Cargando…

Shear bond strength of different luting agents to polyether ether ketone

BACKGROUND: Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) was recently introduced to dentistry. However, difficulty in provision of a strong durable bond is its main drawback. Thus, precise surface treatment and use of a suitable luting agent are imperative for bonding of PEEK restorations. This study aimed to asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pourkhalili, Hossein, Asli, Hamid Neshandar, Toreihi, Newsha, Falahchai, Mehran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35915713
_version_ 1784759948450725888
author Pourkhalili, Hossein
Asli, Hamid Neshandar
Toreihi, Newsha
Falahchai, Mehran
author_facet Pourkhalili, Hossein
Asli, Hamid Neshandar
Toreihi, Newsha
Falahchai, Mehran
author_sort Pourkhalili, Hossein
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) was recently introduced to dentistry. However, difficulty in provision of a strong durable bond is its main drawback. Thus, precise surface treatment and use of a suitable luting agent are imperative for bonding of PEEK restorations. This study aimed to assess the effect of type of luting agent on shear bond strength (SBS) of PEEK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, 60 square-shaped PEEK samples were fabricated and sandblasted with 110 μm Al(2)O(3) particles. The samples were then divided into four groups based on the type of cement used (n = 15): zinc phosphate cement, Panavia F2, Panavia V5, and resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) cement. After bonding, the samples were thermocycled for 5000 cycles. The SBS was measured by a universal testing machine. The surface of samples was inspected under a video measuring machine to determine the mode of failure. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test via SPSS version 24 (α = 0.05). AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, 60 square-shaped PEEK samples were fabricated and sandblasted with 110 μm Al(2)O(3) particles. The samples were then divided into four groups based on the type of cement used (n = 15): zinc phosphate cement, Panavia F2, Panavia V5, and resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) cement. After bonding, the samples were thermocycled for 5000 cycles. The SBS was measured by a universal testing machine. The surface of samples was inspected under a video measuring machine to determine the mode of failure. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test via SPSS version 24 (α = 0.05). RESULTS: RMGI did not bond to PEEK. The SBS values were 4.02 ± 2.87 megapascals (MPa) for Panavia V5, 10.84 ± 6.05 MPa for Panavia F2, and 10.50 ± 2.88 MPa for zinc phosphate. The SBS in the Panavia V5 group was significantly lower than that in the Panavia F2 (P = 0.001) and zinc phosphate (P < 0.001) groups. No significant difference existed between the Panavia F2 and zinc phosphate groups in this respect (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Panavia F2 resin cement and zinc phosphate conventional cement provided the highest bond strength to PEEK, while RMGI did not bond to PEEK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9338352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93383522022-07-31 Shear bond strength of different luting agents to polyether ether ketone Pourkhalili, Hossein Asli, Hamid Neshandar Toreihi, Newsha Falahchai, Mehran Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) was recently introduced to dentistry. However, difficulty in provision of a strong durable bond is its main drawback. Thus, precise surface treatment and use of a suitable luting agent are imperative for bonding of PEEK restorations. This study aimed to assess the effect of type of luting agent on shear bond strength (SBS) of PEEK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, 60 square-shaped PEEK samples were fabricated and sandblasted with 110 μm Al(2)O(3) particles. The samples were then divided into four groups based on the type of cement used (n = 15): zinc phosphate cement, Panavia F2, Panavia V5, and resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) cement. After bonding, the samples were thermocycled for 5000 cycles. The SBS was measured by a universal testing machine. The surface of samples was inspected under a video measuring machine to determine the mode of failure. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test via SPSS version 24 (α = 0.05). AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, 60 square-shaped PEEK samples were fabricated and sandblasted with 110 μm Al(2)O(3) particles. The samples were then divided into four groups based on the type of cement used (n = 15): zinc phosphate cement, Panavia F2, Panavia V5, and resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) cement. After bonding, the samples were thermocycled for 5000 cycles. The SBS was measured by a universal testing machine. The surface of samples was inspected under a video measuring machine to determine the mode of failure. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test via SPSS version 24 (α = 0.05). RESULTS: RMGI did not bond to PEEK. The SBS values were 4.02 ± 2.87 megapascals (MPa) for Panavia V5, 10.84 ± 6.05 MPa for Panavia F2, and 10.50 ± 2.88 MPa for zinc phosphate. The SBS in the Panavia V5 group was significantly lower than that in the Panavia F2 (P = 0.001) and zinc phosphate (P < 0.001) groups. No significant difference existed between the Panavia F2 and zinc phosphate groups in this respect (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Panavia F2 resin cement and zinc phosphate conventional cement provided the highest bond strength to PEEK, while RMGI did not bond to PEEK. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9338352/ /pubmed/35915713 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Dental Research Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pourkhalili, Hossein
Asli, Hamid Neshandar
Toreihi, Newsha
Falahchai, Mehran
Shear bond strength of different luting agents to polyether ether ketone
title Shear bond strength of different luting agents to polyether ether ketone
title_full Shear bond strength of different luting agents to polyether ether ketone
title_fullStr Shear bond strength of different luting agents to polyether ether ketone
title_full_unstemmed Shear bond strength of different luting agents to polyether ether ketone
title_short Shear bond strength of different luting agents to polyether ether ketone
title_sort shear bond strength of different luting agents to polyether ether ketone
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35915713
work_keys_str_mv AT pourkhalilihossein shearbondstrengthofdifferentlutingagentstopolyetheretherketone
AT aslihamidneshandar shearbondstrengthofdifferentlutingagentstopolyetheretherketone
AT toreihinewsha shearbondstrengthofdifferentlutingagentstopolyetheretherketone
AT falahchaimehran shearbondstrengthofdifferentlutingagentstopolyetheretherketone