet to be identified. METHODS: Anchor-based, distribution-based, and ROC curve analyses were used to estimate clinically meaningful thresholds for change in ADCOMS for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD dementia. This study included data from three sources: the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC), and a legacy dataset that included data from four sources: the placebo group from three MCI trials and an earlier data cut from ADNI. Results were stratified by disease severity (MCI vs. dementia) and APOE ε4 carrier status. RESULTS: A total of 5355 participants were included in the analysis. The ADCOMS was able to detect change for MCI and dementia patients who experienced a meaningful decline in cognition (as defined by the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes [CDR-SOB]) between baseline and month 12. The following ADCOMS cut-offs were proposed: 0.05 for MCI and 0.10 for dementia. CONCLUSIONS: The ADCOMS was previously established as a valid and reliable tool for use in clinical trials for MCI due to AD and dementia populations. By defining thresholds for clinically meaningful change of ADCOMS, this work is an important step in interpreting clinical findings and estimates of treatment effects in early stage AD trials. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-022-00352-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9338189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93381892022-07-31 Assessing the Clinical Meaningfulness of the Alzheimer’s Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) Tool Tahami Monfared, Amir Abbas Lenderking, William R. Savva, Yulia Ladd, Mary Kate Zhang, Quanwu Neurol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The Alzheimer’s Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) is a tool developed to detect clinical progression and measure treatment effect in patients in early stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The psychometric properties of the ADCOMS have been established; however, the threshold for clinical meaningfulness has yet to be identified. METHODS: Anchor-based, distribution-based, and ROC curve analyses were used to estimate clinically meaningful thresholds for change in ADCOMS for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD dementia. This study included data from three sources: the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC), and a legacy dataset that included data from four sources: the placebo group from three MCI trials and an earlier data cut from ADNI. Results were stratified by disease severity (MCI vs. dementia) and APOE ε4 carrier status. RESULTS: A total of 5355 participants were included in the analysis. The ADCOMS was able to detect change for MCI and dementia patients who experienced a meaningful decline in cognition (as defined by the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes [CDR-SOB]) between baseline and month 12. The following ADCOMS cut-offs were proposed: 0.05 for MCI and 0.10 for dementia. CONCLUSIONS: The ADCOMS was previously established as a valid and reliable tool for use in clinical trials for MCI due to AD and dementia populations. By defining thresholds for clinically meaningful change of ADCOMS, this work is an important step in interpreting clinical findings and estimates of treatment effects in early stage AD trials. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-022-00352-w. Springer Healthcare 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9338189/ /pubmed/35513767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-022-00352-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Tahami Monfared, Amir Abbas Lenderking, William R. Savva, Yulia Ladd, Mary Kate Zhang, Quanwu Assessing the Clinical Meaningfulness of the Alzheimer’s Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) Tool |
title | Assessing the Clinical Meaningfulness of the Alzheimer’s Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) Tool |
title_full | Assessing the Clinical Meaningfulness of the Alzheimer’s Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) Tool |
title_fullStr | Assessing the Clinical Meaningfulness of the Alzheimer’s Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) Tool |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the Clinical Meaningfulness of the Alzheimer’s Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) Tool |
title_short | Assessing the Clinical Meaningfulness of the Alzheimer’s Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) Tool |
title_sort | assessing the clinical meaningfulness of the alzheimer’s disease composite score (adcoms) tool |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-022-00352-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tahamimonfaredamirabbas assessingtheclinicalmeaningfulnessofthealzheimersdiseasecompositescoreadcomstool AT lenderkingwilliamr assessingtheclinicalmeaningfulnessofthealzheimersdiseasecompositescoreadcomstool AT savvayulia assessingtheclinicalmeaningfulnessofthealzheimersdiseasecompositescoreadcomstool AT laddmarykate assessingtheclinicalmeaningfulnessofthealzheimersdiseasecompositescoreadcomstool AT zhangquanwu assessingtheclinicalmeaningfulnessofthealzheimersdiseasecompositescoreadcomstool AT assessingtheclinicalmeaningfulnessofthealzheimersdiseasecompositescoreadcomstool |