Cargando…

Physical activity promoting teaching practices and children’s physical activity within physical education lessons underpinned by motor learning theory (SAMPLE-PE)

PURPOSE: Movement competence is a key outcome for primary physical education (PE) curricula. As movement development in children emerges through physical activity (PA), it is important to determine the extent of PA promotion within movement competence focused teaching pedagogies. Therefore, this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crotti, Matteo, Rudd, James, Roberts, Simon, Fitton Davies, Katie, O’Callaghan, Laura, Utesch, Till, Foweather, Lawrence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9342796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35913904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272339
_version_ 1784760903768473600
author Crotti, Matteo
Rudd, James
Roberts, Simon
Fitton Davies, Katie
O’Callaghan, Laura
Utesch, Till
Foweather, Lawrence
author_facet Crotti, Matteo
Rudd, James
Roberts, Simon
Fitton Davies, Katie
O’Callaghan, Laura
Utesch, Till
Foweather, Lawrence
author_sort Crotti, Matteo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Movement competence is a key outcome for primary physical education (PE) curricula. As movement development in children emerges through physical activity (PA), it is important to determine the extent of PA promotion within movement competence focused teaching pedagogies. Therefore, this study aimed to assess children’s moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and related teaching practices in primary PE within Linear pedagogy and Nonlinear pedagogy and to compare this to current practice within PE delivery in primary schools. METHODS: Participants (n = 162, 53% females, 5-6y) were recruited from 9 primary schools within the SAMPLE-PE cluster randomised controlled trial. Schools were randomly-allocated to one of three conditions: Linear pedagogy, Nonlinear pedagogy, or control. Nonlinear and Linear pedagogy intervention schools received a PE curriculum delivered by trained deliverers over 15 weeks, while control schools followed usual practice. Children’s MVPA was measured during 3 PE lessons (44 PE lessons in total) using an ActiGraph GT9X accelerometer worn on their non-dominant wrist. Differences between conditions for children’s MVPA were analysed using multilevel model analysis. Negative binomial models were used to analyse teaching practices data. RESULTS: No differences were found between Linear pedagogy, Nonlinear pedagogy and the control group for children’s MVPA levels during PE. Linear and Nonlinear interventions generally included higher percentages of MVPA promoting teaching practices (e.g., Motor Content) and lower MVPA reducing teaching practices (e.g., Management), compared to the control group. Teaching practices observed in Linear and Nonlinear interventions were in line with the respective pedagogical principles. CONCLUSIONS: Linear and Nonlinear pedagogical approaches in PE do not negatively impact MVPA compared to usual practice. Nevertheless, practitioners may need to refine these pedagogical approaches to improve MVPA alongside movement competence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9342796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93427962022-08-02 Physical activity promoting teaching practices and children’s physical activity within physical education lessons underpinned by motor learning theory (SAMPLE-PE) Crotti, Matteo Rudd, James Roberts, Simon Fitton Davies, Katie O’Callaghan, Laura Utesch, Till Foweather, Lawrence PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Movement competence is a key outcome for primary physical education (PE) curricula. As movement development in children emerges through physical activity (PA), it is important to determine the extent of PA promotion within movement competence focused teaching pedagogies. Therefore, this study aimed to assess children’s moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and related teaching practices in primary PE within Linear pedagogy and Nonlinear pedagogy and to compare this to current practice within PE delivery in primary schools. METHODS: Participants (n = 162, 53% females, 5-6y) were recruited from 9 primary schools within the SAMPLE-PE cluster randomised controlled trial. Schools were randomly-allocated to one of three conditions: Linear pedagogy, Nonlinear pedagogy, or control. Nonlinear and Linear pedagogy intervention schools received a PE curriculum delivered by trained deliverers over 15 weeks, while control schools followed usual practice. Children’s MVPA was measured during 3 PE lessons (44 PE lessons in total) using an ActiGraph GT9X accelerometer worn on their non-dominant wrist. Differences between conditions for children’s MVPA were analysed using multilevel model analysis. Negative binomial models were used to analyse teaching practices data. RESULTS: No differences were found between Linear pedagogy, Nonlinear pedagogy and the control group for children’s MVPA levels during PE. Linear and Nonlinear interventions generally included higher percentages of MVPA promoting teaching practices (e.g., Motor Content) and lower MVPA reducing teaching practices (e.g., Management), compared to the control group. Teaching practices observed in Linear and Nonlinear interventions were in line with the respective pedagogical principles. CONCLUSIONS: Linear and Nonlinear pedagogical approaches in PE do not negatively impact MVPA compared to usual practice. Nevertheless, practitioners may need to refine these pedagogical approaches to improve MVPA alongside movement competence. Public Library of Science 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9342796/ /pubmed/35913904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272339 Text en © 2022 Crotti et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Crotti, Matteo
Rudd, James
Roberts, Simon
Fitton Davies, Katie
O’Callaghan, Laura
Utesch, Till
Foweather, Lawrence
Physical activity promoting teaching practices and children’s physical activity within physical education lessons underpinned by motor learning theory (SAMPLE-PE)
title Physical activity promoting teaching practices and children’s physical activity within physical education lessons underpinned by motor learning theory (SAMPLE-PE)
title_full Physical activity promoting teaching practices and children’s physical activity within physical education lessons underpinned by motor learning theory (SAMPLE-PE)
title_fullStr Physical activity promoting teaching practices and children’s physical activity within physical education lessons underpinned by motor learning theory (SAMPLE-PE)
title_full_unstemmed Physical activity promoting teaching practices and children’s physical activity within physical education lessons underpinned by motor learning theory (SAMPLE-PE)
title_short Physical activity promoting teaching practices and children’s physical activity within physical education lessons underpinned by motor learning theory (SAMPLE-PE)
title_sort physical activity promoting teaching practices and children’s physical activity within physical education lessons underpinned by motor learning theory (sample-pe)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9342796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35913904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272339
work_keys_str_mv AT crottimatteo physicalactivitypromotingteachingpracticesandchildrensphysicalactivitywithinphysicaleducationlessonsunderpinnedbymotorlearningtheorysamplepe
AT ruddjames physicalactivitypromotingteachingpracticesandchildrensphysicalactivitywithinphysicaleducationlessonsunderpinnedbymotorlearningtheorysamplepe
AT robertssimon physicalactivitypromotingteachingpracticesandchildrensphysicalactivitywithinphysicaleducationlessonsunderpinnedbymotorlearningtheorysamplepe
AT fittondavieskatie physicalactivitypromotingteachingpracticesandchildrensphysicalactivitywithinphysicaleducationlessonsunderpinnedbymotorlearningtheorysamplepe
AT ocallaghanlaura physicalactivitypromotingteachingpracticesandchildrensphysicalactivitywithinphysicaleducationlessonsunderpinnedbymotorlearningtheorysamplepe
AT uteschtill physicalactivitypromotingteachingpracticesandchildrensphysicalactivitywithinphysicaleducationlessonsunderpinnedbymotorlearningtheorysamplepe
AT foweatherlawrence physicalactivitypromotingteachingpracticesandchildrensphysicalactivitywithinphysicaleducationlessonsunderpinnedbymotorlearningtheorysamplepe