Poster 176: International Expert Consensus on Return to Sport Criteria Following Shoulder Stabilization Surgery: A Delphi Study

OBJECTIVES: A comprehensive approach to standardize the criteria of return to sport (RTS) following common shoulder procedure in athletes is required to safely return the physically active population to sport postoperatively. There is lack of studies validating the RTS criteria following arthroscopic and/or open shoulder stabilization surgery. We developed a list of widely accepted criteria of RTS following shoulder stabilization surgery using Delphi consensus methods with international experts. METHODS: A working group developed a list of approximately 50 criteria. Experts included 27 world renowned shoulder surgeons from various countries who have been recognized as international experts in the field and were invited speakers to international sports medicine meetings rated their agreement to each of the listed criteria. Experts were surveyed on 3 occasions to establish consensus on the inclusion of each RTS criterion in the final list of accepted criteria of RTS after shoulder stabilization surgery. For each round, a 70% agreement was used as a cutoff for consensus. Statements without this level of agreement were excluded in subsequent rounds. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Predefined criteria were used to refine item lists after each survey. Final list of criteria of RTS following shoulder stabilization surgery was complied by the working group and included those that received > 75% agreement on all 3 rounds of rating by experts. RESULTS: We initially identified 50 RTS criteria following shoulder stabilization surgery from the literature that the experts were asked to rate their agreement. Twenty-seven international experts completed the rating in all 3 rounds. The RTS criteria were divided consisted of 5 subgroups including current evidence, ideal characteristics of the RTS criteria, general considerations for RTS criteria, specific considerations for RTS criteria, and dissemination of RTS criteria following shoulder stabilization. For Round 1, the response rate was 100% and 10 (20%) of 47 criteria were eliminated leaving 37 statements for evaluation in Round 2. Round 2 had a 100% response rate, and 1 (2.5%) statement was eliminated leaving 36 criteria for the final round. Round 3 had a 96% response rate, and no statements were eliminated. Respondents agreed on a total 36 statements to define the RTS criteria following shoulder stabilization in athletes. Table 1 provides the final list of accepted criteria and the percentage of agreement for each individual criterion. CONCLUSIONS: The final list of statements agreed upon by international experts provide insight into a standardized return to sport criteria following shoulder stabilization surgery in physically active patients. This agreed upon criteria can aid those providing care to athletes in their decision making when determining optimal timing for return to sport.