Patients-associated compound etiology may have more severe acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Currently, the concept of “a single cause results in acute pancreatitis (AP)” has been deeply incorporated into clinical practice, whereas the concept of “compound-etiology” has not attract considerable attention. This study aimed to explore the impact of the category of etiology on AP clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients with AP hospitalized within 72 h of symptom onset were retrospectively enrolled in this study from January 2014 to October 2019. AP etiology was classified into two main categories: single-etiology and compound-etiology category. The single-etiology category mainly includes biliary, hypertriglyceridemia (HTG), and alcohol. The compound-etiology category refers to AP with two or more causes, which mainly include dual-etiology and triple-etiology category, that is the biliary-HTG type, HTG-alcoholic type, and biliary-HTG-alcoholic type. The general information and clinical outcomes were reviewed and compared in AP patients with different etiologies. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-eight out of a total of 904 AP patients belonged to the compound-etiology category. Compared with the single-etiology category, the patients in the compound-etiology category were younger, more predominantly male, more likely to be obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2)) and more likely to have pre-existing diabetes. The clinical outcomes were worse for patients with increasing complexity of etiology type, as shown by comparison of the incidence of any organ failure (P<0.001); persistent organ failure (POF) (P<0.001); intensive care unit need (P<0.001); local complications (P<0.001). AP with HTG had a higher rate of POF (P=0.032) and acute necrotic collection (P=0.013) than AP with biliary or alcohol involvement. When other etiologies simultaneously accompanied HTG-AP, the clinical outcomes were significantly worse than those in HTG-AP without other etiologies, particularly the biliary-HTG-alcoholic type. The compound-etiology category was independently associated with POF [odds ratio (OR): 2.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.65–3.72, P<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the importance of determining AP etiology and the prevalence of the “compound-type” etiology. The compound-etiology category should be recognized as a separate concept in AP etiology and deserve higher priority.