Cargando…
Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
Background Seroma formation is the most common donor site complication following autologous breast reconstruction, along with hematoma. Seroma may lead to patient discomfort and may prolong hospital stay or delay adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to compare seroma rates between the deep...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9340184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35919555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1751103 |
_version_ | 1784760344894242816 |
---|---|
author | Merchant, Alisha Speck, Nicole E. Michalak, Michal Schaefer, Dirk J. Farhadi, Jian |
author_facet | Merchant, Alisha Speck, Nicole E. Michalak, Michal Schaefer, Dirk J. Farhadi, Jian |
author_sort | Merchant, Alisha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Seroma formation is the most common donor site complication following autologous breast reconstruction, along with hematoma. Seroma may lead to patient discomfort and may prolong hospital stay or delay adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to compare seroma rates between the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP), transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG), and superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) donor sites. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study consisting of chart review of all patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from April 2018 to June 2020. The primary outcome studied was frequency of seroma formation at the different donor sites. The secondary outcome evaluated potential prognostic properties associated with seroma formation. Third, the number of donor site seroma evacuations was compared between the three donor sites. Results Overall, 242 breast reconstructions were performed in 189 patients. Demographic data were found statistically comparable between the three flap cohorts, except for body mass index (BMI). Frequency of seroma formation was highest at the SGAP donor site (75.0%), followed by the TMG (65.0%), and DIEP (28.6%) donor sites. No association was found between seroma formation and BMI, age at surgery, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or DIEP laterality. The mean number of seroma evacuations was significantly higher in the SGAP and the TMG group compared with the DIEP group. Conclusion This study provides a single center's experience regarding seroma formation at the donor site after microsurgical breast reconstruction. The observed rate of donor site seroma formation was comparably high, especially in the TMG and SGAP group, necessitating an adaption of the surgical protocol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9340184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93401842022-08-01 Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Merchant, Alisha Speck, Nicole E. Michalak, Michal Schaefer, Dirk J. Farhadi, Jian Arch Plast Surg Background Seroma formation is the most common donor site complication following autologous breast reconstruction, along with hematoma. Seroma may lead to patient discomfort and may prolong hospital stay or delay adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to compare seroma rates between the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP), transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG), and superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) donor sites. Methods The authors conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study consisting of chart review of all patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from April 2018 to June 2020. The primary outcome studied was frequency of seroma formation at the different donor sites. The secondary outcome evaluated potential prognostic properties associated with seroma formation. Third, the number of donor site seroma evacuations was compared between the three donor sites. Results Overall, 242 breast reconstructions were performed in 189 patients. Demographic data were found statistically comparable between the three flap cohorts, except for body mass index (BMI). Frequency of seroma formation was highest at the SGAP donor site (75.0%), followed by the TMG (65.0%), and DIEP (28.6%) donor sites. No association was found between seroma formation and BMI, age at surgery, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or DIEP laterality. The mean number of seroma evacuations was significantly higher in the SGAP and the TMG group compared with the DIEP group. Conclusion This study provides a single center's experience regarding seroma formation at the donor site after microsurgical breast reconstruction. The observed rate of donor site seroma formation was comparably high, especially in the TMG and SGAP group, necessitating an adaption of the surgical protocol. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9340184/ /pubmed/35919555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1751103 Text en The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Merchant, Alisha Speck, Nicole E. Michalak, Michal Schaefer, Dirk J. Farhadi, Jian Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction |
title | Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction |
title_full | Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction |
title_short | Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction |
title_sort | comparing seroma formation at the deep inferior epigastric perforator, transverse musculocutaneous gracilis, and superior gluteal artery perforator flap donor sites after microsurgical breast reconstruction |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9340184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35919555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1751103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT merchantalisha comparingseromaformationatthedeepinferiorepigastricperforatortransversemusculocutaneousgracilisandsuperiorglutealarteryperforatorflapdonorsitesaftermicrosurgicalbreastreconstruction AT specknicolee comparingseromaformationatthedeepinferiorepigastricperforatortransversemusculocutaneousgracilisandsuperiorglutealarteryperforatorflapdonorsitesaftermicrosurgicalbreastreconstruction AT michalakmichal comparingseromaformationatthedeepinferiorepigastricperforatortransversemusculocutaneousgracilisandsuperiorglutealarteryperforatorflapdonorsitesaftermicrosurgicalbreastreconstruction AT schaeferdirkj comparingseromaformationatthedeepinferiorepigastricperforatortransversemusculocutaneousgracilisandsuperiorglutealarteryperforatorflapdonorsitesaftermicrosurgicalbreastreconstruction AT farhadijian comparingseromaformationatthedeepinferiorepigastricperforatortransversemusculocutaneousgracilisandsuperiorglutealarteryperforatorflapdonorsitesaftermicrosurgicalbreastreconstruction |