Cargando…

A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of automated fundus screening software in detecting eye diseases by comparing the reported results against those given by human experts. RESULTS: There were 1585 subjects who completed the procedure and yielded qualified images. The prevalence of referable diab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Fei, Pan, Jianying, Yang, Dalu, Wu, Junde, Ou, Yiling, Li, Huiting, Huang, Jiamin, Xie, Huirui, Ou, Dongmei, Wu, Xiaoyi, Wu, Binghong, Sun, Qinpei, Fang, Huihui, Yang, Yehui, Xu, Yanwu, Luo, Yan, Zhang, Xiulan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35881410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.7.22
_version_ 1784760224620478464
author Li, Fei
Pan, Jianying
Yang, Dalu
Wu, Junde
Ou, Yiling
Li, Huiting
Huang, Jiamin
Xie, Huirui
Ou, Dongmei
Wu, Xiaoyi
Wu, Binghong
Sun, Qinpei
Fang, Huihui
Yang, Yehui
Xu, Yanwu
Luo, Yan
Zhang, Xiulan
author_facet Li, Fei
Pan, Jianying
Yang, Dalu
Wu, Junde
Ou, Yiling
Li, Huiting
Huang, Jiamin
Xie, Huirui
Ou, Dongmei
Wu, Xiaoyi
Wu, Binghong
Sun, Qinpei
Fang, Huihui
Yang, Yehui
Xu, Yanwu
Luo, Yan
Zhang, Xiulan
author_sort Li, Fei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of automated fundus screening software in detecting eye diseases by comparing the reported results against those given by human experts. RESULTS: There were 1585 subjects who completed the procedure and yielded qualified images. The prevalence of referable diabetic retinopathy (RDR), glaucoma suspect (GCS), and referable macular diseases (RMD) were 20.4%, 23.2%, and 49.0%, respectively. The overall sensitivity values for RDR, GCS, and RMD diagnosis are 0.948 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.918–0.967), 0.891 (95% CI, 0.855–0.919), and 0.901 (95% CI–0.878, 0.920), respectively. The overall specificity values for RDR, GCS, and RMD diagnosis are 0.954 (95% CI, 0.915–0.965), 0.993 (95% CI–0.986, 0.996), and 0.955 (95% CI–0.939, 0.968), respectively. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 1743 subjects at seven hospitals throughout China. At each hospital, an operator records the subjects' information, takes fundus images, and submits the images to the Image Reading Center of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University (IRC). The IRC grades the images according to the study protocol. Meanwhile, these images will also be automatically screened by the artificial intelligence algorithm. Then, the analysis results of automated screening algorithm are compared against the grading results of IRC. The end point goals are lower bounds of 95% CI of sensitivity values that are greater than 0.85 for all three target diseases, and lower bounds of 95% CI of specificity values that are greater than 0.90 for RDR and 0.85 for GCS and RMD. CONCLUSIONS: Automated fundus screening software demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity in detecting RDR, GCS, and RMD from color fundus imaged captured using various cameras. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that automated software can improve the screening effectiveness for eye diseases, especially in a primary care context, where experienced ophthalmologists are scarce.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9339691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93396912022-08-02 A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm Li, Fei Pan, Jianying Yang, Dalu Wu, Junde Ou, Yiling Li, Huiting Huang, Jiamin Xie, Huirui Ou, Dongmei Wu, Xiaoyi Wu, Binghong Sun, Qinpei Fang, Huihui Yang, Yehui Xu, Yanwu Luo, Yan Zhang, Xiulan Transl Vis Sci Technol Artificial Intelligence PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of automated fundus screening software in detecting eye diseases by comparing the reported results against those given by human experts. RESULTS: There were 1585 subjects who completed the procedure and yielded qualified images. The prevalence of referable diabetic retinopathy (RDR), glaucoma suspect (GCS), and referable macular diseases (RMD) were 20.4%, 23.2%, and 49.0%, respectively. The overall sensitivity values for RDR, GCS, and RMD diagnosis are 0.948 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.918–0.967), 0.891 (95% CI, 0.855–0.919), and 0.901 (95% CI–0.878, 0.920), respectively. The overall specificity values for RDR, GCS, and RMD diagnosis are 0.954 (95% CI, 0.915–0.965), 0.993 (95% CI–0.986, 0.996), and 0.955 (95% CI–0.939, 0.968), respectively. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 1743 subjects at seven hospitals throughout China. At each hospital, an operator records the subjects' information, takes fundus images, and submits the images to the Image Reading Center of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University (IRC). The IRC grades the images according to the study protocol. Meanwhile, these images will also be automatically screened by the artificial intelligence algorithm. Then, the analysis results of automated screening algorithm are compared against the grading results of IRC. The end point goals are lower bounds of 95% CI of sensitivity values that are greater than 0.85 for all three target diseases, and lower bounds of 95% CI of specificity values that are greater than 0.90 for RDR and 0.85 for GCS and RMD. CONCLUSIONS: Automated fundus screening software demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity in detecting RDR, GCS, and RMD from color fundus imaged captured using various cameras. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that automated software can improve the screening effectiveness for eye diseases, especially in a primary care context, where experienced ophthalmologists are scarce. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9339691/ /pubmed/35881410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.7.22 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Artificial Intelligence
Li, Fei
Pan, Jianying
Yang, Dalu
Wu, Junde
Ou, Yiling
Li, Huiting
Huang, Jiamin
Xie, Huirui
Ou, Dongmei
Wu, Xiaoyi
Wu, Binghong
Sun, Qinpei
Fang, Huihui
Yang, Yehui
Xu, Yanwu
Luo, Yan
Zhang, Xiulan
A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm
title A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm
title_full A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm
title_fullStr A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm
title_full_unstemmed A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm
title_short A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm
title_sort multicenter clinical study of the automated fundus screening algorithm
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35881410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.7.22
work_keys_str_mv AT lifei amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT panjianying amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT yangdalu amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT wujunde amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT ouyiling amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT lihuiting amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT huangjiamin amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT xiehuirui amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT oudongmei amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT wuxiaoyi amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT wubinghong amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT sunqinpei amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT fanghuihui amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT yangyehui amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT xuyanwu amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT luoyan amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT zhangxiulan amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT lifei multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT panjianying multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT yangdalu multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT wujunde multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT ouyiling multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT lihuiting multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT huangjiamin multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT xiehuirui multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT oudongmei multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT wuxiaoyi multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT wubinghong multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT sunqinpei multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT fanghuihui multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT yangyehui multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT xuyanwu multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT luoyan multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm
AT zhangxiulan multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm