Cargando…

Simulation-based Assessment to Measure Proficiency in Mechanical Ventilation among Residents

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation (MV) skills are essential for clinicians caring for critically ill patients, yet few training programs use structured curricula and appropriate assessments. Objective structured clinical exams (OSCEs) have been used to assess clinical competency in many areas, but...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayashi, Fatima K., Sousa, Mayson L. A., Garcia, Marcos V. F., Macedo, Bruno R., Ferreira, Juliana C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Thoracic Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9341499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35924199
http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0130OC
_version_ 1784760620642467840
author Hayashi, Fatima K.
Sousa, Mayson L. A.
Garcia, Marcos V. F.
Macedo, Bruno R.
Ferreira, Juliana C.
author_facet Hayashi, Fatima K.
Sousa, Mayson L. A.
Garcia, Marcos V. F.
Macedo, Bruno R.
Ferreira, Juliana C.
author_sort Hayashi, Fatima K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation (MV) skills are essential for clinicians caring for critically ill patients, yet few training programs use structured curricula and appropriate assessments. Objective structured clinical exams (OSCEs) have been used to assess clinical competency in many areas, but there are no OSCE models focused on MV. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a simulation-based assessment (SBA) with an OSCE structure to assess baseline MV competence among residents and identify knowledge gaps. METHODS: We developed an SBA using a lung simulator and a mechanical ventilator, and an OSCE structure, with six clinical scenarios in MV. We included internal medicine residents at the beginning of their rotation in the respiratory intensive care unit (ICU) of a university-affiliated hospital. A subset of residents was also evaluated with a validated multiple-choice exam (MCE) at the beginning and at the end of the ICU rotation. Scores on both assessments were normalized to range from 0 to 10. We used Cronbach’s α coefficient to assess reliability and Spearman correlation to estimate the correlation between the SBA and the MCE. RESULTS: We included 80 residents, of whom 42 also completed the MCE examinations. The final version of the SBA had 32 items, and the Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64–0.81). The average SBA score was 6.2 ± 1.3, and performance was variable across items, with 80% correctly adjusting initial ventilatory settings and only 12% correctly identifying asynchrony. The MCE had 24 questions, and the average score was 7.6 ± 2.4 at the beginning of the rotation and 8.2 ± 2.3 at the end of the rotation (increase of 0.6 points; 95% CI, 0.30–0.90; P < 0.001). There was moderate correlation between the SBA and the MCE (rho = 0.41; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: We developed and validated an objective structured assessment on MV using a pulmonary simulator and a mechanical ventilator addressing the main competencies in MV. The performance of residents in the SBA at the beginning of an ICU rotation was lower than the performance in MCE, highlighting the need for greater emphasis on practical skills in MV during residency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9341499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Thoracic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93414992022-08-02 Simulation-based Assessment to Measure Proficiency in Mechanical Ventilation among Residents Hayashi, Fatima K. Sousa, Mayson L. A. Garcia, Marcos V. F. Macedo, Bruno R. Ferreira, Juliana C. ATS Sch Original Research BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation (MV) skills are essential for clinicians caring for critically ill patients, yet few training programs use structured curricula and appropriate assessments. Objective structured clinical exams (OSCEs) have been used to assess clinical competency in many areas, but there are no OSCE models focused on MV. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a simulation-based assessment (SBA) with an OSCE structure to assess baseline MV competence among residents and identify knowledge gaps. METHODS: We developed an SBA using a lung simulator and a mechanical ventilator, and an OSCE structure, with six clinical scenarios in MV. We included internal medicine residents at the beginning of their rotation in the respiratory intensive care unit (ICU) of a university-affiliated hospital. A subset of residents was also evaluated with a validated multiple-choice exam (MCE) at the beginning and at the end of the ICU rotation. Scores on both assessments were normalized to range from 0 to 10. We used Cronbach’s α coefficient to assess reliability and Spearman correlation to estimate the correlation between the SBA and the MCE. RESULTS: We included 80 residents, of whom 42 also completed the MCE examinations. The final version of the SBA had 32 items, and the Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64–0.81). The average SBA score was 6.2 ± 1.3, and performance was variable across items, with 80% correctly adjusting initial ventilatory settings and only 12% correctly identifying asynchrony. The MCE had 24 questions, and the average score was 7.6 ± 2.4 at the beginning of the rotation and 8.2 ± 2.3 at the end of the rotation (increase of 0.6 points; 95% CI, 0.30–0.90; P < 0.001). There was moderate correlation between the SBA and the MCE (rho = 0.41; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: We developed and validated an objective structured assessment on MV using a pulmonary simulator and a mechanical ventilator addressing the main competencies in MV. The performance of residents in the SBA at the beginning of an ICU rotation was lower than the performance in MCE, highlighting the need for greater emphasis on practical skills in MV during residency. American Thoracic Society 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9341499/ /pubmed/35924199 http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0130OC Text en Copyright © 2022 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . For commercial usage and reprints, please e-mail Diane Gern.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hayashi, Fatima K.
Sousa, Mayson L. A.
Garcia, Marcos V. F.
Macedo, Bruno R.
Ferreira, Juliana C.
Simulation-based Assessment to Measure Proficiency in Mechanical Ventilation among Residents
title Simulation-based Assessment to Measure Proficiency in Mechanical Ventilation among Residents
title_full Simulation-based Assessment to Measure Proficiency in Mechanical Ventilation among Residents
title_fullStr Simulation-based Assessment to Measure Proficiency in Mechanical Ventilation among Residents
title_full_unstemmed Simulation-based Assessment to Measure Proficiency in Mechanical Ventilation among Residents
title_short Simulation-based Assessment to Measure Proficiency in Mechanical Ventilation among Residents
title_sort simulation-based assessment to measure proficiency in mechanical ventilation among residents
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9341499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35924199
http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0130OC
work_keys_str_mv AT hayashifatimak simulationbasedassessmenttomeasureproficiencyinmechanicalventilationamongresidents
AT sousamaysonla simulationbasedassessmenttomeasureproficiencyinmechanicalventilationamongresidents
AT garciamarcosvf simulationbasedassessmenttomeasureproficiencyinmechanicalventilationamongresidents
AT macedobrunor simulationbasedassessmenttomeasureproficiencyinmechanicalventilationamongresidents
AT ferreirajulianac simulationbasedassessmenttomeasureproficiencyinmechanicalventilationamongresidents