Cargando…

Did States With More Social Capital Pre-pandemic Offer Mental Health Protection During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-Sectional View

BACKGROUND: Social capital is a well-known health determinant with both relational and geographic aspects. It can help mitigate adverse events and has been shown to impact behaviors and responses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mental health has declined during the COVID-19 pandemic, and social capita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dauner, Kim Nichols, Wilmot, Neil A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35923950
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.947569
_version_ 1784760291713613824
author Dauner, Kim Nichols
Wilmot, Neil A.
author_facet Dauner, Kim Nichols
Wilmot, Neil A.
author_sort Dauner, Kim Nichols
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Social capital is a well-known health determinant with both relational and geographic aspects. It can help mitigate adverse events and has been shown to impact behaviors and responses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mental health has declined during the COVID-19 pandemic, and social capital, may serve to buffer those declines. METHODS: Building from this, we assessed whether pre-pandemic social capital and contemporaneous social policy, which included indicators of social trust, civic participation, and presence of mask mandates, affected pandemic mental health, measured as the percent of the population experiencing symptoms of depression and anxiety at the state level. RESULTS: Generalized social trust and state mask mandates were significantly associated with lower levels of depression and anxiety. Conversely, states with greater civic engagement prior to the pandemic experienced more anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that existing social capital, particularly social trust, may protect against anxiety and depression and contribute to community resilience during times of adversity. States should invest in policies and programs that increase social trust.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9339967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93399672022-08-02 Did States With More Social Capital Pre-pandemic Offer Mental Health Protection During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-Sectional View Dauner, Kim Nichols Wilmot, Neil A. Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Social capital is a well-known health determinant with both relational and geographic aspects. It can help mitigate adverse events and has been shown to impact behaviors and responses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mental health has declined during the COVID-19 pandemic, and social capital, may serve to buffer those declines. METHODS: Building from this, we assessed whether pre-pandemic social capital and contemporaneous social policy, which included indicators of social trust, civic participation, and presence of mask mandates, affected pandemic mental health, measured as the percent of the population experiencing symptoms of depression and anxiety at the state level. RESULTS: Generalized social trust and state mask mandates were significantly associated with lower levels of depression and anxiety. Conversely, states with greater civic engagement prior to the pandemic experienced more anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that existing social capital, particularly social trust, may protect against anxiety and depression and contribute to community resilience during times of adversity. States should invest in policies and programs that increase social trust. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9339967/ /pubmed/35923950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.947569 Text en Copyright © 2022 Dauner and Wilmot. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Dauner, Kim Nichols
Wilmot, Neil A.
Did States With More Social Capital Pre-pandemic Offer Mental Health Protection During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-Sectional View
title Did States With More Social Capital Pre-pandemic Offer Mental Health Protection During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-Sectional View
title_full Did States With More Social Capital Pre-pandemic Offer Mental Health Protection During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-Sectional View
title_fullStr Did States With More Social Capital Pre-pandemic Offer Mental Health Protection During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-Sectional View
title_full_unstemmed Did States With More Social Capital Pre-pandemic Offer Mental Health Protection During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-Sectional View
title_short Did States With More Social Capital Pre-pandemic Offer Mental Health Protection During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-Sectional View
title_sort did states with more social capital pre-pandemic offer mental health protection during the covid-19 pandemic? a cross-sectional view
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9339967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35923950
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.947569
work_keys_str_mv AT daunerkimnichols didstateswithmoresocialcapitalprepandemicoffermentalhealthprotectionduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalview
AT wilmotneila didstateswithmoresocialcapitalprepandemicoffermentalhealthprotectionduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalview