Cargando…

What is the physiological impact of reducing the 2,000 m Olympic distance in rowing to 1,500 m and 1,000 m for French young competitive rowers? Insights from the energy system contribution

French rowing federation reduced the competition distance to 1,500 and 1,000 m in rowers under 16- (U16) and 14-year-old (U14) respectively, to prepare them progressively to the Olympic 2,000 m distance in under 18-year-old (U18). This study aimed to check the hypothesis that relative aerobic (%E(Ae...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diry, Allison, Ratel, Sébastien, Nevill, Alan, Maciejewski, Hugo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9340205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35923235
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.896975
_version_ 1784760350133977088
author Diry, Allison
Ratel, Sébastien
Nevill, Alan
Maciejewski, Hugo
author_facet Diry, Allison
Ratel, Sébastien
Nevill, Alan
Maciejewski, Hugo
author_sort Diry, Allison
collection PubMed
description French rowing federation reduced the competition distance to 1,500 and 1,000 m in rowers under 16- (U16) and 14-year-old (U14) respectively, to prepare them progressively to the Olympic 2,000 m distance in under 18-year-old (U18). This study aimed to check the hypothesis that relative aerobic (%E(Ae)) and anaerobic (%E(An)) energy contributions would be comparable between the competition distances since the more oxidative profile of younger age categories could offset the greater anaerobic contribution induced by shorter rowing races. Thirty-one 12- to 17-year-old competitive rowers performed a race of 2,000, 1,500, or 1,000 m on a rowing ergometer according to their age category. %E(Ae) and %E(An) were estimated from oxygen consumption, changes in blood lactate concentration and their energy equivalents. %E(Ae) was lower in U16 than U18 (84.7 vs. 87.0%, p < 0.01), and in U14 than U16 (80.6 vs. 84.7%, p < 0.001). %E(An) was higher in U16 than U18 (15.3 vs. 13.0%, p < 0.01), and in U14 than U16 (19.4 vs. 15.3%, p < 0.01). The results did not confirm our initial hypothesis since %E(Ae) and %E(An) were significantly different between the race distances, and thus age categories. However, %E(An) in U18, U16 and U14 were found to be in the range of values previously found in adult rowers over the 2,000 m Olympic distance (12–30%). Therefore, on a practical level, the strategy implemented by the French rowing federation to reduce the competition distance in the younger age categories could be relevant to progressively prepare them to the physiological requirements encountered over the Olympic distance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9340205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93402052022-08-02 What is the physiological impact of reducing the 2,000 m Olympic distance in rowing to 1,500 m and 1,000 m for French young competitive rowers? Insights from the energy system contribution Diry, Allison Ratel, Sébastien Nevill, Alan Maciejewski, Hugo Front Physiol Physiology French rowing federation reduced the competition distance to 1,500 and 1,000 m in rowers under 16- (U16) and 14-year-old (U14) respectively, to prepare them progressively to the Olympic 2,000 m distance in under 18-year-old (U18). This study aimed to check the hypothesis that relative aerobic (%E(Ae)) and anaerobic (%E(An)) energy contributions would be comparable between the competition distances since the more oxidative profile of younger age categories could offset the greater anaerobic contribution induced by shorter rowing races. Thirty-one 12- to 17-year-old competitive rowers performed a race of 2,000, 1,500, or 1,000 m on a rowing ergometer according to their age category. %E(Ae) and %E(An) were estimated from oxygen consumption, changes in blood lactate concentration and their energy equivalents. %E(Ae) was lower in U16 than U18 (84.7 vs. 87.0%, p < 0.01), and in U14 than U16 (80.6 vs. 84.7%, p < 0.001). %E(An) was higher in U16 than U18 (15.3 vs. 13.0%, p < 0.01), and in U14 than U16 (19.4 vs. 15.3%, p < 0.01). The results did not confirm our initial hypothesis since %E(Ae) and %E(An) were significantly different between the race distances, and thus age categories. However, %E(An) in U18, U16 and U14 were found to be in the range of values previously found in adult rowers over the 2,000 m Olympic distance (12–30%). Therefore, on a practical level, the strategy implemented by the French rowing federation to reduce the competition distance in the younger age categories could be relevant to progressively prepare them to the physiological requirements encountered over the Olympic distance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9340205/ /pubmed/35923235 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.896975 Text en Copyright © 2022 Diry, Ratel, Nevill and Maciejewski. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Diry, Allison
Ratel, Sébastien
Nevill, Alan
Maciejewski, Hugo
What is the physiological impact of reducing the 2,000 m Olympic distance in rowing to 1,500 m and 1,000 m for French young competitive rowers? Insights from the energy system contribution
title What is the physiological impact of reducing the 2,000 m Olympic distance in rowing to 1,500 m and 1,000 m for French young competitive rowers? Insights from the energy system contribution
title_full What is the physiological impact of reducing the 2,000 m Olympic distance in rowing to 1,500 m and 1,000 m for French young competitive rowers? Insights from the energy system contribution
title_fullStr What is the physiological impact of reducing the 2,000 m Olympic distance in rowing to 1,500 m and 1,000 m for French young competitive rowers? Insights from the energy system contribution
title_full_unstemmed What is the physiological impact of reducing the 2,000 m Olympic distance in rowing to 1,500 m and 1,000 m for French young competitive rowers? Insights from the energy system contribution
title_short What is the physiological impact of reducing the 2,000 m Olympic distance in rowing to 1,500 m and 1,000 m for French young competitive rowers? Insights from the energy system contribution
title_sort what is the physiological impact of reducing the 2,000 m olympic distance in rowing to 1,500 m and 1,000 m for french young competitive rowers? insights from the energy system contribution
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9340205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35923235
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.896975
work_keys_str_mv AT diryallison whatisthephysiologicalimpactofreducingthe2000molympicdistanceinrowingto1500mand1000mforfrenchyoungcompetitiverowersinsightsfromtheenergysystemcontribution
AT ratelsebastien whatisthephysiologicalimpactofreducingthe2000molympicdistanceinrowingto1500mand1000mforfrenchyoungcompetitiverowersinsightsfromtheenergysystemcontribution
AT nevillalan whatisthephysiologicalimpactofreducingthe2000molympicdistanceinrowingto1500mand1000mforfrenchyoungcompetitiverowersinsightsfromtheenergysystemcontribution
AT maciejewskihugo whatisthephysiologicalimpactofreducingthe2000molympicdistanceinrowingto1500mand1000mforfrenchyoungcompetitiverowersinsightsfromtheenergysystemcontribution