Cargando…

Comparison of arthroscopic internal drainage and open excision for the treatment of popliteal cysts

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to introduce the arthroscopic internal drainage with anterior-anteromedial approach for the treatment of popliteal cysts in children. To compare its clinical efficacy with open surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective case–control study of 102 patients dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: You, Chao, Cheng, Zhen, Xia, Yongjie, Deng, Chao, Zhou, Yibiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05658-2
_version_ 1784759999955730432
author You, Chao
Cheng, Zhen
Xia, Yongjie
Deng, Chao
Zhou, Yibiao
author_facet You, Chao
Cheng, Zhen
Xia, Yongjie
Deng, Chao
Zhou, Yibiao
author_sort You, Chao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to introduce the arthroscopic internal drainage with anterior-anteromedial approach for the treatment of popliteal cysts in children. To compare its clinical efficacy with open surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective case–control study of 102 patients diagnosed with popliteal cysts from January 2018 to February 2020 who received surgery. The study included 27 cases with minimally invasive group (MI group) and 75 cases with open surgery group (OS group). The MI group included 21 males and 6 females, age 6.71 ± 2.16 years who received arthroscopic internal drainage of the cysts to adequately widen the valve opening between the cyst and the articular cavity, excised the fibrous diaphragm without complete excision of the cyst wall. The OS group included 57 males and 18 females, age 6.21 ± 1.67 years who received open excision. The clinical parameters regarding the preoperative characteristics and surgical results were compared. Ultrasound or MRI was used to identify the recurrence of the popliteal cysts. Rauschning-Lindgren grade was recorded to evaluate the clinical outcome. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for at least 24 months. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, gender, left and right sides, disease time, cyst size, length of hospitalization, preoperative Rauschning-Lindgren grade (p > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the preoperative and postoperative Rauschning-Lindgren grade was improved in both groups. Compared with the OS group, operation time was significantly shortened in the MI group (28.89 ± 4.51 min vs 52.96 ± 29.72 min, p < 0.05). The MI group was superior to the OS group in terms of blood loss and plaster fixation, with statistical significance (p < 0.05). There was obvious difference in recurrence rate between the two groups (0% vs 17.33%, p = 0.018). No postoperative complications occurred during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with open excision, the treatment of popliteal cyst in children by arthroscopic internal drainage to expand the articular cavity and eliminate the “one-way valve” mechanism between the cyst and the articular cavity exhibits better clinical outcomes and significantly reduces the recurrence rate, which is worthy of further clinical promotion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9338577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93385772022-07-31 Comparison of arthroscopic internal drainage and open excision for the treatment of popliteal cysts You, Chao Cheng, Zhen Xia, Yongjie Deng, Chao Zhou, Yibiao BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to introduce the arthroscopic internal drainage with anterior-anteromedial approach for the treatment of popliteal cysts in children. To compare its clinical efficacy with open surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective case–control study of 102 patients diagnosed with popliteal cysts from January 2018 to February 2020 who received surgery. The study included 27 cases with minimally invasive group (MI group) and 75 cases with open surgery group (OS group). The MI group included 21 males and 6 females, age 6.71 ± 2.16 years who received arthroscopic internal drainage of the cysts to adequately widen the valve opening between the cyst and the articular cavity, excised the fibrous diaphragm without complete excision of the cyst wall. The OS group included 57 males and 18 females, age 6.21 ± 1.67 years who received open excision. The clinical parameters regarding the preoperative characteristics and surgical results were compared. Ultrasound or MRI was used to identify the recurrence of the popliteal cysts. Rauschning-Lindgren grade was recorded to evaluate the clinical outcome. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for at least 24 months. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, gender, left and right sides, disease time, cyst size, length of hospitalization, preoperative Rauschning-Lindgren grade (p > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the preoperative and postoperative Rauschning-Lindgren grade was improved in both groups. Compared with the OS group, operation time was significantly shortened in the MI group (28.89 ± 4.51 min vs 52.96 ± 29.72 min, p < 0.05). The MI group was superior to the OS group in terms of blood loss and plaster fixation, with statistical significance (p < 0.05). There was obvious difference in recurrence rate between the two groups (0% vs 17.33%, p = 0.018). No postoperative complications occurred during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with open excision, the treatment of popliteal cyst in children by arthroscopic internal drainage to expand the articular cavity and eliminate the “one-way valve” mechanism between the cyst and the articular cavity exhibits better clinical outcomes and significantly reduces the recurrence rate, which is worthy of further clinical promotion. BioMed Central 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9338577/ /pubmed/35907946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05658-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
You, Chao
Cheng, Zhen
Xia, Yongjie
Deng, Chao
Zhou, Yibiao
Comparison of arthroscopic internal drainage and open excision for the treatment of popliteal cysts
title Comparison of arthroscopic internal drainage and open excision for the treatment of popliteal cysts
title_full Comparison of arthroscopic internal drainage and open excision for the treatment of popliteal cysts
title_fullStr Comparison of arthroscopic internal drainage and open excision for the treatment of popliteal cysts
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of arthroscopic internal drainage and open excision for the treatment of popliteal cysts
title_short Comparison of arthroscopic internal drainage and open excision for the treatment of popliteal cysts
title_sort comparison of arthroscopic internal drainage and open excision for the treatment of popliteal cysts
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05658-2
work_keys_str_mv AT youchao comparisonofarthroscopicinternaldrainageandopenexcisionforthetreatmentofpoplitealcysts
AT chengzhen comparisonofarthroscopicinternaldrainageandopenexcisionforthetreatmentofpoplitealcysts
AT xiayongjie comparisonofarthroscopicinternaldrainageandopenexcisionforthetreatmentofpoplitealcysts
AT dengchao comparisonofarthroscopicinternaldrainageandopenexcisionforthetreatmentofpoplitealcysts
AT zhouyibiao comparisonofarthroscopicinternaldrainageandopenexcisionforthetreatmentofpoplitealcysts