Cargando…
A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Background: Current treatment options of acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL) include chemotherapy alone or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) following induction chemotherapy both along with CNS prophylaxis. The usual and standard induction regimens currently administered could have severe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975121 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijhoscr.v16i1.8439 |
_version_ | 1784760122631782400 |
---|---|
author | Vaezi, Mohammad Pourkhani, Amirhoushang Kasaeian, Amir Souri, Maryam Yaghmaie, Marjan Chardouli, Bahram Alimoghaddam, Kamran Ghavamzadeh, Ardeshir |
author_facet | Vaezi, Mohammad Pourkhani, Amirhoushang Kasaeian, Amir Souri, Maryam Yaghmaie, Marjan Chardouli, Bahram Alimoghaddam, Kamran Ghavamzadeh, Ardeshir |
author_sort | Vaezi, Mohammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Current treatment options of acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL) include chemotherapy alone or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) following induction chemotherapy both along with CNS prophylaxis. The usual and standard induction regimens currently administered could have severe complications and mortality. Materials and Methods: To lessen induction regimen complications in ALL patients who undergo HSCT, we used a cytoreduction induction regimen including dexamethasone (8 mg, IV, three times a day, for 28 days) and vincristine(1.4 mg/m(2), IV, on days 1,8,15 and 22) for 49 newly diagnosed adult ALL patients followed by an early sibling donor HSCT within two months. The results were matched with outcomes of HSCT in 172 ALL patients inducted by standard induction regimen. Results: Median follow-up time was 5.41 years in the standard group and 5.27 years in the other. All patients of the case group (100%) achieved complete remission. Landmark analyses were performed to scrutinize the effect of treatments on different time intervals: first two years and 2(nd) to end years. Type of treatment had no significant effect on the hazard of death in the first landmark (HR=0.87, P=0.64). Cytoreduction regimen amplified the hazard of death 3.43 times more than the standard regimen in the second landmark (HR=3.43 P=0.035). Multivariate analysis showed that the cytoreduction regimen reduced the hazard of relapse about 22%, but not statistically significant (HR=0.78, P-value=0.24). Conclusion: Overall, it seems despite achieving complete remission in induction therapy, depth of response is a critical predictor for long-term outcomes of HSCT in ALL patients, and the use of multiple agents may be necessary to decrease tumor cell burden and minimal residual disease(MRD). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9339120 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93391202022-08-15 A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Vaezi, Mohammad Pourkhani, Amirhoushang Kasaeian, Amir Souri, Maryam Yaghmaie, Marjan Chardouli, Bahram Alimoghaddam, Kamran Ghavamzadeh, Ardeshir Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res Original Article Background: Current treatment options of acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL) include chemotherapy alone or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) following induction chemotherapy both along with CNS prophylaxis. The usual and standard induction regimens currently administered could have severe complications and mortality. Materials and Methods: To lessen induction regimen complications in ALL patients who undergo HSCT, we used a cytoreduction induction regimen including dexamethasone (8 mg, IV, three times a day, for 28 days) and vincristine(1.4 mg/m(2), IV, on days 1,8,15 and 22) for 49 newly diagnosed adult ALL patients followed by an early sibling donor HSCT within two months. The results were matched with outcomes of HSCT in 172 ALL patients inducted by standard induction regimen. Results: Median follow-up time was 5.41 years in the standard group and 5.27 years in the other. All patients of the case group (100%) achieved complete remission. Landmark analyses were performed to scrutinize the effect of treatments on different time intervals: first two years and 2(nd) to end years. Type of treatment had no significant effect on the hazard of death in the first landmark (HR=0.87, P=0.64). Cytoreduction regimen amplified the hazard of death 3.43 times more than the standard regimen in the second landmark (HR=3.43 P=0.035). Multivariate analysis showed that the cytoreduction regimen reduced the hazard of relapse about 22%, but not statistically significant (HR=0.78, P-value=0.24). Conclusion: Overall, it seems despite achieving complete remission in induction therapy, depth of response is a critical predictor for long-term outcomes of HSCT in ALL patients, and the use of multiple agents may be necessary to decrease tumor cell burden and minimal residual disease(MRD). Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center 2022-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9339120/ /pubmed/35975121 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijhoscr.v16i1.8439 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tehran University of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Vaezi, Mohammad Pourkhani, Amirhoushang Kasaeian, Amir Souri, Maryam Yaghmaie, Marjan Chardouli, Bahram Alimoghaddam, Kamran Ghavamzadeh, Ardeshir A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation |
title | A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation |
title_full | A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation |
title_short | A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation |
title_sort | comparison of dexamethasone plus vincristine versus standard regimen in induction therapy of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975121 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijhoscr.v16i1.8439 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaezimohammad acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT pourkhaniamirhoushang acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT kasaeianamir acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT sourimaryam acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT yaghmaiemarjan acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT chardoulibahram acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT alimoghaddamkamran acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT ghavamzadehardeshir acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT vaezimohammad comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT pourkhaniamirhoushang comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT kasaeianamir comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT sourimaryam comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT yaghmaiemarjan comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT chardoulibahram comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT alimoghaddamkamran comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT ghavamzadehardeshir comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation |