Cargando…
Performance of NI-RADS on CECT Alone to Predict Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Chemoradiotherapy: Added Value of RECIST 1.1.
Background The Head and Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) is a standardized reporting format for the categorization of the degree of suspicion for recurrent head and neck malignancies on positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Purpose The purpose of our study was to analyz...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9340179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35924129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1754315 |
_version_ | 1784760343699914752 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Ishan Reza, Syed O. Choudhary, Sunil Shukla, Ram C. Mani, Nilesh Verma, Ashish |
author_facet | Kumar, Ishan Reza, Syed O. Choudhary, Sunil Shukla, Ram C. Mani, Nilesh Verma, Ashish |
author_sort | Kumar, Ishan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background The Head and Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) is a standardized reporting format for the categorization of the degree of suspicion for recurrent head and neck malignancies on positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Purpose The purpose of our study was to analyze the efficacy of the NI-RADS rating scale and criteria for contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) alone in predicting the local and regional recurrence of malignancies after chemoradiotherapy. Material and Methods CECT of the patients with head and neck cancers receiving radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy as a primary treatment was obtained 3 months after the completion of radiotherapy and NI-RADS scoring was done using components of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) criteria. Their management was guided according to the recommendations based on their NI-RADS score. Results Thirty patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the neck were included in this study. The positive or negative status of the recurrent disease was based on biopsy results or follow-up protocol as recommended in NI-RADS rating scale. Fifteen patients had path proven recurrence at the primary tumor site. For primary tumor site, disease persistence rates of 4% for NI-RADS 1, 24% for NI-RADS 2, and 80% for NI-RADS 3 scores were seen. Five patients had recurrent lymph nodal disease. For lymph nodal assessment, NI-RADS categories 1, 2, and 3 revealed nodal disease recurrence rates of 5.3, 25, and 66.7%, respectively. Conclusion CECT alone may be used to assign the NI-RADS rating scale using RECIST 1.1 criteria to predict the presence or absence of recurrent tumor in patients with neck malignancies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9340179 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93401792022-08-02 Performance of NI-RADS on CECT Alone to Predict Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Chemoradiotherapy: Added Value of RECIST 1.1. Kumar, Ishan Reza, Syed O. Choudhary, Sunil Shukla, Ram C. Mani, Nilesh Verma, Ashish Indian J Radiol Imaging Background The Head and Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) is a standardized reporting format for the categorization of the degree of suspicion for recurrent head and neck malignancies on positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Purpose The purpose of our study was to analyze the efficacy of the NI-RADS rating scale and criteria for contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) alone in predicting the local and regional recurrence of malignancies after chemoradiotherapy. Material and Methods CECT of the patients with head and neck cancers receiving radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy as a primary treatment was obtained 3 months after the completion of radiotherapy and NI-RADS scoring was done using components of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) criteria. Their management was guided according to the recommendations based on their NI-RADS score. Results Thirty patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the neck were included in this study. The positive or negative status of the recurrent disease was based on biopsy results or follow-up protocol as recommended in NI-RADS rating scale. Fifteen patients had path proven recurrence at the primary tumor site. For primary tumor site, disease persistence rates of 4% for NI-RADS 1, 24% for NI-RADS 2, and 80% for NI-RADS 3 scores were seen. Five patients had recurrent lymph nodal disease. For lymph nodal assessment, NI-RADS categories 1, 2, and 3 revealed nodal disease recurrence rates of 5.3, 25, and 66.7%, respectively. Conclusion CECT alone may be used to assign the NI-RADS rating scale using RECIST 1.1 criteria to predict the presence or absence of recurrent tumor in patients with neck malignancies. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9340179/ /pubmed/35924129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1754315 Text en Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Kumar, Ishan Reza, Syed O. Choudhary, Sunil Shukla, Ram C. Mani, Nilesh Verma, Ashish Performance of NI-RADS on CECT Alone to Predict Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Chemoradiotherapy: Added Value of RECIST 1.1. |
title | Performance of NI-RADS on CECT Alone to Predict Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Chemoradiotherapy: Added Value of RECIST 1.1. |
title_full | Performance of NI-RADS on CECT Alone to Predict Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Chemoradiotherapy: Added Value of RECIST 1.1. |
title_fullStr | Performance of NI-RADS on CECT Alone to Predict Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Chemoradiotherapy: Added Value of RECIST 1.1. |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of NI-RADS on CECT Alone to Predict Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Chemoradiotherapy: Added Value of RECIST 1.1. |
title_short | Performance of NI-RADS on CECT Alone to Predict Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Chemoradiotherapy: Added Value of RECIST 1.1. |
title_sort | performance of ni-rads on cect alone to predict recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy: added value of recist 1.1. |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9340179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35924129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1754315 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarishan performanceofniradsoncectalonetopredictrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaafterchemoradiotherapyaddedvalueofrecist11 AT rezasyedo performanceofniradsoncectalonetopredictrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaafterchemoradiotherapyaddedvalueofrecist11 AT choudharysunil performanceofniradsoncectalonetopredictrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaafterchemoradiotherapyaddedvalueofrecist11 AT shuklaramc performanceofniradsoncectalonetopredictrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaafterchemoradiotherapyaddedvalueofrecist11 AT maninilesh performanceofniradsoncectalonetopredictrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaafterchemoradiotherapyaddedvalueofrecist11 AT vermaashish performanceofniradsoncectalonetopredictrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomaafterchemoradiotherapyaddedvalueofrecist11 |