Cargando…

Premortem anticoagulation timing and dose in donation after circulatory death: multicentre study of associations with graft function

BACKGROUND: In controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD), it is common to administer premortem heparin to potential donors. This practice remains controversial because there is limited evidence for it and there is the possibility of inducing hemorrhage. To our knowledge, no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kramer, Andreas H., Holliday, Kerry, Keenan, Sean, Isac, George, Kutsogiannis, Demetrius J., Kneteman, Norman M., Kim, Peter, Robertson, Adrian, Nickerson, Peter W., Tibbles, Lee Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Impact Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.023120
_version_ 1784760939570003968
author Kramer, Andreas H.
Holliday, Kerry
Keenan, Sean
Isac, George
Kutsogiannis, Demetrius J.
Kneteman, Norman M.
Kim, Peter
Robertson, Adrian
Nickerson, Peter W.
Tibbles, Lee Anne
author_facet Kramer, Andreas H.
Holliday, Kerry
Keenan, Sean
Isac, George
Kutsogiannis, Demetrius J.
Kneteman, Norman M.
Kim, Peter
Robertson, Adrian
Nickerson, Peter W.
Tibbles, Lee Anne
author_sort Kramer, Andreas H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD), it is common to administer premortem heparin to potential donors. This practice remains controversial because there is limited evidence for it and there is the possibility of inducing hemorrhage. To our knowledge, no previous studies have assessed the effects of heparin timing and dose on graft function. METHODS: We performed a multicentre cohort study of consecutive DCD donors and the recipients of their organs. Anticoagulation administration was considered early if given near the time of withdrawal of life-sustaining measures and late if delayed until the onset of donor hypoxemia (oxygen saturation < 70%) or hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 60 mm Hg or mean blood pressure < 50 mm Hg). The anticoagulation dose was considered high if it was 300 units/kg or greater. RESULTS: Donor anticoagulation data were available for 301 kidney, 75 liver and 46 lung recipients. Heparin was administered in 92% of cases and was most commonly withheld in donors with cerebrovascular causes of death (p = 0.01). Administration was late in 59% and the dose was low in 27%. Among kidney recipients, there were no significant differences in need for dialysis, glomerular filtration rate over the first year after transplantation or graft survival on the basis of whether or not the donor received heparin, the timing of heparin administration or the dose of heparin. Among liver recipients, alkaline phosphatase concentrations over the first year were significantly higher among recipients who received organs from donors to whom lower doses of heparin had been administered. CONCLUSION: Premortem heparin is widely used in DCD cases, but there is variability in timing and dose, which was not associated with kidney outcomes in this study. Donor anticoagulation may have a greater impact in preventing biliary complications following liver transplantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9343016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher CMA Impact Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93430162022-08-05 Premortem anticoagulation timing and dose in donation after circulatory death: multicentre study of associations with graft function Kramer, Andreas H. Holliday, Kerry Keenan, Sean Isac, George Kutsogiannis, Demetrius J. Kneteman, Norman M. Kim, Peter Robertson, Adrian Nickerson, Peter W. Tibbles, Lee Anne Can J Surg Research BACKGROUND: In controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD), it is common to administer premortem heparin to potential donors. This practice remains controversial because there is limited evidence for it and there is the possibility of inducing hemorrhage. To our knowledge, no previous studies have assessed the effects of heparin timing and dose on graft function. METHODS: We performed a multicentre cohort study of consecutive DCD donors and the recipients of their organs. Anticoagulation administration was considered early if given near the time of withdrawal of life-sustaining measures and late if delayed until the onset of donor hypoxemia (oxygen saturation < 70%) or hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 60 mm Hg or mean blood pressure < 50 mm Hg). The anticoagulation dose was considered high if it was 300 units/kg or greater. RESULTS: Donor anticoagulation data were available for 301 kidney, 75 liver and 46 lung recipients. Heparin was administered in 92% of cases and was most commonly withheld in donors with cerebrovascular causes of death (p = 0.01). Administration was late in 59% and the dose was low in 27%. Among kidney recipients, there were no significant differences in need for dialysis, glomerular filtration rate over the first year after transplantation or graft survival on the basis of whether or not the donor received heparin, the timing of heparin administration or the dose of heparin. Among liver recipients, alkaline phosphatase concentrations over the first year were significantly higher among recipients who received organs from donors to whom lower doses of heparin had been administered. CONCLUSION: Premortem heparin is widely used in DCD cases, but there is variability in timing and dose, which was not associated with kidney outcomes in this study. Donor anticoagulation may have a greater impact in preventing biliary complications following liver transplantation. CMA Impact Inc. 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9343016/ /pubmed/35902105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.023120 Text en © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Kramer, Andreas H.
Holliday, Kerry
Keenan, Sean
Isac, George
Kutsogiannis, Demetrius J.
Kneteman, Norman M.
Kim, Peter
Robertson, Adrian
Nickerson, Peter W.
Tibbles, Lee Anne
Premortem anticoagulation timing and dose in donation after circulatory death: multicentre study of associations with graft function
title Premortem anticoagulation timing and dose in donation after circulatory death: multicentre study of associations with graft function
title_full Premortem anticoagulation timing and dose in donation after circulatory death: multicentre study of associations with graft function
title_fullStr Premortem anticoagulation timing and dose in donation after circulatory death: multicentre study of associations with graft function
title_full_unstemmed Premortem anticoagulation timing and dose in donation after circulatory death: multicentre study of associations with graft function
title_short Premortem anticoagulation timing and dose in donation after circulatory death: multicentre study of associations with graft function
title_sort premortem anticoagulation timing and dose in donation after circulatory death: multicentre study of associations with graft function
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9343016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.023120
work_keys_str_mv AT kramerandreash premortemanticoagulationtiminganddoseindonationaftercirculatorydeathmulticentrestudyofassociationswithgraftfunction
AT hollidaykerry premortemanticoagulationtiminganddoseindonationaftercirculatorydeathmulticentrestudyofassociationswithgraftfunction
AT keenansean premortemanticoagulationtiminganddoseindonationaftercirculatorydeathmulticentrestudyofassociationswithgraftfunction
AT isacgeorge premortemanticoagulationtiminganddoseindonationaftercirculatorydeathmulticentrestudyofassociationswithgraftfunction
AT kutsogiannisdemetriusj premortemanticoagulationtiminganddoseindonationaftercirculatorydeathmulticentrestudyofassociationswithgraftfunction
AT knetemannormanm premortemanticoagulationtiminganddoseindonationaftercirculatorydeathmulticentrestudyofassociationswithgraftfunction
AT kimpeter premortemanticoagulationtiminganddoseindonationaftercirculatorydeathmulticentrestudyofassociationswithgraftfunction
AT robertsonadrian premortemanticoagulationtiminganddoseindonationaftercirculatorydeathmulticentrestudyofassociationswithgraftfunction
AT nickersonpeterw premortemanticoagulationtiminganddoseindonationaftercirculatorydeathmulticentrestudyofassociationswithgraftfunction
AT tibblesleeanne premortemanticoagulationtiminganddoseindonationaftercirculatorydeathmulticentrestudyofassociationswithgraftfunction