Cargando…
Use of transcriptomics in hazard identification and next generation risk assessment: A case study with clothianidin
Toxicological risk assessment is essential in the evaluation and authorization of different classes of chemical substances. Genotoxicity and mutagenicity testing are of highest priority and rely on established in vitro systems with bacterial and mammalian cells, sometimes followed by in vivo testing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35690182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2022.113212 |
_version_ | 1784760217456607232 |
---|---|
author | Sprenger, Heike Kreuzer, Katrin Alarcan, Jimmy Herrmann, Kristin Buchmüller, Julia Marx-Stoelting, Philip Braeuning, Albert |
author_facet | Sprenger, Heike Kreuzer, Katrin Alarcan, Jimmy Herrmann, Kristin Buchmüller, Julia Marx-Stoelting, Philip Braeuning, Albert |
author_sort | Sprenger, Heike |
collection | PubMed |
description | Toxicological risk assessment is essential in the evaluation and authorization of different classes of chemical substances. Genotoxicity and mutagenicity testing are of highest priority and rely on established in vitro systems with bacterial and mammalian cells, sometimes followed by in vivo testing using rodent animal models. Transcriptomic approaches have recently also shown their value to determine transcript signatures specific for genotoxicity. Here, we studied how transcriptomic data, in combination with in vitro tests with human cells, can be used for the identification of genotoxic properties of test compounds. To this end, we used liver samples from a 28-day oral toxicity study in rats with the pesticidal active substances imazalil, thiacloprid, and clothianidin, a neonicotinoid-type insecticide with, amongst others, known hepatotoxic properties. Transcriptomic results were bioinformatically evaluated and pointed towards a genotoxic potential of clothianidin. In vitro Comet and γH2AX assays in human HepaRG hepatoma cells, complemented by in silico analyses of mutagenicity, were conducted as follow-up experiments to check if the genotoxicity alert from the transcriptomic study is in line with results from a battery of guideline genotoxicity studies. Our results illustrate the combined use of toxicogenomics, classic toxicological data and new approach methods in risk assessment. By means of a weight-of-evidence decision, we conclude that clothianidin does most likely not pose genotoxic risks to humans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9339662 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Science Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93396622022-08-03 Use of transcriptomics in hazard identification and next generation risk assessment: A case study with clothianidin Sprenger, Heike Kreuzer, Katrin Alarcan, Jimmy Herrmann, Kristin Buchmüller, Julia Marx-Stoelting, Philip Braeuning, Albert Food Chem Toxicol Article Toxicological risk assessment is essential in the evaluation and authorization of different classes of chemical substances. Genotoxicity and mutagenicity testing are of highest priority and rely on established in vitro systems with bacterial and mammalian cells, sometimes followed by in vivo testing using rodent animal models. Transcriptomic approaches have recently also shown their value to determine transcript signatures specific for genotoxicity. Here, we studied how transcriptomic data, in combination with in vitro tests with human cells, can be used for the identification of genotoxic properties of test compounds. To this end, we used liver samples from a 28-day oral toxicity study in rats with the pesticidal active substances imazalil, thiacloprid, and clothianidin, a neonicotinoid-type insecticide with, amongst others, known hepatotoxic properties. Transcriptomic results were bioinformatically evaluated and pointed towards a genotoxic potential of clothianidin. In vitro Comet and γH2AX assays in human HepaRG hepatoma cells, complemented by in silico analyses of mutagenicity, were conducted as follow-up experiments to check if the genotoxicity alert from the transcriptomic study is in line with results from a battery of guideline genotoxicity studies. Our results illustrate the combined use of toxicogenomics, classic toxicological data and new approach methods in risk assessment. By means of a weight-of-evidence decision, we conclude that clothianidin does most likely not pose genotoxic risks to humans. Elsevier Science Ltd 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9339662/ /pubmed/35690182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2022.113212 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sprenger, Heike Kreuzer, Katrin Alarcan, Jimmy Herrmann, Kristin Buchmüller, Julia Marx-Stoelting, Philip Braeuning, Albert Use of transcriptomics in hazard identification and next generation risk assessment: A case study with clothianidin |
title | Use of transcriptomics in hazard identification and next generation risk assessment: A case study with clothianidin |
title_full | Use of transcriptomics in hazard identification and next generation risk assessment: A case study with clothianidin |
title_fullStr | Use of transcriptomics in hazard identification and next generation risk assessment: A case study with clothianidin |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of transcriptomics in hazard identification and next generation risk assessment: A case study with clothianidin |
title_short | Use of transcriptomics in hazard identification and next generation risk assessment: A case study with clothianidin |
title_sort | use of transcriptomics in hazard identification and next generation risk assessment: a case study with clothianidin |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35690182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2022.113212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sprengerheike useoftranscriptomicsinhazardidentificationandnextgenerationriskassessmentacasestudywithclothianidin AT kreuzerkatrin useoftranscriptomicsinhazardidentificationandnextgenerationriskassessmentacasestudywithclothianidin AT alarcanjimmy useoftranscriptomicsinhazardidentificationandnextgenerationriskassessmentacasestudywithclothianidin AT herrmannkristin useoftranscriptomicsinhazardidentificationandnextgenerationriskassessmentacasestudywithclothianidin AT buchmullerjulia useoftranscriptomicsinhazardidentificationandnextgenerationriskassessmentacasestudywithclothianidin AT marxstoeltingphilip useoftranscriptomicsinhazardidentificationandnextgenerationriskassessmentacasestudywithclothianidin AT braeuningalbert useoftranscriptomicsinhazardidentificationandnextgenerationriskassessmentacasestudywithclothianidin |