Cargando…

Exploring Inductive Linearization for simulation and estimation with an application to the Michaelis–Menten model

Nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are common in pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic systems. Although their exact solutions cannot generally be determined via algebraic methods, their rapid and accurate solutions are desirable. Thus, numerical methods have a critical role. Inductive Linea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharif, Sepideh, Hasegawa, Chihiro, Duffull, Stephen B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35788853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10928-022-09813-z
_version_ 1784760068728684544
author Sharif, Sepideh
Hasegawa, Chihiro
Duffull, Stephen B.
author_facet Sharif, Sepideh
Hasegawa, Chihiro
Duffull, Stephen B.
author_sort Sharif, Sepideh
collection PubMed
description Nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are common in pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic systems. Although their exact solutions cannot generally be determined via algebraic methods, their rapid and accurate solutions are desirable. Thus, numerical methods have a critical role. Inductive Linearization was proposed as a method to solve systems of nonlinear ODEs. It is an iterative approach that converts a nonlinear ODE into a linear time-varying (LTV) ODE, for which a range of standard integration techniques can then be used to solve (e.g., eigenvalue decomposition [EVD]). This study explores the properties of Inductive Linearization when coupled with EVD for integration of the LTV ODE and illustrates how the efficiency of the method can be improved. Improvements were based on three approaches, (1) incorporation of a convergence criterion for the iterative linearization process (for simulation and estimation), (2) creating more efficient step sizes for EVD (for simulation and estimation), and (3) updating the initial conditions of the Inductive Linearization (for estimation). The performance of these improvements were evaluated using single subject stochastic simulation-estimation with an application to a simple pharmacokinetic model with Michaelis–Menten elimination. The reference comparison was a standard non-stiff Runge–Kutta method with variable step size (ode45, MATLAB). Each of the approaches improved the speed of the Inductive Linearization technique without diminishing accuracy which, in this simple case, was faster than ode45 with comparable accuracy in the parameter estimates. The methods described here can easily be implemented in standard software programme such as R or MATLAB. Further work is needed to explore this technique for estimation in a population approach setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10928-022-09813-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9338916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93389162022-08-01 Exploring Inductive Linearization for simulation and estimation with an application to the Michaelis–Menten model Sharif, Sepideh Hasegawa, Chihiro Duffull, Stephen B. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Original Paper Nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are common in pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic systems. Although their exact solutions cannot generally be determined via algebraic methods, their rapid and accurate solutions are desirable. Thus, numerical methods have a critical role. Inductive Linearization was proposed as a method to solve systems of nonlinear ODEs. It is an iterative approach that converts a nonlinear ODE into a linear time-varying (LTV) ODE, for which a range of standard integration techniques can then be used to solve (e.g., eigenvalue decomposition [EVD]). This study explores the properties of Inductive Linearization when coupled with EVD for integration of the LTV ODE and illustrates how the efficiency of the method can be improved. Improvements were based on three approaches, (1) incorporation of a convergence criterion for the iterative linearization process (for simulation and estimation), (2) creating more efficient step sizes for EVD (for simulation and estimation), and (3) updating the initial conditions of the Inductive Linearization (for estimation). The performance of these improvements were evaluated using single subject stochastic simulation-estimation with an application to a simple pharmacokinetic model with Michaelis–Menten elimination. The reference comparison was a standard non-stiff Runge–Kutta method with variable step size (ode45, MATLAB). Each of the approaches improved the speed of the Inductive Linearization technique without diminishing accuracy which, in this simple case, was faster than ode45 with comparable accuracy in the parameter estimates. The methods described here can easily be implemented in standard software programme such as R or MATLAB. Further work is needed to explore this technique for estimation in a population approach setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10928-022-09813-z. Springer US 2022-07-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9338916/ /pubmed/35788853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10928-022-09813-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Sharif, Sepideh
Hasegawa, Chihiro
Duffull, Stephen B.
Exploring Inductive Linearization for simulation and estimation with an application to the Michaelis–Menten model
title Exploring Inductive Linearization for simulation and estimation with an application to the Michaelis–Menten model
title_full Exploring Inductive Linearization for simulation and estimation with an application to the Michaelis–Menten model
title_fullStr Exploring Inductive Linearization for simulation and estimation with an application to the Michaelis–Menten model
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Inductive Linearization for simulation and estimation with an application to the Michaelis–Menten model
title_short Exploring Inductive Linearization for simulation and estimation with an application to the Michaelis–Menten model
title_sort exploring inductive linearization for simulation and estimation with an application to the michaelis–menten model
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35788853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10928-022-09813-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sharifsepideh exploringinductivelinearizationforsimulationandestimationwithanapplicationtothemichaelismentenmodel
AT hasegawachihiro exploringinductivelinearizationforsimulationandestimationwithanapplicationtothemichaelismentenmodel
AT duffullstephenb exploringinductivelinearizationforsimulationandestimationwithanapplicationtothemichaelismentenmodel