Cargando…
Different routes to liking: how readers arrive at narrative evaluations
When two people read the same story, they might both end up liking it very much. However, this does not necessarily mean that their reasons for liking it were identical. We therefore ask what factors contribute to “liking” a story, and—most importantly—how people vary in this respect. We found that...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00419-0 |
_version_ | 1784760096285261824 |
---|---|
author | Mak, Marloes Faber, Myrthe Willems, Roel M. |
author_facet | Mak, Marloes Faber, Myrthe Willems, Roel M. |
author_sort | Mak, Marloes |
collection | PubMed |
description | When two people read the same story, they might both end up liking it very much. However, this does not necessarily mean that their reasons for liking it were identical. We therefore ask what factors contribute to “liking” a story, and—most importantly—how people vary in this respect. We found that readers like stories because they find them interesting, amusing, suspenseful and/or beautiful. However, the degree to which these components of appreciation were related to how much readers liked stories differed between individuals. Interestingly, the individual slopes of the relationships between many of the components and liking were (positively or negatively) correlated. This indicated, for instance, that individuals displaying a relatively strong relationship between interest and liking, generally display a relatively weak relationship between sadness and liking. The individual differences in the strengths of the relationships between the components and liking were not related to individual differences in expertize, a characteristic strongly associated with aesthetic appreciation of visual art. Our work illustrates that it is important to take into consideration the fact that individuals differ in how they arrive at their evaluation of literary stories, and that it is possible to quantify these differences in empirical experiments. Our work suggests that future research should be careful about “overfitting” theories of aesthetic appreciation to an “idealized reader,” but rather take into consideration variations across individuals in the reason for liking a particular story. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41235-022-00419-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9339064 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93390642022-08-01 Different routes to liking: how readers arrive at narrative evaluations Mak, Marloes Faber, Myrthe Willems, Roel M. Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article When two people read the same story, they might both end up liking it very much. However, this does not necessarily mean that their reasons for liking it were identical. We therefore ask what factors contribute to “liking” a story, and—most importantly—how people vary in this respect. We found that readers like stories because they find them interesting, amusing, suspenseful and/or beautiful. However, the degree to which these components of appreciation were related to how much readers liked stories differed between individuals. Interestingly, the individual slopes of the relationships between many of the components and liking were (positively or negatively) correlated. This indicated, for instance, that individuals displaying a relatively strong relationship between interest and liking, generally display a relatively weak relationship between sadness and liking. The individual differences in the strengths of the relationships between the components and liking were not related to individual differences in expertize, a characteristic strongly associated with aesthetic appreciation of visual art. Our work illustrates that it is important to take into consideration the fact that individuals differ in how they arrive at their evaluation of literary stories, and that it is possible to quantify these differences in empirical experiments. Our work suggests that future research should be careful about “overfitting” theories of aesthetic appreciation to an “idealized reader,” but rather take into consideration variations across individuals in the reason for liking a particular story. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41235-022-00419-0. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9339064/ /pubmed/35907147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00419-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mak, Marloes Faber, Myrthe Willems, Roel M. Different routes to liking: how readers arrive at narrative evaluations |
title | Different routes to liking: how readers arrive at narrative evaluations |
title_full | Different routes to liking: how readers arrive at narrative evaluations |
title_fullStr | Different routes to liking: how readers arrive at narrative evaluations |
title_full_unstemmed | Different routes to liking: how readers arrive at narrative evaluations |
title_short | Different routes to liking: how readers arrive at narrative evaluations |
title_sort | different routes to liking: how readers arrive at narrative evaluations |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00419-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT makmarloes differentroutestolikinghowreadersarriveatnarrativeevaluations AT fabermyrthe differentroutestolikinghowreadersarriveatnarrativeevaluations AT willemsroelm differentroutestolikinghowreadersarriveatnarrativeevaluations |