Cargando…

Feasibility of positron range correction in 82-Rubidium cardiac PET/CT

BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using positron emission tomography (PET) tracers is an essential tool in investigating diseases and treatment responses in cardiology. (82)Rubidium ((82)Rb)-PET imaging is advantageous for MPI due to its short half-life, but cannot be used for small ani...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jensen, Malte, Bentsen, Simon, Clemmensen, Andreas, Jensen, Jacob Kildevang, Madsen, Johanne, Rossing, Jonas, Laier, Anna, Hasbak, Philip, Kjaer, Andreas, Ripa, Rasmus Sejersten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00480-0
_version_ 1784760096511754240
author Jensen, Malte
Bentsen, Simon
Clemmensen, Andreas
Jensen, Jacob Kildevang
Madsen, Johanne
Rossing, Jonas
Laier, Anna
Hasbak, Philip
Kjaer, Andreas
Ripa, Rasmus Sejersten
author_facet Jensen, Malte
Bentsen, Simon
Clemmensen, Andreas
Jensen, Jacob Kildevang
Madsen, Johanne
Rossing, Jonas
Laier, Anna
Hasbak, Philip
Kjaer, Andreas
Ripa, Rasmus Sejersten
author_sort Jensen, Malte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using positron emission tomography (PET) tracers is an essential tool in investigating diseases and treatment responses in cardiology. (82)Rubidium ((82)Rb)-PET imaging is advantageous for MPI due to its short half-life, but cannot be used for small animal research due to the long positron range. We aimed to correct for this, enabling MPI with (82)Rb-PET in rats. METHODS: The effect of positron range correction (PRC) on (82)Rb-PET was examined using two phantoms and in vivo on rats. A NEMA NU-4-inspired phantom was used for image quality evaluation (%standard deviation (%SD), spillover ratio (SOR) and recovery coefficient (RC)). A cardiac phantom was used for assessing spatial resolution. Two rats underwent rest (82)Rb-PET to optimize number of iterations, type of PRC and respiratory gating. RESULTS: NEMA NU-4 metrics (no PRC vs PRC): %SD 0.087 versus 0.103; SOR (air) 0.022 versus 0.002, SOR (water) 0.059 versus 0.019; RC (3 mm) 0.219 versus 0.584, RC (4 mm) 0.300 versus 0.874, RC (5 mm) 0.357 versus 1.197. Cardiac phantom full width at half maximum (FWHM) and full width at tenth maximum (FWTM) (no PRC vs. PRC): FWTM 6.73 mm versus 3.26 mm (true: 3 mm), FWTM 9.27 mm versus 7.01 mm. The in vivo scans with respiratory gating had a homogeneous myocardium clearly distinguishable from the blood pool. CONCLUSION: PRC improved the spatial resolution for the phantoms and in vivo at the expense of slightly more noise. Combined with respiratory gating, the spatial resolution achieved using PRC should allow for quantitative MPI in small animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9339065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93390652022-08-01 Feasibility of positron range correction in 82-Rubidium cardiac PET/CT Jensen, Malte Bentsen, Simon Clemmensen, Andreas Jensen, Jacob Kildevang Madsen, Johanne Rossing, Jonas Laier, Anna Hasbak, Philip Kjaer, Andreas Ripa, Rasmus Sejersten EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using positron emission tomography (PET) tracers is an essential tool in investigating diseases and treatment responses in cardiology. (82)Rubidium ((82)Rb)-PET imaging is advantageous for MPI due to its short half-life, but cannot be used for small animal research due to the long positron range. We aimed to correct for this, enabling MPI with (82)Rb-PET in rats. METHODS: The effect of positron range correction (PRC) on (82)Rb-PET was examined using two phantoms and in vivo on rats. A NEMA NU-4-inspired phantom was used for image quality evaluation (%standard deviation (%SD), spillover ratio (SOR) and recovery coefficient (RC)). A cardiac phantom was used for assessing spatial resolution. Two rats underwent rest (82)Rb-PET to optimize number of iterations, type of PRC and respiratory gating. RESULTS: NEMA NU-4 metrics (no PRC vs PRC): %SD 0.087 versus 0.103; SOR (air) 0.022 versus 0.002, SOR (water) 0.059 versus 0.019; RC (3 mm) 0.219 versus 0.584, RC (4 mm) 0.300 versus 0.874, RC (5 mm) 0.357 versus 1.197. Cardiac phantom full width at half maximum (FWHM) and full width at tenth maximum (FWTM) (no PRC vs. PRC): FWTM 6.73 mm versus 3.26 mm (true: 3 mm), FWTM 9.27 mm versus 7.01 mm. The in vivo scans with respiratory gating had a homogeneous myocardium clearly distinguishable from the blood pool. CONCLUSION: PRC improved the spatial resolution for the phantoms and in vivo at the expense of slightly more noise. Combined with respiratory gating, the spatial resolution achieved using PRC should allow for quantitative MPI in small animals. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9339065/ /pubmed/35907082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00480-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Jensen, Malte
Bentsen, Simon
Clemmensen, Andreas
Jensen, Jacob Kildevang
Madsen, Johanne
Rossing, Jonas
Laier, Anna
Hasbak, Philip
Kjaer, Andreas
Ripa, Rasmus Sejersten
Feasibility of positron range correction in 82-Rubidium cardiac PET/CT
title Feasibility of positron range correction in 82-Rubidium cardiac PET/CT
title_full Feasibility of positron range correction in 82-Rubidium cardiac PET/CT
title_fullStr Feasibility of positron range correction in 82-Rubidium cardiac PET/CT
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of positron range correction in 82-Rubidium cardiac PET/CT
title_short Feasibility of positron range correction in 82-Rubidium cardiac PET/CT
title_sort feasibility of positron range correction in 82-rubidium cardiac pet/ct
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35907082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00480-0
work_keys_str_mv AT jensenmalte feasibilityofpositronrangecorrectionin82rubidiumcardiacpetct
AT bentsensimon feasibilityofpositronrangecorrectionin82rubidiumcardiacpetct
AT clemmensenandreas feasibilityofpositronrangecorrectionin82rubidiumcardiacpetct
AT jensenjacobkildevang feasibilityofpositronrangecorrectionin82rubidiumcardiacpetct
AT madsenjohanne feasibilityofpositronrangecorrectionin82rubidiumcardiacpetct
AT rossingjonas feasibilityofpositronrangecorrectionin82rubidiumcardiacpetct
AT laieranna feasibilityofpositronrangecorrectionin82rubidiumcardiacpetct
AT hasbakphilip feasibilityofpositronrangecorrectionin82rubidiumcardiacpetct
AT kjaerandreas feasibilityofpositronrangecorrectionin82rubidiumcardiacpetct
AT riparasmussejersten feasibilityofpositronrangecorrectionin82rubidiumcardiacpetct