Cargando…

Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences

BACKGROUND: Rapid reviews have emerged as an approach to provide contextualized evidence in a timely and efficient manner. Three rapid review centers were established in Ethiopia, Lebanon, and South Africa through the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, to sti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona M., Kawooya, Ismael, Kayongo, Edward, Izizinga, Rose, Mamuye, Hadis, Amog, Krystle, Langlois, Etienne V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02021-3
_version_ 1784760008202780672
author Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona M.
Kawooya, Ismael
Kayongo, Edward
Izizinga, Rose
Mamuye, Hadis
Amog, Krystle
Langlois, Etienne V.
author_facet Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona M.
Kawooya, Ismael
Kayongo, Edward
Izizinga, Rose
Mamuye, Hadis
Amog, Krystle
Langlois, Etienne V.
author_sort Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rapid reviews have emerged as an approach to provide contextualized evidence in a timely and efficient manner. Three rapid review centers were established in Ethiopia, Lebanon, and South Africa through the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, to stimulate demand, engage policymakers, and produce rapid reviews to support health policy and systems decision-making. This study aimed to assess the experiences of researchers and policymakers engaged in producing and using rapid reviews for health systems strengthening and decisions towards universal health coverage (UHC). METHODS: Using a case study approach with qualitative research methods, experienced researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with respondents from each center (n = 16). The topics covered included the process and experience of establishing the centers, stimulating demand for rapid reviews, collaborating between researchers and policymakers, and disseminating and using rapid reviews for health policies and interventions and the potential for sustaining and institutionalizing the services. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Major themes interacted and contributed to shape the experiences of stakeholders of the rapid review centers, including the following: organizational structural arrangements of the centers, management of their processes as input factors, and the rapid reviews as the immediate policy-relevant outputs. The engagement process and the rapid review products contributed to a final theme of impact of the rapid review centers in relation to the uptake of evidence for policy and systems decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: The experiences of policymakers and researchers of the rapid review centers determined the uptake of evidence. The findings of this study can inform policymakers, health system managers, and researchers on best practices for demanding, developing and using rapid reviews to support decision- and policymaking, and implementing the universal healthcare coverage agenda.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9338611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93386112022-07-31 Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona M. Kawooya, Ismael Kayongo, Edward Izizinga, Rose Mamuye, Hadis Amog, Krystle Langlois, Etienne V. Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Rapid reviews have emerged as an approach to provide contextualized evidence in a timely and efficient manner. Three rapid review centers were established in Ethiopia, Lebanon, and South Africa through the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, to stimulate demand, engage policymakers, and produce rapid reviews to support health policy and systems decision-making. This study aimed to assess the experiences of researchers and policymakers engaged in producing and using rapid reviews for health systems strengthening and decisions towards universal health coverage (UHC). METHODS: Using a case study approach with qualitative research methods, experienced researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with respondents from each center (n = 16). The topics covered included the process and experience of establishing the centers, stimulating demand for rapid reviews, collaborating between researchers and policymakers, and disseminating and using rapid reviews for health policies and interventions and the potential for sustaining and institutionalizing the services. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Major themes interacted and contributed to shape the experiences of stakeholders of the rapid review centers, including the following: organizational structural arrangements of the centers, management of their processes as input factors, and the rapid reviews as the immediate policy-relevant outputs. The engagement process and the rapid review products contributed to a final theme of impact of the rapid review centers in relation to the uptake of evidence for policy and systems decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: The experiences of policymakers and researchers of the rapid review centers determined the uptake of evidence. The findings of this study can inform policymakers, health system managers, and researchers on best practices for demanding, developing and using rapid reviews to support decision- and policymaking, and implementing the universal healthcare coverage agenda. BioMed Central 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9338611/ /pubmed/35907879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02021-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona M.
Kawooya, Ismael
Kayongo, Edward
Izizinga, Rose
Mamuye, Hadis
Amog, Krystle
Langlois, Etienne V.
Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences
title Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences
title_full Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences
title_fullStr Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences
title_full_unstemmed Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences
title_short Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences
title_sort paper 1: demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from lebanon, ethiopia, and south africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02021-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mijumbideverhonam paper1demanddrivenrapidreviewsforhealthpolicyandsystemsdecisionmakinglessonsfromlebanonethiopiaandsouthafricaonresearchersandpolicymakersexperiences
AT kawooyaismael paper1demanddrivenrapidreviewsforhealthpolicyandsystemsdecisionmakinglessonsfromlebanonethiopiaandsouthafricaonresearchersandpolicymakersexperiences
AT kayongoedward paper1demanddrivenrapidreviewsforhealthpolicyandsystemsdecisionmakinglessonsfromlebanonethiopiaandsouthafricaonresearchersandpolicymakersexperiences
AT izizingarose paper1demanddrivenrapidreviewsforhealthpolicyandsystemsdecisionmakinglessonsfromlebanonethiopiaandsouthafricaonresearchersandpolicymakersexperiences
AT mamuyehadis paper1demanddrivenrapidreviewsforhealthpolicyandsystemsdecisionmakinglessonsfromlebanonethiopiaandsouthafricaonresearchersandpolicymakersexperiences
AT amogkrystle paper1demanddrivenrapidreviewsforhealthpolicyandsystemsdecisionmakinglessonsfromlebanonethiopiaandsouthafricaonresearchersandpolicymakersexperiences
AT langloisetiennev paper1demanddrivenrapidreviewsforhealthpolicyandsystemsdecisionmakinglessonsfromlebanonethiopiaandsouthafricaonresearchersandpolicymakersexperiences