Cargando…

A clinical test to assess isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (WAD): a reliability study

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine muscle weakness is well demonstrated in individuals with chronic neck pain. There is a lack of literature evaluating clinically applicable means of assessing isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (WAD). This study assessed the reliability of s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habberfield, Jeff, Schneider, Geoff, Schneider, Kathryn, Katuli, Sozina, Olson, Lee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9341054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35915421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05703-0
_version_ 1784760531581665280
author Habberfield, Jeff
Schneider, Geoff
Schneider, Kathryn
Katuli, Sozina
Olson, Lee
author_facet Habberfield, Jeff
Schneider, Geoff
Schneider, Kathryn
Katuli, Sozina
Olson, Lee
author_sort Habberfield, Jeff
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervical spine muscle weakness is well demonstrated in individuals with chronic neck pain. There is a lack of literature evaluating clinically applicable means of assessing isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (WAD). This study assessed the reliability of self-resisted isometric cervical strength testing using a handheld dynamometer. The relationship between strength and neck pain-related disability and kinesiophobia was also investigated. METHODS: Twenty subjects with chronic WAD performed maximum-effort isometric cervical flexion, extension, side flexion, and rotation against a hand held dynamometer. The dynamometer was held by the subject, who provided self-resistance. Subjects completed two sessions of testing on one day with two different examiners, and one session on a subsequent day with one of the original examiners. Subjects completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) prior to the first testing session. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for directional strength measures were fair to high (0.71–0.88 for intra-rater and 0.79–0.91 for inter-rater). Total strength (sum of all directional strengths) ICCs were high for both intra-rater (ICC = 0.91) and inter-rater (ICC = 0.94) measures. All statistical tests for ICCs demonstrated significance (α < 0.05). Agreement was assessed using Bland Altman (BA) analysis with 95% limits of agreement. BA analysis demonstrated difference scores between the two testing sessions that ranged from 3.0—17.3% and 4.5—28.5% of the mean score for intra and inter-rater measures, respectively. Most measures did not meet the a priori standard for agreement. A moderate to good inverse relationship was demonstrated between kinesiophobia (TSK score) and six out of seven strength measures (α < .05). No significant correlation was found between neck disability (NDI) and cervical strength in any direction. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated fair to high reliability of self resisted isometric cervical strength testing in the chronic WAD population. All directional strength measures except flexion demonstrated a significant inverse relationship with kinesiophobia. No cervical strength measures were correlated with neck disability. These results support testing cervical strength in this manner to reliably assess change over time within individual patients. The value of such measurement requires further consideration given the lack of correlation between cervical strength and disability. Further research is required to establish normative values and enhance clinical utility. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05703-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9341054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93410542022-08-02 A clinical test to assess isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (WAD): a reliability study Habberfield, Jeff Schneider, Geoff Schneider, Kathryn Katuli, Sozina Olson, Lee BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Cervical spine muscle weakness is well demonstrated in individuals with chronic neck pain. There is a lack of literature evaluating clinically applicable means of assessing isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (WAD). This study assessed the reliability of self-resisted isometric cervical strength testing using a handheld dynamometer. The relationship between strength and neck pain-related disability and kinesiophobia was also investigated. METHODS: Twenty subjects with chronic WAD performed maximum-effort isometric cervical flexion, extension, side flexion, and rotation against a hand held dynamometer. The dynamometer was held by the subject, who provided self-resistance. Subjects completed two sessions of testing on one day with two different examiners, and one session on a subsequent day with one of the original examiners. Subjects completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) prior to the first testing session. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for directional strength measures were fair to high (0.71–0.88 for intra-rater and 0.79–0.91 for inter-rater). Total strength (sum of all directional strengths) ICCs were high for both intra-rater (ICC = 0.91) and inter-rater (ICC = 0.94) measures. All statistical tests for ICCs demonstrated significance (α < 0.05). Agreement was assessed using Bland Altman (BA) analysis with 95% limits of agreement. BA analysis demonstrated difference scores between the two testing sessions that ranged from 3.0—17.3% and 4.5—28.5% of the mean score for intra and inter-rater measures, respectively. Most measures did not meet the a priori standard for agreement. A moderate to good inverse relationship was demonstrated between kinesiophobia (TSK score) and six out of seven strength measures (α < .05). No significant correlation was found between neck disability (NDI) and cervical strength in any direction. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated fair to high reliability of self resisted isometric cervical strength testing in the chronic WAD population. All directional strength measures except flexion demonstrated a significant inverse relationship with kinesiophobia. No cervical strength measures were correlated with neck disability. These results support testing cervical strength in this manner to reliably assess change over time within individual patients. The value of such measurement requires further consideration given the lack of correlation between cervical strength and disability. Further research is required to establish normative values and enhance clinical utility. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05703-0. BioMed Central 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9341054/ /pubmed/35915421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05703-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Habberfield, Jeff
Schneider, Geoff
Schneider, Kathryn
Katuli, Sozina
Olson, Lee
A clinical test to assess isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (WAD): a reliability study
title A clinical test to assess isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (WAD): a reliability study
title_full A clinical test to assess isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (WAD): a reliability study
title_fullStr A clinical test to assess isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (WAD): a reliability study
title_full_unstemmed A clinical test to assess isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (WAD): a reliability study
title_short A clinical test to assess isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (WAD): a reliability study
title_sort clinical test to assess isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (wad): a reliability study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9341054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35915421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05703-0
work_keys_str_mv AT habberfieldjeff aclinicaltesttoassessisometriccervicalstrengthinchronicwhiplashassociateddisorderwadareliabilitystudy
AT schneidergeoff aclinicaltesttoassessisometriccervicalstrengthinchronicwhiplashassociateddisorderwadareliabilitystudy
AT schneiderkathryn aclinicaltesttoassessisometriccervicalstrengthinchronicwhiplashassociateddisorderwadareliabilitystudy
AT katulisozina aclinicaltesttoassessisometriccervicalstrengthinchronicwhiplashassociateddisorderwadareliabilitystudy
AT olsonlee aclinicaltesttoassessisometriccervicalstrengthinchronicwhiplashassociateddisorderwadareliabilitystudy
AT habberfieldjeff clinicaltesttoassessisometriccervicalstrengthinchronicwhiplashassociateddisorderwadareliabilitystudy
AT schneidergeoff clinicaltesttoassessisometriccervicalstrengthinchronicwhiplashassociateddisorderwadareliabilitystudy
AT schneiderkathryn clinicaltesttoassessisometriccervicalstrengthinchronicwhiplashassociateddisorderwadareliabilitystudy
AT katulisozina clinicaltesttoassessisometriccervicalstrengthinchronicwhiplashassociateddisorderwadareliabilitystudy
AT olsonlee clinicaltesttoassessisometriccervicalstrengthinchronicwhiplashassociateddisorderwadareliabilitystudy