Cargando…

A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background: Current treatment options of acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL) include chemotherapy alone or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) following induction chemotherapy both along with CNS prophylaxis. The usual and standard induction regimens currently administered could have severe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaezi, Mohammad, Pourkhani, Amirhoushang, Kasaeian, Amir, Souri, Maryam, Yaghmaie, Marjan, Chardouli, Bahram, Alimoghaddam, Kamran, Ghavamzadeh, Ardeshir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975121
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijhoscr.v16i1.8439
_version_ 1784760122631782400
author Vaezi, Mohammad
Pourkhani, Amirhoushang
Kasaeian, Amir
Souri, Maryam
Yaghmaie, Marjan
Chardouli, Bahram
Alimoghaddam, Kamran
Ghavamzadeh, Ardeshir
author_facet Vaezi, Mohammad
Pourkhani, Amirhoushang
Kasaeian, Amir
Souri, Maryam
Yaghmaie, Marjan
Chardouli, Bahram
Alimoghaddam, Kamran
Ghavamzadeh, Ardeshir
author_sort Vaezi, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description Background: Current treatment options of acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL) include chemotherapy alone or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) following induction chemotherapy both along with CNS prophylaxis. The usual and standard induction regimens currently administered could have severe complications and mortality. Materials and Methods: To lessen induction regimen complications in ALL patients who undergo HSCT, we used a cytoreduction induction regimen including dexamethasone (8 mg, IV, three times a day, for 28 days) and vincristine(1.4 mg/m(2), IV, on days 1,8,15 and 22) for 49 newly diagnosed adult ALL patients followed by an early sibling donor HSCT within two months. The results were matched with outcomes of HSCT in 172 ALL patients inducted by standard induction regimen. Results: Median follow-up time was 5.41 years in the standard group and 5.27 years in the other. All patients of the case group (100%) achieved complete remission. Landmark analyses were performed to scrutinize the effect of treatments on different time intervals: first two years and 2(nd) to end years. Type of treatment had no significant effect on the hazard of death in the first landmark (HR=0.87, P=0.64). Cytoreduction regimen amplified the hazard of death 3.43 times more than the standard regimen in the second landmark (HR=3.43 P=0.035). Multivariate analysis showed that the cytoreduction regimen reduced the hazard of relapse about 22%, but not statistically significant (HR=0.78, P-value=0.24). Conclusion: Overall, it seems despite achieving complete remission in induction therapy, depth of response is a critical predictor for long-term outcomes of HSCT in ALL patients, and the use of multiple agents may be necessary to decrease tumor cell burden and minimal residual disease(MRD).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9339120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93391202022-08-15 A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Vaezi, Mohammad Pourkhani, Amirhoushang Kasaeian, Amir Souri, Maryam Yaghmaie, Marjan Chardouli, Bahram Alimoghaddam, Kamran Ghavamzadeh, Ardeshir Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res Original Article Background: Current treatment options of acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL) include chemotherapy alone or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) following induction chemotherapy both along with CNS prophylaxis. The usual and standard induction regimens currently administered could have severe complications and mortality. Materials and Methods: To lessen induction regimen complications in ALL patients who undergo HSCT, we used a cytoreduction induction regimen including dexamethasone (8 mg, IV, three times a day, for 28 days) and vincristine(1.4 mg/m(2), IV, on days 1,8,15 and 22) for 49 newly diagnosed adult ALL patients followed by an early sibling donor HSCT within two months. The results were matched with outcomes of HSCT in 172 ALL patients inducted by standard induction regimen. Results: Median follow-up time was 5.41 years in the standard group and 5.27 years in the other. All patients of the case group (100%) achieved complete remission. Landmark analyses were performed to scrutinize the effect of treatments on different time intervals: first two years and 2(nd) to end years. Type of treatment had no significant effect on the hazard of death in the first landmark (HR=0.87, P=0.64). Cytoreduction regimen amplified the hazard of death 3.43 times more than the standard regimen in the second landmark (HR=3.43 P=0.035). Multivariate analysis showed that the cytoreduction regimen reduced the hazard of relapse about 22%, but not statistically significant (HR=0.78, P-value=0.24). Conclusion: Overall, it seems despite achieving complete remission in induction therapy, depth of response is a critical predictor for long-term outcomes of HSCT in ALL patients, and the use of multiple agents may be necessary to decrease tumor cell burden and minimal residual disease(MRD). Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center 2022-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9339120/ /pubmed/35975121 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijhoscr.v16i1.8439 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tehran University of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vaezi, Mohammad
Pourkhani, Amirhoushang
Kasaeian, Amir
Souri, Maryam
Yaghmaie, Marjan
Chardouli, Bahram
Alimoghaddam, Kamran
Ghavamzadeh, Ardeshir
A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
title A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
title_full A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
title_fullStr A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
title_short A Comparison of Dexamethasone Plus Vincristine versus Standard Regimen in Induction Therapy of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
title_sort comparison of dexamethasone plus vincristine versus standard regimen in induction therapy of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975121
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijhoscr.v16i1.8439
work_keys_str_mv AT vaezimohammad acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT pourkhaniamirhoushang acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT kasaeianamir acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT sourimaryam acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT yaghmaiemarjan acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT chardoulibahram acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT alimoghaddamkamran acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT ghavamzadehardeshir acomparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT vaezimohammad comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT pourkhaniamirhoushang comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT kasaeianamir comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT sourimaryam comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT yaghmaiemarjan comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT chardoulibahram comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT alimoghaddamkamran comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT ghavamzadehardeshir comparisonofdexamethasoneplusvincristineversusstandardregimenininductiontherapyofadultacutelymphoblasticleukemiapatientsundergoinghematopoieticstemcelltransplantation