Cargando…

External validation of six clinical models for prediction of chronic kidney disease in a German population

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is responsible for large personal health and societal burdens. Screening populations at higher risk for CKD is effective to initiate earlier treatment and decelerate disease progress. We externally validated clinical prediction models for unknown CKD that mig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stolpe, Susanne, Kowall, Bernd, Zwanziger, Denise, Frank, Mirjam, Jöckel, Karl-Heinz, Erbel, Raimund, Stang, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9341089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35915408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02899-0
_version_ 1784760538579861504
author Stolpe, Susanne
Kowall, Bernd
Zwanziger, Denise
Frank, Mirjam
Jöckel, Karl-Heinz
Erbel, Raimund
Stang, Andreas
author_facet Stolpe, Susanne
Kowall, Bernd
Zwanziger, Denise
Frank, Mirjam
Jöckel, Karl-Heinz
Erbel, Raimund
Stang, Andreas
author_sort Stolpe, Susanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is responsible for large personal health and societal burdens. Screening populations at higher risk for CKD is effective to initiate earlier treatment and decelerate disease progress. We externally validated clinical prediction models for unknown CKD that might be used in population screening. METHODS: We validated six risk models for prediction of CKD using only non-invasive parameters. Validation data came from 4,185 participants of the German Heinz-Nixdorf-Recall study (HNR), drawn in 2000 from a general population aged 45–75 years. We estimated discrimination and calibration using the full model information, and calculated the diagnostic properties applying the published scoring algorithms of the models using various thresholds for the sum of scores. RESULTS: The risk models used four to nine parameters. Age and hypertension were included in all models. Five out of six c-values ranged from 0.71 to 0.73, indicating fair discrimination. Positive predictive values ranged from 15 to 19%, negative predictive values were > 93% using score thresholds that resulted in values for sensitivity and specificity above 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the selected CKD prediction models show fair discrimination in a German general population. The estimated diagnostic properties indicate that the models are suitable for identifying persons at higher risk for unknown CKD without invasive procedures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-022-02899-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9341089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93410892022-08-02 External validation of six clinical models for prediction of chronic kidney disease in a German population Stolpe, Susanne Kowall, Bernd Zwanziger, Denise Frank, Mirjam Jöckel, Karl-Heinz Erbel, Raimund Stang, Andreas BMC Nephrol Research BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is responsible for large personal health and societal burdens. Screening populations at higher risk for CKD is effective to initiate earlier treatment and decelerate disease progress. We externally validated clinical prediction models for unknown CKD that might be used in population screening. METHODS: We validated six risk models for prediction of CKD using only non-invasive parameters. Validation data came from 4,185 participants of the German Heinz-Nixdorf-Recall study (HNR), drawn in 2000 from a general population aged 45–75 years. We estimated discrimination and calibration using the full model information, and calculated the diagnostic properties applying the published scoring algorithms of the models using various thresholds for the sum of scores. RESULTS: The risk models used four to nine parameters. Age and hypertension were included in all models. Five out of six c-values ranged from 0.71 to 0.73, indicating fair discrimination. Positive predictive values ranged from 15 to 19%, negative predictive values were > 93% using score thresholds that resulted in values for sensitivity and specificity above 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the selected CKD prediction models show fair discrimination in a German general population. The estimated diagnostic properties indicate that the models are suitable for identifying persons at higher risk for unknown CKD without invasive procedures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-022-02899-0. BioMed Central 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9341089/ /pubmed/35915408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02899-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Stolpe, Susanne
Kowall, Bernd
Zwanziger, Denise
Frank, Mirjam
Jöckel, Karl-Heinz
Erbel, Raimund
Stang, Andreas
External validation of six clinical models for prediction of chronic kidney disease in a German population
title External validation of six clinical models for prediction of chronic kidney disease in a German population
title_full External validation of six clinical models for prediction of chronic kidney disease in a German population
title_fullStr External validation of six clinical models for prediction of chronic kidney disease in a German population
title_full_unstemmed External validation of six clinical models for prediction of chronic kidney disease in a German population
title_short External validation of six clinical models for prediction of chronic kidney disease in a German population
title_sort external validation of six clinical models for prediction of chronic kidney disease in a german population
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9341089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35915408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-02899-0
work_keys_str_mv AT stolpesusanne externalvalidationofsixclinicalmodelsforpredictionofchronickidneydiseaseinagermanpopulation
AT kowallbernd externalvalidationofsixclinicalmodelsforpredictionofchronickidneydiseaseinagermanpopulation
AT zwanzigerdenise externalvalidationofsixclinicalmodelsforpredictionofchronickidneydiseaseinagermanpopulation
AT frankmirjam externalvalidationofsixclinicalmodelsforpredictionofchronickidneydiseaseinagermanpopulation
AT jockelkarlheinz externalvalidationofsixclinicalmodelsforpredictionofchronickidneydiseaseinagermanpopulation
AT erbelraimund externalvalidationofsixclinicalmodelsforpredictionofchronickidneydiseaseinagermanpopulation
AT stangandreas externalvalidationofsixclinicalmodelsforpredictionofchronickidneydiseaseinagermanpopulation