Cargando…
Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences
BACKGROUND: Rapid reviews have emerged as an approach to provide contextualized evidence in a timely and efficient manner. Three rapid review centers were established in Ethiopia, Lebanon, and South Africa through the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, to sti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02021-3 |
_version_ | 1784760008202780672 |
---|---|
author | Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona M. Kawooya, Ismael Kayongo, Edward Izizinga, Rose Mamuye, Hadis Amog, Krystle Langlois, Etienne V. |
author_facet | Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona M. Kawooya, Ismael Kayongo, Edward Izizinga, Rose Mamuye, Hadis Amog, Krystle Langlois, Etienne V. |
author_sort | Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rapid reviews have emerged as an approach to provide contextualized evidence in a timely and efficient manner. Three rapid review centers were established in Ethiopia, Lebanon, and South Africa through the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, to stimulate demand, engage policymakers, and produce rapid reviews to support health policy and systems decision-making. This study aimed to assess the experiences of researchers and policymakers engaged in producing and using rapid reviews for health systems strengthening and decisions towards universal health coverage (UHC). METHODS: Using a case study approach with qualitative research methods, experienced researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with respondents from each center (n = 16). The topics covered included the process and experience of establishing the centers, stimulating demand for rapid reviews, collaborating between researchers and policymakers, and disseminating and using rapid reviews for health policies and interventions and the potential for sustaining and institutionalizing the services. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Major themes interacted and contributed to shape the experiences of stakeholders of the rapid review centers, including the following: organizational structural arrangements of the centers, management of their processes as input factors, and the rapid reviews as the immediate policy-relevant outputs. The engagement process and the rapid review products contributed to a final theme of impact of the rapid review centers in relation to the uptake of evidence for policy and systems decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: The experiences of policymakers and researchers of the rapid review centers determined the uptake of evidence. The findings of this study can inform policymakers, health system managers, and researchers on best practices for demanding, developing and using rapid reviews to support decision- and policymaking, and implementing the universal healthcare coverage agenda. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9338611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93386112022-07-31 Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona M. Kawooya, Ismael Kayongo, Edward Izizinga, Rose Mamuye, Hadis Amog, Krystle Langlois, Etienne V. Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Rapid reviews have emerged as an approach to provide contextualized evidence in a timely and efficient manner. Three rapid review centers were established in Ethiopia, Lebanon, and South Africa through the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, to stimulate demand, engage policymakers, and produce rapid reviews to support health policy and systems decision-making. This study aimed to assess the experiences of researchers and policymakers engaged in producing and using rapid reviews for health systems strengthening and decisions towards universal health coverage (UHC). METHODS: Using a case study approach with qualitative research methods, experienced researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with respondents from each center (n = 16). The topics covered included the process and experience of establishing the centers, stimulating demand for rapid reviews, collaborating between researchers and policymakers, and disseminating and using rapid reviews for health policies and interventions and the potential for sustaining and institutionalizing the services. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Major themes interacted and contributed to shape the experiences of stakeholders of the rapid review centers, including the following: organizational structural arrangements of the centers, management of their processes as input factors, and the rapid reviews as the immediate policy-relevant outputs. The engagement process and the rapid review products contributed to a final theme of impact of the rapid review centers in relation to the uptake of evidence for policy and systems decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: The experiences of policymakers and researchers of the rapid review centers determined the uptake of evidence. The findings of this study can inform policymakers, health system managers, and researchers on best practices for demanding, developing and using rapid reviews to support decision- and policymaking, and implementing the universal healthcare coverage agenda. BioMed Central 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9338611/ /pubmed/35907879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02021-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona M. Kawooya, Ismael Kayongo, Edward Izizinga, Rose Mamuye, Hadis Amog, Krystle Langlois, Etienne V. Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences |
title | Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences |
title_full | Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences |
title_fullStr | Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences |
title_full_unstemmed | Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences |
title_short | Paper 1: Demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from Lebanon, Ethiopia, and South Africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences |
title_sort | paper 1: demand-driven rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: lessons from lebanon, ethiopia, and south africa on researchers and policymakers’ experiences |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02021-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mijumbideverhonam paper1demanddrivenrapidreviewsforhealthpolicyandsystemsdecisionmakinglessonsfromlebanonethiopiaandsouthafricaonresearchersandpolicymakersexperiences AT kawooyaismael paper1demanddrivenrapidreviewsforhealthpolicyandsystemsdecisionmakinglessonsfromlebanonethiopiaandsouthafricaonresearchersandpolicymakersexperiences AT kayongoedward paper1demanddrivenrapidreviewsforhealthpolicyandsystemsdecisionmakinglessonsfromlebanonethiopiaandsouthafricaonresearchersandpolicymakersexperiences AT izizingarose paper1demanddrivenrapidreviewsforhealthpolicyandsystemsdecisionmakinglessonsfromlebanonethiopiaandsouthafricaonresearchersandpolicymakersexperiences AT mamuyehadis paper1demanddrivenrapidreviewsforhealthpolicyandsystemsdecisionmakinglessonsfromlebanonethiopiaandsouthafricaonresearchersandpolicymakersexperiences AT amogkrystle paper1demanddrivenrapidreviewsforhealthpolicyandsystemsdecisionmakinglessonsfromlebanonethiopiaandsouthafricaonresearchersandpolicymakersexperiences AT langloisetiennev paper1demanddrivenrapidreviewsforhealthpolicyandsystemsdecisionmakinglessonsfromlebanonethiopiaandsouthafricaonresearchersandpolicymakersexperiences |