Cargando…

Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

Background  Seroma formation is the most common donor site complication following autologous breast reconstruction, along with hematoma. Seroma may lead to patient discomfort and may prolong hospital stay or delay adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to compare seroma rates between the deep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merchant, Alisha, Speck, Nicole E., Michalak, Michal, Schaefer, Dirk J., Farhadi, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9340184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35919555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1751103
_version_ 1784760344894242816
author Merchant, Alisha
Speck, Nicole E.
Michalak, Michal
Schaefer, Dirk J.
Farhadi, Jian
author_facet Merchant, Alisha
Speck, Nicole E.
Michalak, Michal
Schaefer, Dirk J.
Farhadi, Jian
author_sort Merchant, Alisha
collection PubMed
description Background  Seroma formation is the most common donor site complication following autologous breast reconstruction, along with hematoma. Seroma may lead to patient discomfort and may prolong hospital stay or delay adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to compare seroma rates between the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP), transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG), and superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) donor sites. Methods  The authors conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study consisting of chart review of all patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from April 2018 to June 2020. The primary outcome studied was frequency of seroma formation at the different donor sites. The secondary outcome evaluated potential prognostic properties associated with seroma formation. Third, the number of donor site seroma evacuations was compared between the three donor sites. Results  Overall, 242 breast reconstructions were performed in 189 patients. Demographic data were found statistically comparable between the three flap cohorts, except for body mass index (BMI). Frequency of seroma formation was highest at the SGAP donor site (75.0%), followed by the TMG (65.0%), and DIEP (28.6%) donor sites. No association was found between seroma formation and BMI, age at surgery, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or DIEP laterality. The mean number of seroma evacuations was significantly higher in the SGAP and the TMG group compared with the DIEP group. Conclusion  This study provides a single center's experience regarding seroma formation at the donor site after microsurgical breast reconstruction. The observed rate of donor site seroma formation was comparably high, especially in the TMG and SGAP group, necessitating an adaption of the surgical protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9340184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93401842022-08-01 Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Merchant, Alisha Speck, Nicole E. Michalak, Michal Schaefer, Dirk J. Farhadi, Jian Arch Plast Surg Background  Seroma formation is the most common donor site complication following autologous breast reconstruction, along with hematoma. Seroma may lead to patient discomfort and may prolong hospital stay or delay adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to compare seroma rates between the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP), transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG), and superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) donor sites. Methods  The authors conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study consisting of chart review of all patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from April 2018 to June 2020. The primary outcome studied was frequency of seroma formation at the different donor sites. The secondary outcome evaluated potential prognostic properties associated with seroma formation. Third, the number of donor site seroma evacuations was compared between the three donor sites. Results  Overall, 242 breast reconstructions were performed in 189 patients. Demographic data were found statistically comparable between the three flap cohorts, except for body mass index (BMI). Frequency of seroma formation was highest at the SGAP donor site (75.0%), followed by the TMG (65.0%), and DIEP (28.6%) donor sites. No association was found between seroma formation and BMI, age at surgery, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or DIEP laterality. The mean number of seroma evacuations was significantly higher in the SGAP and the TMG group compared with the DIEP group. Conclusion  This study provides a single center's experience regarding seroma formation at the donor site after microsurgical breast reconstruction. The observed rate of donor site seroma formation was comparably high, especially in the TMG and SGAP group, necessitating an adaption of the surgical protocol. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9340184/ /pubmed/35919555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1751103 Text en The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Merchant, Alisha
Speck, Nicole E.
Michalak, Michal
Schaefer, Dirk J.
Farhadi, Jian
Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
title Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
title_full Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
title_short Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
title_sort comparing seroma formation at the deep inferior epigastric perforator, transverse musculocutaneous gracilis, and superior gluteal artery perforator flap donor sites after microsurgical breast reconstruction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9340184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35919555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1751103
work_keys_str_mv AT merchantalisha comparingseromaformationatthedeepinferiorepigastricperforatortransversemusculocutaneousgracilisandsuperiorglutealarteryperforatorflapdonorsitesaftermicrosurgicalbreastreconstruction
AT specknicolee comparingseromaformationatthedeepinferiorepigastricperforatortransversemusculocutaneousgracilisandsuperiorglutealarteryperforatorflapdonorsitesaftermicrosurgicalbreastreconstruction
AT michalakmichal comparingseromaformationatthedeepinferiorepigastricperforatortransversemusculocutaneousgracilisandsuperiorglutealarteryperforatorflapdonorsitesaftermicrosurgicalbreastreconstruction
AT schaeferdirkj comparingseromaformationatthedeepinferiorepigastricperforatortransversemusculocutaneousgracilisandsuperiorglutealarteryperforatorflapdonorsitesaftermicrosurgicalbreastreconstruction
AT farhadijian comparingseromaformationatthedeepinferiorepigastricperforatortransversemusculocutaneousgracilisandsuperiorglutealarteryperforatorflapdonorsitesaftermicrosurgicalbreastreconstruction