Cargando…
Verification of the effect of acquisition time for SwiftScan on quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography using an anthropomorphic phantom
BACKGROUND: SwiftScan single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a recently released scanning technique with data acquired when the detector is stationary and when it moves from one view to the next. The influence of scan time for using SwiftScan on quantitative bone SPECT remains unclear...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00477-9 |
_version_ | 1784760094217469952 |
---|---|
author | Shiiba, Takuro Sekikawa, Yuya Tateoka, Shinji Shinohara, Nobutaka Inoue, Yuuki Kuroiwa, Yasuyoshi Tanaka, Takashi Kihara, Yasushi Imamura, Takuroh |
author_facet | Shiiba, Takuro Sekikawa, Yuya Tateoka, Shinji Shinohara, Nobutaka Inoue, Yuuki Kuroiwa, Yasuyoshi Tanaka, Takashi Kihara, Yasushi Imamura, Takuroh |
author_sort | Shiiba, Takuro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: SwiftScan single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a recently released scanning technique with data acquired when the detector is stationary and when it moves from one view to the next. The influence of scan time for using SwiftScan on quantitative bone SPECT remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the effect of the scan time for SwiftScan SPECT on the image quality and quantification of bone SPECT compared to step and shoot mode (SSM) using (99m)Tc-filled anthropomorphic phantom (SIM(2) bone phantom). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phantom SPECT/computed tomography (CT) images were acquired using Discovery NM/CT 860 (GE Healthcare) with a low-energy high-resolution sensitivity collimator. We used the fixed parameters (subsets 10 and iterations 5) for reconstruction. The coefficient of variation (CV), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), full width at half maximum (FWHM), and quantitative value of SwiftScan SPECT and SSM were compared at various acquisition times (5, 7, 17, and 32 min). RESULTS: In the short-time scan (< 7 min), the CV and CNR of SwiftScan SPECT were better than those of SSM, whereas in the longtime scan (> 17 min), the CV and CNR of SwiftScan SPECT were similar to those of SSM. The FWHMs for SwiftScan SPECT (13.6–14.8 mm) and SSM (13.5–14.4 mm) were similar. The mean absolute errors of quantitative values at 5, 7, 17, and 32 min were 38.8, 38.4, 48.8, and 48.1, respectively, for SwiftScan SPECT and 41.8, 40.8%, 47.2, and 49.8, respectively, for SSM. CONCLUSIONS: SwiftScan on quantitative bone SPECT provides improved image quality in the short-time scan with quantification similar to or better than SSM. Therefore, in clinical settings, using SwiftScan SPECT instead of the SSM scan protocol in the short-time scan might provide higher-quality diagnostic images than SSM. Our results could provide vital information on the use of SwiftScan SPECT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9339048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93390482022-08-01 Verification of the effect of acquisition time for SwiftScan on quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography using an anthropomorphic phantom Shiiba, Takuro Sekikawa, Yuya Tateoka, Shinji Shinohara, Nobutaka Inoue, Yuuki Kuroiwa, Yasuyoshi Tanaka, Takashi Kihara, Yasushi Imamura, Takuroh EJNMMI Phys Short Communication BACKGROUND: SwiftScan single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a recently released scanning technique with data acquired when the detector is stationary and when it moves from one view to the next. The influence of scan time for using SwiftScan on quantitative bone SPECT remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the effect of the scan time for SwiftScan SPECT on the image quality and quantification of bone SPECT compared to step and shoot mode (SSM) using (99m)Tc-filled anthropomorphic phantom (SIM(2) bone phantom). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phantom SPECT/computed tomography (CT) images were acquired using Discovery NM/CT 860 (GE Healthcare) with a low-energy high-resolution sensitivity collimator. We used the fixed parameters (subsets 10 and iterations 5) for reconstruction. The coefficient of variation (CV), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), full width at half maximum (FWHM), and quantitative value of SwiftScan SPECT and SSM were compared at various acquisition times (5, 7, 17, and 32 min). RESULTS: In the short-time scan (< 7 min), the CV and CNR of SwiftScan SPECT were better than those of SSM, whereas in the longtime scan (> 17 min), the CV and CNR of SwiftScan SPECT were similar to those of SSM. The FWHMs for SwiftScan SPECT (13.6–14.8 mm) and SSM (13.5–14.4 mm) were similar. The mean absolute errors of quantitative values at 5, 7, 17, and 32 min were 38.8, 38.4, 48.8, and 48.1, respectively, for SwiftScan SPECT and 41.8, 40.8%, 47.2, and 49.8, respectively, for SSM. CONCLUSIONS: SwiftScan on quantitative bone SPECT provides improved image quality in the short-time scan with quantification similar to or better than SSM. Therefore, in clinical settings, using SwiftScan SPECT instead of the SSM scan protocol in the short-time scan might provide higher-quality diagnostic images than SSM. Our results could provide vital information on the use of SwiftScan SPECT. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9339048/ /pubmed/35907090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00477-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Shiiba, Takuro Sekikawa, Yuya Tateoka, Shinji Shinohara, Nobutaka Inoue, Yuuki Kuroiwa, Yasuyoshi Tanaka, Takashi Kihara, Yasushi Imamura, Takuroh Verification of the effect of acquisition time for SwiftScan on quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography using an anthropomorphic phantom |
title | Verification of the effect of acquisition time for SwiftScan on quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography using an anthropomorphic phantom |
title_full | Verification of the effect of acquisition time for SwiftScan on quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography using an anthropomorphic phantom |
title_fullStr | Verification of the effect of acquisition time for SwiftScan on quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography using an anthropomorphic phantom |
title_full_unstemmed | Verification of the effect of acquisition time for SwiftScan on quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography using an anthropomorphic phantom |
title_short | Verification of the effect of acquisition time for SwiftScan on quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography using an anthropomorphic phantom |
title_sort | verification of the effect of acquisition time for swiftscan on quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography using an anthropomorphic phantom |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00477-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shiibatakuro verificationoftheeffectofacquisitiontimeforswiftscanonquantitativebonesinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyusingananthropomorphicphantom AT sekikawayuya verificationoftheeffectofacquisitiontimeforswiftscanonquantitativebonesinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyusingananthropomorphicphantom AT tateokashinji verificationoftheeffectofacquisitiontimeforswiftscanonquantitativebonesinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyusingananthropomorphicphantom AT shinoharanobutaka verificationoftheeffectofacquisitiontimeforswiftscanonquantitativebonesinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyusingananthropomorphicphantom AT inoueyuuki verificationoftheeffectofacquisitiontimeforswiftscanonquantitativebonesinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyusingananthropomorphicphantom AT kuroiwayasuyoshi verificationoftheeffectofacquisitiontimeforswiftscanonquantitativebonesinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyusingananthropomorphicphantom AT tanakatakashi verificationoftheeffectofacquisitiontimeforswiftscanonquantitativebonesinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyusingananthropomorphicphantom AT kiharayasushi verificationoftheeffectofacquisitiontimeforswiftscanonquantitativebonesinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyusingananthropomorphicphantom AT imamuratakuroh verificationoftheeffectofacquisitiontimeforswiftscanonquantitativebonesinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyusingananthropomorphicphantom |