Cargando…

Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and feasibility of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation followed by ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage (USg-D&C) for two types patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP-I and CSP-II). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yanglu, Yin, Qiaozhi, Xu, Fan, Luo, Shuang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04848-z
_version_ 1784760013450903552
author Liu, Yanglu
Yin, Qiaozhi
Xu, Fan
Luo, Shuang
author_facet Liu, Yanglu
Yin, Qiaozhi
Xu, Fan
Luo, Shuang
author_sort Liu, Yanglu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and feasibility of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation followed by ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage (USg-D&C) for two types patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP-I and CSP-II). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of 101 CSP-I patients and 52 CSP-II patients who received HIFU ablation followed by USg-D&C from Jun 2014 to Oct 2020. The diameter of gestational sac/mass, thickness of the intervening myometrium, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, length of hospital stays, adverse effects and β-HCG level in the two groups were compared. RESULTS: All patients successfully received HIFU ablation under conscious sedation. The median total treatment time of HIFU ablation and median USg-D&C time in the CSP-I group were statistically longer than those in the CSP-II group (P < 0.05). The average intraoperative median blood loss was 39 ml in the CSP-I group and 65 ml in the CSP-II group (P < 0.05). The duration of hospitalization was 7.07 ± 1.83 days in the CSP-I group and 7.18 ± 1.72 days in the CSP-II group (P > 0.05). The average time needed for β-HCG return to normal levels was 26.08 ± 5.02. and 28.15 ± 4.99 days for CSP-I and CSP-II, respectively (P > 0.05). The percentage of adverse effects and complications was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HIFU ablation followed by USg-D&C was safe and effective in treating the CSP-I patients and CSP-II patients, which may be a potential noninvasive therapeutic option for patients with CSP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9338633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93386332022-07-31 Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II Liu, Yanglu Yin, Qiaozhi Xu, Fan Luo, Shuang BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and feasibility of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation followed by ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage (USg-D&C) for two types patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP-I and CSP-II). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of 101 CSP-I patients and 52 CSP-II patients who received HIFU ablation followed by USg-D&C from Jun 2014 to Oct 2020. The diameter of gestational sac/mass, thickness of the intervening myometrium, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, length of hospital stays, adverse effects and β-HCG level in the two groups were compared. RESULTS: All patients successfully received HIFU ablation under conscious sedation. The median total treatment time of HIFU ablation and median USg-D&C time in the CSP-I group were statistically longer than those in the CSP-II group (P < 0.05). The average intraoperative median blood loss was 39 ml in the CSP-I group and 65 ml in the CSP-II group (P < 0.05). The duration of hospitalization was 7.07 ± 1.83 days in the CSP-I group and 7.18 ± 1.72 days in the CSP-II group (P > 0.05). The average time needed for β-HCG return to normal levels was 26.08 ± 5.02. and 28.15 ± 4.99 days for CSP-I and CSP-II, respectively (P > 0.05). The percentage of adverse effects and complications was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HIFU ablation followed by USg-D&C was safe and effective in treating the CSP-I patients and CSP-II patients, which may be a potential noninvasive therapeutic option for patients with CSP. BioMed Central 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9338633/ /pubmed/35907811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04848-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Yanglu
Yin, Qiaozhi
Xu, Fan
Luo, Shuang
Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II
title Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II
title_full Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II
title_short Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II
title_sort clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (hifu) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (csp) i and ii
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04848-z
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyanglu clinicalefficacyandsafetyofhighintensityfocusedultrasoundhifuablationintreatmentofcesareanscarpregnancycspiandii
AT yinqiaozhi clinicalefficacyandsafetyofhighintensityfocusedultrasoundhifuablationintreatmentofcesareanscarpregnancycspiandii
AT xufan clinicalefficacyandsafetyofhighintensityfocusedultrasoundhifuablationintreatmentofcesareanscarpregnancycspiandii
AT luoshuang clinicalefficacyandsafetyofhighintensityfocusedultrasoundhifuablationintreatmentofcesareanscarpregnancycspiandii