Cargando…
A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of automated fundus screening software in detecting eye diseases by comparing the reported results against those given by human experts. RESULTS: There were 1585 subjects who completed the procedure and yielded qualified images. The prevalence of referable diab...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35881410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.7.22 |
_version_ | 1784760224620478464 |
---|---|
author | Li, Fei Pan, Jianying Yang, Dalu Wu, Junde Ou, Yiling Li, Huiting Huang, Jiamin Xie, Huirui Ou, Dongmei Wu, Xiaoyi Wu, Binghong Sun, Qinpei Fang, Huihui Yang, Yehui Xu, Yanwu Luo, Yan Zhang, Xiulan |
author_facet | Li, Fei Pan, Jianying Yang, Dalu Wu, Junde Ou, Yiling Li, Huiting Huang, Jiamin Xie, Huirui Ou, Dongmei Wu, Xiaoyi Wu, Binghong Sun, Qinpei Fang, Huihui Yang, Yehui Xu, Yanwu Luo, Yan Zhang, Xiulan |
author_sort | Li, Fei |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of automated fundus screening software in detecting eye diseases by comparing the reported results against those given by human experts. RESULTS: There were 1585 subjects who completed the procedure and yielded qualified images. The prevalence of referable diabetic retinopathy (RDR), glaucoma suspect (GCS), and referable macular diseases (RMD) were 20.4%, 23.2%, and 49.0%, respectively. The overall sensitivity values for RDR, GCS, and RMD diagnosis are 0.948 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.918–0.967), 0.891 (95% CI, 0.855–0.919), and 0.901 (95% CI–0.878, 0.920), respectively. The overall specificity values for RDR, GCS, and RMD diagnosis are 0.954 (95% CI, 0.915–0.965), 0.993 (95% CI–0.986, 0.996), and 0.955 (95% CI–0.939, 0.968), respectively. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 1743 subjects at seven hospitals throughout China. At each hospital, an operator records the subjects' information, takes fundus images, and submits the images to the Image Reading Center of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University (IRC). The IRC grades the images according to the study protocol. Meanwhile, these images will also be automatically screened by the artificial intelligence algorithm. Then, the analysis results of automated screening algorithm are compared against the grading results of IRC. The end point goals are lower bounds of 95% CI of sensitivity values that are greater than 0.85 for all three target diseases, and lower bounds of 95% CI of specificity values that are greater than 0.90 for RDR and 0.85 for GCS and RMD. CONCLUSIONS: Automated fundus screening software demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity in detecting RDR, GCS, and RMD from color fundus imaged captured using various cameras. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that automated software can improve the screening effectiveness for eye diseases, especially in a primary care context, where experienced ophthalmologists are scarce. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9339691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93396912022-08-02 A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm Li, Fei Pan, Jianying Yang, Dalu Wu, Junde Ou, Yiling Li, Huiting Huang, Jiamin Xie, Huirui Ou, Dongmei Wu, Xiaoyi Wu, Binghong Sun, Qinpei Fang, Huihui Yang, Yehui Xu, Yanwu Luo, Yan Zhang, Xiulan Transl Vis Sci Technol Artificial Intelligence PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of automated fundus screening software in detecting eye diseases by comparing the reported results against those given by human experts. RESULTS: There were 1585 subjects who completed the procedure and yielded qualified images. The prevalence of referable diabetic retinopathy (RDR), glaucoma suspect (GCS), and referable macular diseases (RMD) were 20.4%, 23.2%, and 49.0%, respectively. The overall sensitivity values for RDR, GCS, and RMD diagnosis are 0.948 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.918–0.967), 0.891 (95% CI, 0.855–0.919), and 0.901 (95% CI–0.878, 0.920), respectively. The overall specificity values for RDR, GCS, and RMD diagnosis are 0.954 (95% CI, 0.915–0.965), 0.993 (95% CI–0.986, 0.996), and 0.955 (95% CI–0.939, 0.968), respectively. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 1743 subjects at seven hospitals throughout China. At each hospital, an operator records the subjects' information, takes fundus images, and submits the images to the Image Reading Center of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University (IRC). The IRC grades the images according to the study protocol. Meanwhile, these images will also be automatically screened by the artificial intelligence algorithm. Then, the analysis results of automated screening algorithm are compared against the grading results of IRC. The end point goals are lower bounds of 95% CI of sensitivity values that are greater than 0.85 for all three target diseases, and lower bounds of 95% CI of specificity values that are greater than 0.90 for RDR and 0.85 for GCS and RMD. CONCLUSIONS: Automated fundus screening software demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity in detecting RDR, GCS, and RMD from color fundus imaged captured using various cameras. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that automated software can improve the screening effectiveness for eye diseases, especially in a primary care context, where experienced ophthalmologists are scarce. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9339691/ /pubmed/35881410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.7.22 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Artificial Intelligence Li, Fei Pan, Jianying Yang, Dalu Wu, Junde Ou, Yiling Li, Huiting Huang, Jiamin Xie, Huirui Ou, Dongmei Wu, Xiaoyi Wu, Binghong Sun, Qinpei Fang, Huihui Yang, Yehui Xu, Yanwu Luo, Yan Zhang, Xiulan A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm |
title | A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm |
title_full | A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm |
title_fullStr | A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm |
title_full_unstemmed | A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm |
title_short | A Multicenter Clinical Study of the Automated Fundus Screening Algorithm |
title_sort | multicenter clinical study of the automated fundus screening algorithm |
topic | Artificial Intelligence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35881410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.7.22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lifei amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT panjianying amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT yangdalu amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT wujunde amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT ouyiling amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT lihuiting amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT huangjiamin amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT xiehuirui amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT oudongmei amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT wuxiaoyi amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT wubinghong amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT sunqinpei amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT fanghuihui amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT yangyehui amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT xuyanwu amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT luoyan amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT zhangxiulan amulticenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT lifei multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT panjianying multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT yangdalu multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT wujunde multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT ouyiling multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT lihuiting multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT huangjiamin multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT xiehuirui multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT oudongmei multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT wuxiaoyi multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT wubinghong multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT sunqinpei multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT fanghuihui multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT yangyehui multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT xuyanwu multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT luoyan multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm AT zhangxiulan multicenterclinicalstudyoftheautomatedfundusscreeningalgorithm |