Cargando…

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of universal school-based mindfulness training compared with normal school provision in reducing risk of mental health problems and promoting well-being in adolescence: the MYRIAD cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews suggest school-based mindfulness training (SBMT) shows promise in promoting student mental health. OBJECTIVE: The My Resilience in Adolescence (MYRIAD) Trial evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of SBMT compared with teaching-as-usual (TAU). METHODS: MYRI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuyken, Willem, Ball, Susan, Crane, Catherine, Ganguli, Poushali, Jones, Benjamin, Montero-Marin, Jesus, Nuthall, Elizabeth, Raja, Anam, Taylor, Laura, Tudor, Kate, Viner, Russell M, Allwood, Matthew, Aukland, Louise, Dunning, Darren, Casey, Tríona, Dalrymple, Nicola, De Wilde, Katherine, Farley, Eleanor-Rose, Harper, Jennifer, Kappelmann, Nils, Kempnich, Maria, Lord, Liz, Medlicott, Emma, Palmer, Lucy, Petit, Ariane, Philips, Alice, Pryor-Nitsch, Isobel, Radley, Lucy, Sonley, Anna, Shackleford, Jem, Tickell, Alice, Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne, Team, The MYRIAD, Ukoumunne, Obioha C, Greenberg, Mark T, Ford, Tamsin, Dalgleish, Tim, Byford, Sarah, Williams, J Mark G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9340028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35820992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2021-300396
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews suggest school-based mindfulness training (SBMT) shows promise in promoting student mental health. OBJECTIVE: The My Resilience in Adolescence (MYRIAD) Trial evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of SBMT compared with teaching-as-usual (TAU). METHODS: MYRIAD was a parallel group, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Eighty-five eligible schools consented and were randomised 1:1 to TAU (43 schools, 4232 students) or SBMT (42 schools, 4144 students), stratified by school size, quality, type, deprivation and region. Schools and students (mean (SD); age range=12.2 (0.6); 11–14 years) were broadly UK population-representative. Forty-three schools (n=3678 pupils; 86.9%) delivering SBMT, and 41 schools (n=3572; 86.2%) delivering TAU, provided primary end-point data. SBMT comprised 10 lessons of psychoeducation and mindfulness practices. TAU comprised standard social-emotional teaching. Participant-level risk for depression, social-emotional-behavioural functioning and well-being at 1 year follow-up were the co-primary outcomes. Secondary and economic outcomes were included. FINDINGS: Analysis of 84 schools (n=8376 participants) found no evidence that SBMT was superior to TAU at 1 year. Standardised mean differences (intervention minus control) were: 0.005 (95% CI −0.05 to 0.06) for risk for depression; 0.02 (−0.02 to 0.07) for social-emotional-behavioural functioning; and 0.02 (−0.03 to 0.07) for well-being. SBMT had a high probability of cost-effectiveness (83%) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life year. No intervention-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Findings do not support the superiority of SBMT over TAU in promoting mental health in adolescence. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: There is need to ask what works, for whom and how, as well as considering key contextual and implementation factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials ISRCTN86619085. This research was funded by the Wellcome Trust (WT104908/Z/14/Z and WT107496/Z/15/Z).